Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 hours ago, Supreme Pizza said:

All I can say about octane is that you must use at least the minimum octane rating recommended by the manufacturer.

 

So why does it always say "minimum octane rating". Well, because more is OK, less is death.

 

Higher octane doesn't make a car faster, but higher octane is required by faster cars.

 

More octane = less volatile fuel.

 

You can raise your octane rating by diluting your fuel with a less volatile fuel, like kerosene.

 

High octane fuel should be cheaper than low octane fuel. But its not. Because people that need high octane fuel have more money. And because people think paying more for fuel will get you better fuel.

 

If the fuel is "too combustible", then it will ignite before the spark happens. That is called pre-ignition, spark knock, or detonation.  High compression engines have issues with pre-ignition, so they use higher octane fuel, so that the gas wont "blow up" before its supposed to during the compression cycle. Its counter-intuitive, but lower grade (deluted) fuel works better for higher compression engines. I see people put "octane booster" or "premium gas" in their crappy cars, hoping it will make them faster or more reliable. Doesn't work that way. You want to use the minimum octane fuel that is acceptable for your engine. Low octane fuel is more powerful than high octane fuel.

 

 

BLOG06_180419780_AR_0_UQSWVLQCCQFO.jpg

 

Posted (edited)
On 12/21/2021 at 2:07 AM, Supreme Pizza said:

All I can say about octane is that you must use at least the minimum octane rating recommended by the manufacturer.

 

So why does it always say "minimum octane rating". Well, because more is OK, less is death.

 

Higher octane doesn't make a car faster, but higher octane is required by faster cars.

 

More octane = less volatile fuel.

 

You can raise your octane rating by diluting your fuel with a less volatile fuel, like kerosene.

 

High octane fuel should be cheaper than low octane fuel. But its not. Because people that need high octane fuel have more money. And because people think paying more for fuel will get you better fuel.

 

If the fuel is "too combustible", then it will ignite before the spark happens. That is called pre-ignition, spark knock, or detonation.  High compression engines have issues with pre-ignition, so they use higher octane fuel, so that the gas wont "blow up" before its supposed to during the compression cycle. Its counter-intuitive, but lower grade (deluted) fuel works better for higher compression engines. I see people put "octane booster" or "premium gas" in their crappy cars, hoping it will make them faster or more reliable. Doesn't work that way. You want to use the minimum octane fuel that is acceptable for your engine. Low octane fuel is more powerful than high octane fuel.

 

 

BLOG06_180419780_AR_0_UQSWVLQCCQFO.jpg


All of that bolded info is incorrect.

Edited by RCF71
Accuracy
  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, RCF71 said:


All of that bolded info is incorrect.

 

 

 "I see people put "octane booster" or "premium gas" in their crappy cars, hoping it will make them faster or more reliable."

 

How is this statement incorrect in any way? And how would you be able to determine if I have seen people pour octane booster into their Geo Metro, while they were bragging about how much faster it makes their car?

 

Anyway,

 

I would suggest that people do their own research and choose the option that they feel is best. Especially when its something as important as using the correct octane, diet, medical treatments, vehicle to purchase, the best brand of refrigerator, etc.

 

Read the forums, talk to the experts, research all the available information, and draw your own conclusions. Facts and opinions can be a grey area. Interpretation can be a factor as well.

 

Even if one direction is the "correct direction" for most, its not going to be ideal for all.

 

Don't follow anyone's advice, but rather use that advise in combination with your other sources of information in order to make the decision that you feel will suit your needs the best.

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Supreme Pizza said:

 

 

 "I see people put "octane booster" or "premium gas" in their crappy cars, hoping it will make them faster or more reliable."

 

How is this statement incorrect in any way? And how would you be able to determine if I have seen people pour octane booster into their Geo Metro, while they were bragging about how much faster it makes their car?

Ok, fixed it.


A few notes:

 

- octane and volatility are not correlated, octane has more to do with the chemical structure of each molecule, not its size (which is what most affects volatility)

- higher octane fuel is definitely not cheaper to produce, refineries have processing units that cost 100’s of millions of dollars to convert low octane molecules into higher octane molecules… why should higher octane fuel be cheaper?

- lower octane is not “more combustible”, it simply has a lower activation energy - combustion is a chemical reaction, and all reactions need a certain amount of energy to start/continue

- “diluted” fuel is not better for high compression engines, unless you are “diluting” the gasoline portion with an additive that has much higher octane (ethanol, methanol, mtbe, etc)

- lower octane fuel may or may not have more energy than higher octane fuel, again, not directly correlated.  In the case of ethanol addition to raise octane, it is true that the energy content is lowered (ethanol has approx. 30% lower energy content than typical gasoline)

- do not put kerosene in your gasoline, it will not burn completely and will leave you with carbon deposits (at best, because it will not vaporize and mix thoroughly), but kerosene can go into diesel to lower power pour point/prevent gelling

 

 

Edited by RCF71
  • Like 1
Posted

To reinforce what RCF71 just said:

Lower octane fuel burns faster, but doesnt produce more BTU's (energy) than higher octane fuel. The speed of the burn from the octane is what can cause the issue when used in a engine that has a high compression ration.

The sound of detonation or knock is caused when pre-ignition happens. As the fuel-air mix is pushed into the combustion chamber and is compressed the leading edges of the valve or the valve reliefs on the pistons can be hot enough they ignite the fuel-air mix before the top of the compression cycle and before the spark plug actually fires to ignite the fuel-air mix. This causes an issue due to when the hot spot in the chamber ignites the fuel-air mix it starts a flame front (propagation) to race across the combustion chamber. As the flame front is racing across the chamber the spark plug then ignites the mix as well, now you have 2 different flame fronts traveling across the chamber towards each other at the speed of sound. When they collide the cause the audible "knock" or pinging that we hear. This also can cause damage of the knock is severe enough, when inspected the tops of the pistons will have marks on them similar to if you hit the piston top with a ball peen hammer.

The way you control this is with a higher octane fuel that burns slower and resists pre-ignition, this allows the spark plug to do its job and to ignite the fuel-air mix with a single spark source.

Posted (edited)
57 minutes ago, TJay74 said:

To reinforce what RCF71 just said:

Lower octane fuel burns faster, but doesnt produce more BTU's (energy) than higher octane fuel. The speed of the burn from the octane is what can cause the issue when used in a engine that has a high compression ration.

The sound of detonation or knock is caused when pre-ignition happens. As the fuel-air mix is pushed into the combustion chamber and is compressed the leading edges of the valve or the valve reliefs on the pistons can be hot enough they ignite the fuel-air mix before the top of the compression cycle and before the spark plug actually fires to ignite the fuel-air mix. This causes an issue due to when the hot spot in the chamber ignites the fuel-air mix it starts a flame front (propagation) to race across the combustion chamber. As the flame front is racing across the chamber the spark plug then ignites the mix as well, now you have 2 different flame fronts traveling across the chamber towards each other at the speed of sound. When they collide the cause the audible "knock" or pinging that we hear. This also can cause damage of the knock is severe enough, when inspected the tops of the pistons will have marks on them similar to if you hit the piston top with a ball peen hammer.

The way you control this is with a higher octane fuel that burns slower and resists pre-ignition, this allows the spark plug to do its job and to ignite the fuel-air mix with a single spark source.

 

You shouldn't state that low octane fuel burns faster. It's entirely dependent on the composition of the fuel. Some of the highest octane fuels are also some of the fastest burning. Resistance to pre-ignition is the purpose of high octane. Burn speed really only becomes a factor when you have a high reving, high strung engine and you require a faster burn speed at high rpm's. Tuning is also a big factor here. Adjustments in timing can be made to accommodate the fuel's burn speed; making as much, or even more power then the slower burning fuel. Or vice versa for that matter..

Edited by M1ck3y
Posted
1 hour ago, M1ck3y said:

 

You shouldn't state that low octane fuel burns faster. It's entirely dependent on the composition of the fuel. Some of the highest octane fuels are also some of the fastest burning. Resistance to pre-ignition is the purpose of high octane. Burn speed really only becomes a factor when you have a high reving, high strung engine and you require a faster burn speed at high rpm's. Tuning is also a big factor here. Adjustments in timing can be made to accommodate the fuel's burn speed; making as much, or even more power then the slower burning fuel. Or vice versa for that matter..

 

 

This was a very basic run down, once you get into oxygenated fuels you get into a whole new type of conversation.

Posted
27 minutes ago, swathdiver said:

I wonder how many folks know that ethanol is used to reduce spark knock these days?

 

Ethanol is a cheap and amazing way to get rid of knock. My 2016 6.2/A8 has been on E85 for 4 years now, it runs great. Even still if a person only has 91 they can add up to E10 with no harm. If the trucks tank is 26 gallons that means you can easily add 2.5-3 gallons of E85 to the 91, it will help with detonation and make the truck run better as well.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I had a '16 with 6.2L and 8 speed.  Damn 8 speed was so clunky I often ran 87 octane.  Why the hell not.  Shitty transmission didn't deserve any better.  It's only $3k for the 6.2L.  Sold it after 5 years to CarMax for nearly what I paid for it excluding sales tax.

 

Don't see the reason to pamper a full-size truck when they consistently are at bottom of any reliability rating anyway.

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 389 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
    • Good evening. I was lucky enough to get passed down to me a 2007 GMC LBZ that was my great uncle's. While the underside and rockers are more or less gone I feel like with time I can restore it to working order since it only has 110,000 miles and he put nearly every option he could get without getting the new body style since he did not trust DEF. So far I have done everything I can think of but when I put the key into the ignition nothing happens. I put 2 brand new batteries in it. Cleaned the terminals. Check all the fuses and relays and they all pass with my multimeter. I know I'm missing something that I just cant think of. The only odd thing is the OBD2 port works which makes me think its not the mega fuse. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...