Jump to content

2021 Silverado 1500 alternator/water pump belt issue

lapoolboy
 Share

Recommended Posts

lapoolboy Senior Enthusiast

lapoolboy

Posted
Posted

Back in January I took my truck into the dealer to have a minor start-up squeal/chirp investigated.  I knew it was the belt because I could see lots of black rubber belt "dust" all over the front of the engine behind the belt.  I could also mist a little bit of water on the belt while the engine was running and the sound would go away temporarily.  The technician determined it was a bad idler pulley so he replaced it but the belt was on backorder so he just reinstalled the same belt.  The squeal/chirp immediately returned.  I know these belts are one-time use only since they are stretch fit so I insisted on a new one.  They ordered a new belt and it has finally come in.  I'm just waiting on them to let me know when I can bring the truck by to have the tech slap it on real quick.

 

My concern is that there is a lot of the same black rubber belt dust on the engine again.  Could this all be caused by the "used" belt slipping on the pulleys?  Or is there an issue with alignment and/or another bad pulley?

imagejpeg_0 (9) (1).jpg

voided3 Enthusiast

voided3

Posted
Posted

Ours was almost as bad as yours, and the belt started to go bad around 6300 miles. There was belt dust on the front of the motor similar to what you have pictured. They replaced the serpentine belt, idler pulley, and A/C belt. The truck is about to roll over 12,000 miles and while I see some of the same wear occurring again, I don't have a squeak like I did before yet; ours only squeaked/chirped rhythmically when it was cold for the first few minutes.

 

My guess is there may be some kind of alignment issue going on or something has a bad bearing, but it's hard to say. They didn't say anything about anything else being amiss when they replaced our belts, but I'm sure they had their finest apprentice on the job and they were not thorough enough to check the alternator or water pump, or the state of the crank pulley. I really hate that they didn't put traditional belt tensioners on these engines and part of me feel like it's a design flaw. It also makes it way more difficult to change a belt in an emergency situation.

 

Our other vehicle, a 2019 Mini Countryman with only about 12,600 miles, has essentially no belt wear and it looks brand new, while our truck already has been through one set of belts and an idler pulley in less mileage. The hilarious part is the truck's manual says it's a 150,000 mile service interval on the belts. HA. 

lapoolboy Senior Enthusiast

lapoolboy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I agree with your sentiments.  The A/C belt looks flawless and new.  You can see it in the background of my picture - the markings/words on the back are still very clear and legible.  To me, this indicates no amount of slippage or wear.  The alternator/water pump belt on the other hand...

 

The back of that belt is completely devoid of any markings/words and you can see the wear on it.

voided3 Enthusiast

voided3

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, lapoolboy said:

I agree with your sentiments.  The A/C belt looks flawless and new.  You can see it in the background of my picture - the markings/words on the back are still very clear and legible.  To me, this indicates no amount of slippage or wear.  The alternator/water pump belt on the other hand...

 

The back of that belt is completely devoid of any markings/words and you can see the wear on it.

Right, which makes me think it must be the water pump pulley because the alternator, idler, and crank pulleys contact the ribbed side of the belt, so it's the only one touching the back of the belt. Maybe the cooling fans blast rain and road debris directly at it and cause it to slip when the weather is nasty? These trucks have active aero shutters, though, so you'd think that wouldn't be an issue.

 

On a side note, if anyone knows of a better-than-OEM serpentine belt upgrade for the L84 5.3 engines, I'm all ears and am certainly down to try it.

Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted

I've been saying it for quite some time now -- At least 1 of the pulleys is misaligned from the factory.  5.3s and 6.2s are having the same problem, but I hear more about squeaking from the 6.2 owners on this forum than the 5.3s.  With that said, my dealer has only applied some dry lubricant per GM instructions.  It did quiet down the squeaking a little.  I'm still on the same belt my truck came with, and I'm at about 23,500 miles.  It seems that if you let it wear down a bit it'll quiet right up, and there's been no other issues with the belt.  A proper shim job, or proper aligning of the pulleys, would avoid this problem, but GM doesn't care.  There is a business term "satisficing".  It clearly applies here. 

Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, lapoolboy said:

I don't think a pulley misalignment issue would be eating up the BACK of the belt though, right?

I think it's possible given the back of the belt is the contact surface for 1 pulley.  I'm no expert.  It's just a thought.  If the pulley isn't running parallel to the belt I could see some wear given the belt contacts over 180° of the pulley at all times.

Edited by Transient
voided3 Enthusiast

voided3

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, Transient said:

There is a business term "satisficing".  It clearly applies here. 

I'm surprised that's not a trim package at this point: The Satificer

 

I'm also surprised that your dealer put anything on the belt as you're not supposed to put anything on a EDPM rubber belt like the "belt dressings" they would sometimes use on older style V-belts.

 

Perhaps in four or five years they'll admit there's a design issue and do a recall.

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, lapoolboy said:

Back in January I took my truck into the dealer to have a minor start-up squeal/chirp investigated.  I knew it was the belt because I could see lots of black rubber belt "dust" all over the front of the engine behind the belt.  I could also mist a little bit of water on the belt while the engine was running and the sound would go away temporarily.  The technician determined it was a bad idler pulley so he replaced it but the belt was on backorder so he just reinstalled the same belt.  The squeal/chirp immediately returned.  I know these belts are one-time use only since they are stretch fit so I insisted on a new one.  They ordered a new belt and it has finally come in.  I'm just waiting on them to let me know when I can bring the truck by to have the tech slap it on real quick.

 

My concern is that there is a lot of the same black rubber belt dust on the engine again.  Could this all be caused by the "used" belt slipping on the pulleys?  Or is there an issue with alignment and/or another bad pulley?

 

 

 

When they take that off to put the new one on, have them spin the water pump by hand and see how it feels.  We've put a few on already, the one last night seized and fried the belt during its degredation.  

Silverado4x4 Senior Enthusiast

Silverado4x4

Posted
Posted (edited)

voided3 is right, belt dressing is a temp. fix for a bad belt and not good for those type of belts. I don't see it being an alignment issue as those belts will tear up the edges of the belt in an alignment issue and walk off the pully quick if not aligned right. I do see the ribs of the belt are cracked which means the belt is dry and probably old or some type of chemical got on it. There are plenty of better belts out there like Gates for one and many others. I would chalk it up to a bad old belt even though it was new.

Or as newdude said above.

Edited by Silverado4x4
diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

How much $ per unit did GM save by removing the belt tensioner?   X 1 mil. units.

 

voided3 Enthusiast

voided3

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, diyer2 said:

How much $ per unit did GM save by removing the belt tensioner?   X 1 mil. units.

 

Probably a lot, which I'm sure was the driving motivator. I can't help but notice that the gas L8T 6.6 V8 in the HD trucks have a belt tensioner, though. That always implies to me that it's a more robust setup if that's what they use in their HD fleet trucks, though those trucks also have hydraulic power steering pumps and sometimes dual alternators so the needs are different.

Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, diyer2 said:

How much $ per unit did GM save by removing the belt tensioner?   X 1 mil. units.

 

GM is currently selling about 575,000 Silverados per year.  Retail price aftermarket for a tensioner on a 2018 is about $40.  To keep the math simple, assume 50% markup.  $20×575,000=$1,150,000 per year savings, assumed.  2022 is the 4th model year of the current design, so approximately $4.6 million in savings to date. 

diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

What about GM trucks? That's why I said 1 mil. Just a number to make a point. Didn't look it up.

Transient Senior Enthusiast

Transient

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, voided3 said:

I'm surprised that's not a trim package at this point: The Satificer

 

I'm also surprised that your dealer put anything on the belt as you're not supposed to put anything on a EDPM rubber belt like the "belt dressings" they would sometimes use on older style V-belts.

 

Perhaps in four or five years they'll admit there's a design issue and do a recall.

SE = Satisficing Enough  🤣🤣🤣

 

They said the instructions came from GM.  Whether or not they screw it up, because they did it they/GM will cover it.  Until the truck is out of warranty, only Chevy dealers are touching it.  Makes it harder for them to deny warranty coverage.  Once the warranty is up the truck will be service by mechanics instead of technicians. 

 

It took GM way longer than 4-5 years to acknowledge an ignition switch problem.  You're being too optimistic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Another JR
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By Another JR · Posted

      Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • newdude
      Gas fill door

      By newdude · Posted

      Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • newdude
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By newdude · Posted

      No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...