Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, customboss said:

 

What does LAC stand for? 

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, customboss said:

 

How is the chart on page four to be interpreted? 

Posted
9 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

How is the chart on page four to be interpreted? 

Confusing eh?  Yes the depiction is not clear without her speaking which I don't have. 

 

The GM engineer Rebecca Monroe is attempting to show unwashed gum tests for gasoline fuels levels over the years, overlaid with levels of treat to try to counter the gum levels. 

 

Since using dispersants (wrongly called detergents) can remove these potential deposit formers.  Even a tiny amount of fuel gum will cause sticking rings, valves, etc. 

 

LAC vs Top Tier vs non top tier treated fuels. 

 

"According to the fuel specifications ASTM D1655 (“Standard Specification for Aviation Turbine Fuels”) and ASTM D4814 (“Standard Specification for Automotive Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel”), the limitations for the gum content are 7 milligrams per 100 mL for aviation turbine fuel and 5 milligrams per 100 mL for motor ...

 

How to measure the gum content of fuels - Anton Paar Wiki"

 

 

  • Like 1
  • 2 years later...
Posted

Here in the province of Ontario in Canada I have heard of Top Tier gasoline but I've never heard of a brand touting that their gas is Top Tier. I know in the past contacting the companies asking whether or not their premium contained ethanol (for 2 stroke snowmobile us) usually resulted in a form email thanking me for contacting them... I imagine I'd get the same result emailing them asking if their gas was Top Tier.

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, revrnd said:

Here in the province of Ontario in Canada I have heard of Top Tier gasoline but I've never heard of a brand touting that their gas is Top Tier. I know in the past contacting the companies asking whether or not their premium contained ethanol (for 2 stroke snowmobile us) usually resulted in a form email thanking me for contacting them... I imagine I'd get the same result emailing them asking if their gas was Top Tier.

 

Shell Canada's website says their gas is Top Tier. 

 

Their premium has been zero ethanol, but I haven't verified that recently. 

 

I steer away from independent fuel discounters and stick with major brands,  but don't worry about  Top Tier. 

 

 

Edited by redwngr
  • Thanks 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, redwngr said:

 

Shell Canada's website says their gas is Top Tier. 

 

Their premium has been zero ethanol, but I haven't verified that recently. 

 

I steer away from fuel independent fuel discounters and stick with major brands,  but don't worry about  Top Tier. 

 

 

Our recent regs stated that all grades of gas are supposed to contain ethanol. But I have tested the local premium for my powersports use & it still is ethanol free.

 

I think Canadian Tire's gas bars had been supplied by Imperial Oil (Esso, owned by Exxon) but have now rebranded some of their locations as Petrocan after tying their rewards card to the Petro Points system. Not sure if that means Petrocan (Suncor) is their supplier now.

 

I hear you on the independents. I learned my lesson years ago w/ my '82 K15 that had the LE9 ESC motor. Filled up at the gas bar east of where I lived and then headed north on a Fri'. Truck was pinging going down a hill...

 

There have been a couple of instances in Toronto where folks have had issues after filling up @ certain gas stations...

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I’ve been running an experiment without knowing it. My Avalanche gets only a store brand gas and has been for almost 5 years. We have a discount card. Being a gas guzzler I go with the discount gas. The wife’s Genesis gets mostly Exxon or shell. I drive it on Sunday to church and fill it for her. The trip vehicle, the Odyssey gets mostly truck stop gas usually Loves sometimes the store brand at home. No reason other than convenience. I did injection cleaning once on the Genesis at 120K. They gave me a discount. No difference was noticeable. In other news. Just did a rotation on the Odyssey at 30K on the tires. Look almost new. When I got the vehicle the tires were noisy and wearing awful. Was thinking alignment . Would be the first time ever. Discount even suggested it. They don’t do alignments. I didn’t was going on a trip it slipped my mind. My experience which is all can offer is. Most of the time we’re being sold a bill of goods. I always buy the best tires and get gas at high volume places. Nothing scientific about this, just my experience. I just don’t like people messing with my tires or front end more than necessary. For me anyway less is more. I would mention what I do about oil. But there’s enough about that already. 

  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 4/16/2022 at 3:11 PM, customboss said:

First mass marketed and produced Gas Direct Injection marketed to US was Hyundai, 2009 .

 

The engineers there were former Ford folks, interesting Ford introduced the 2010 series Ecoboost right after Hyundai. 

 

The rest of the WIKI  distraction has no bearing on the deposits most are experiencing whether they know it or not. 

 

True DDI , diesel direct injection was introduced much earlier. 

 

 

 

 

No love for GM with the 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt SS with the LNF engine?  The LNF engine was a 2.0 liter turbocharged direct injection engine.  The LNF replaced the LSJ because the LSJ, a supercharged 2.0 liter engine couldn't pass new emissions requirements at the time.  Iirc, LNF was also in the Saturn Sky Redline and Pontiac Solstice GXP.

Posted (edited)
On 12/29/2024 at 6:11 AM, KARNUT said:

I’ve been running an experiment without knowing it. My Avalanche gets only a store brand gas and has been for almost 5 years. We have a discount card. Being a gas guzzler I go with the discount gas. The wife’s Genesis gets mostly Exxon or shell. I drive it on Sunday to church and fill it for her. The trip vehicle, the Odyssey gets mostly truck stop gas usually Loves sometimes the store brand at home. No reason other than convenience. I did injection cleaning once on the Genesis at 120K. They gave me a discount. No difference was noticeable. In other news. Just did a rotation on the Odyssey at 30K on the tires. Look almost new. When I got the vehicle the tires were noisy and wearing awful. Was thinking alignment . Would be the first time ever. Discount even suggested it. They don’t do alignments. I didn’t was going on a trip it slipped my mind. My experience which is all can offer is. Most of the time we’re being sold a bill of goods. I always buy the best tires and get gas at high volume places. Nothing scientific about this, just my experience. I just don’t like people messing with my tires or front end more than necessary. For me anyway less is more. I would mention what I do about oil. But there’s enough about that already. 

Discount Tire does do alignments.  They've been adding it to their stores over the last year+.

 

As for me and the wife, it's Top Tier only.  She has 120,000 miles on her Traverse.  On the fuel side things are fantastic.  I wish I could say the same for things like the transmission.  I'm only at 78,000 on the Silverado, so not much room to talk there.  The wife prefers to fill up at Shell.  I fill up at Chevron. 

 

Since the subject of gumming up was brought up previously, I have a question.  Would Marvel Mystery Oil help percent the valves/valve springs from getting stuck?

Edited by Transient
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

To be a Top Tier Fuel it must pass a set of cleanliness tests. To pass those test most of these Top Tier fuels contain 2X to 3X the LAC (Lowest Additive Content). 

 

Shell V Power Nitro + Premium contains not only 6X the LAC but a friction modifier as well. 

Exxon/Mobil Synergy Supreme + Premium also contains a friction modifier that claims a 30% reduction in ring/bore wear. No claim as to the detergent multiplication I can find in print. 

 

These friction and multiples of Top Tier detergent add packs are only available in there Premium fuels.  The 87 and 89 octane fuel follow the regular pattern of 2 to 3X the detergents of  LAC but do not contain the friction package

 

I guess the question one needs to ask themselves is if a 30% reduction in wear is worth the near a dollar a gallon expense. For me, the answer is yes. YMMV. Locally my choice has been Shell. Exxon/Mobil, in my area, is about 50 cents a gallon more. That said, on the road and absent a Shell Station I will use XOM fuel. Absent both any Top Tier Premium. Chevron my first alternate. (PEA based detergent). Then Marathon. 

 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Transient said:

Discount Tire does do alignments.  They've been adding it to their stores over the last year+.

 

As for me and the wife, it's Top Tier only.  She has 120,000 miles on her Traverse.  On the fuel side things are fantastic.  I wish I could say the same for things like the transmission.  I'm only at 78,000 on the Silverado, so not much room to talk there.  The wife prefers to fill up at Shell.  I fill up at Chevron. 

 

Since the subject of gumming up was brought up previously, I have a question.  Would Marvel Mystery Oil help percent the valves/valve springs from getting stuck?

No Sir, not in a modern engine, its napthenic constituent burns off very quick. In a old school  air cooled aircraft engine it helps in fuel and oil.  The only thing that helps in DI engines for instance is keeping that injector flowing properly so its not scrubbing oil off the cylinder with excess fuel. 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

To be a Top Tier Fuel it must pass a set of cleanliness tests. To pass those test most of these Top Tier fuels contain 2X to 3X the LAC (Lowest Additive Content). 

 

Shell V Power Nitro + Premium contains not only 6X the LAC but a friction modifier as well. 

Exxon/Mobil Synergy Supreme + Premium also contains a friction modifier that claims a 30% reduction in ring/bore wear. No claim as to the detergent multiplication I can find in print. 

 

These friction and multiples of Top Tier detergent add packs are only available in there Premium fuels.  The 87 and 89 octane fuel follow the regular pattern of 2 to 3X the detergents of  LAC but do not contain the friction package

 

I guess the question one needs to ask themselves is if a 30% reduction in wear is worth the near a dollar a gallon expense. For me, the answer is yes. YMMV. Locally my choice has been Shell. Exxon/Mobil, in my area, is about 50 cents a gallon more. That said, on the road and absent a Shell Station I will use XOM fuel. Absent both any Top Tier Premium. Chevron my first alternate. (PEA based detergent). Then Marathon. 

 

 

My choice has been using AMSOIL PI every 4000-5000 miles to the relatively low cost MAVERIK E15 in the DI engines. 

 

In my Multiport or carbed engines AMSOIL UCL  ( upper cylinder additive ) does that friction modification and some cleaning of injector or carb. I decide interval based on my tracking MPG drop off. 

 

Buying a rack mixed fuel is an improvement over adding things to my tank.  

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

To be a Top Tier Fuel it must pass a set of cleanliness tests. To pass those test most of these Top Tier fuels contain 2X to 3X the LAC (Lowest Additive Content). 

 

Shell V Power Nitro + Premium contains not only 6X the LAC but a friction modifier as well. 

Exxon/Mobil Synergy Supreme + Premium also contains a friction modifier that claims a 30% reduction in ring/bore wear. No claim as to the detergent multiplication I can find in print. 

 

These friction and multiples of Top Tier detergent add packs are only available in there Premium fuels.  The 87 and 89 octane fuel follow the regular pattern of 2 to 3X the detergents of  LAC but do not contain the friction package

 

 

 

 

I always find it funny how the OEMs push for Top Tier but to actually benefit from a really good Top Tier fuel it requires an octane jump to really benefit from them.  

 

I recall from a few years back there was an attempt to actually push for 91 octane to become the minimum octane rating as there would be performance and fuel economy benefits to these newer DI engines and turbo engines instead of setting them up for 87.  Automakers and Legislators Consider Making Premium Gas the New Standard

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

I always find it funny how the OEMs push for Top Tier but to actually benefit from a really good Top Tier fuel it requires an octane jump to really benefit from them.  

 

I recall from a few years back there was an attempt to actually push for 91 octane to become the minimum octane rating as there would be performance and fuel economy benefits to these newer DI engines and turbo engines instead of setting them up for 87.  Automakers and Legislators Consider Making Premium Gas the New Standard

 

 

If that min octane (avg of RON and MON ) was required ALL our engines would benefit and emission would decline. 
 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • An ultra wealthy man had the most beautiful daughter. But, there was a problem. Everything she touched would melt in her hands. No matter what, Metal, Wood, Stone. Anything she touched would melt. She could not feed herself. Because of this, men were afraid of her. Nobody would dare marry her. Her father was despaired. What could he do to help his daughter? He consulted doctors, scientists and anybody who could solve this problem. Finally one of them said, "If your daughter touches one thing that does not melt in her hands, she will be cured." He was overjoyed and came up with a plan. The next day, he held a competition. Any man who could bring his daughter an object that would not melt in her hands would be given billions of dollars to marry her. Three extremely intelligent and handsome young men took up the challenge. The first brought a very heavy steel rod, But alas, when the she touched it, it completely melted in a matter of seconds. He sadly went away. The second brought a beautiful diamond, knowing diamonds were one of the hardest substance in the world and would not melt. But alas, once she held it in her hand, it melted. He too was sent away disappointed. So now, there was one left He was very nervous & sweating. He approached the daughter & said, “put your hand in my pants pocket and feel what is in there." She did exactly what he asked. She felt something very hard. She held it in her hand, squeezing it as hard as she could. It did not melt & remained extremely hard. Her father was overjoyed. Everybody was overjoyed. She was finally cured. Nothing never, ever melted in her hand again. They married and they both lived happily ever after, raising a wonderful family. Question: What was in the the groom’s pants pocket??? Answer below ↓ M&Ms of course! They melt in your mouth, not in your hand. What on earth were you thinking?
    • There's a bunch of tea leaves that you've read, but in any case the delayed timing is unusual. Not sure how that relates to the rich at idle vs. 'normal' while driving.   If you're in this deep, might be worth investigating, and re-learning the sensor. What have you got to lose? Plus, it properly fixes the timing cover leak.
    • The only problem I have seen this cause is longer crank times. 
    • Injector is being sent off today for rebuild and I estimate I'll have it back in 10 days or so.   It may not be the injector...of course...now that I've torn down the intake again. But, let's rule out the injector and replace those spider legs that have been almost rubbed through.   The truck has always had negative timing and I'm reading "normal" timing at warm idle should be +16 or so. I'm negative 16 to 25 or more, and it's always been like that since I bought it.   A light turned on upstairs last night in the old noggin. Rare, I know...   This will be wild, if it turns out to be the cause!   In 2001, according to the old service documentation, the muffler was replaced. Why? I have no idea, it wouldn't have been rusted through by then. But they did a crappy job.   In 2019, another shop replaced it and noted the prior install was poorly done on the work order. "Exhaust system vibrates on crossmember". Except...I guess they just left it be? I believe the husband, the couple who were original owners, had passed by then. Maybe she said it's just not worth it to have the exhaust system fixed and declined repairs. Very few miles were driven between 2019 and 2025.   The exhaust system vibrates heavily on the crossmember and you can feel it and REALLY hear it, even today. Not always, but at idle, it gets going pretty good sometimes.   What if....   ....What if that's enough to trigger one or both of the knock sensors? Could it be tricking the sensors into sensing knock, so it's pulling timing aggressively? Pulling timing heavily means it's firing after the piston reaches full height which means incomplete burn which means the O2 sensor is sensing a rich condition, which means I've been chasing my tail, and what I thought was an inconsequential problem (janky exhaust) has been THE issue for this truck for 25 solid years?   That would be wild. Maybe it IS wild.   The service documentation thereafter, for years, shows visits for rough idle, replacing O2's, replacing the cat, replacing plugs and wires, a misfire condition, like they could never solve the issue. The injector has been replaced 4 times in 80k miles, that's just crazy.   The secondary theory....   The engine has clearly had a leak at the front seal for a very long time (the greasy trench...). I think the truck changed hands quickly ~2025 because there's Napa receipts from someone I don't recognize in the ownership history. They apparently replaced the timing cover seal, and they did a terrible job. There's RTV smeared all over and the leak I had reduced to a weep by snugging the front oil pan bolts is now a leak again.   HOWEVER....I read about replacing the crankshaft position sensor. Any time the ckp sensor is disturbed or timing cover is removed, the truck requires relearning, and that can only be done through a bi-directional scan tool. Skippy with the RTV probably didn't do the relearn procedure is my guess. His scan tool is lost in a pile of RTV goo somewhere.   So, it's very possible the sensor has been disturbed and the truck is just running on the old learn data but not setting a code for anything. The distributor has since been replaced and so has the camshaft position sensor, so all bets are off for that thing.   In the theme of one step forward, two steps back, I returned the accumulator for the AC. The gal I've been working with at O'Really's has been great. She refunded it under manufacturer's defect and we compared it to the replacement I ordered, and sure enough, the replacement is machined very differently (and a gauge actually fits on it!).   Got it home, installed it, started vacuuming it down.... and I couldn't get good vacuum.   The high side service port, where I replaced the old GM ball valve suspecting that was a source of the previous leak....well, I've clearly exposed whatever pre-existing crack in the line where the service port is welded, and made it much worse. Blessing in disguise? Except there goes another $25, now I'm waiting for a replacement AC line.   In 10-ish days ALL the parts will be here. Rebuilt injector, new exhaust system, new cat, new high pressure AC line.   Oh, did I mention the squeaking ISN'T coming from the AC pump? The truck still squeaks when started, and there were words after I started it with the new AC pump installed. But, there was more to replacing the AC pump for just a squeak. A truck with good working AC is something of value, for the comfort alone.   I've ordered a new harmonic balancer because, 30 years is a good run for one of those. Rule it out. The squeak may be something more sinister, though. I'm worried about that ckp sensor and if it was shimmed correctly, or if the timing set was installed correctly. The squeak may be coming from UNDER the timing cover.   At this point, once I get it put back together, I'm thinking I'll take a 50 mile victory lap and then promptly put it up for sale. This truck is cursed. Betty, from beyond the grave, doesn't want anyone messing with her Blazer. Or maybe she's getting revenge for 30 years of shop visits with that thing.
    • 3.59 Kroger’s in Montgomery Tx. 20 cents higher than most around here. Very unusual. Saturday they were 3.49. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...