Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2011 silverado. I had a timing issue and took it to the dealership. They replaced the timing chain and tensioner. When I picked it up, the check engine light came on within a mile of the dealership. I brought it back to them and now they are saying the camshaft sprocket is bad and needs to be replaced but it's unrelated to the original repair. 

 

Shouldn't they have diagnosed the cam sprocket during the original repair since they had to touch it during the timing chain repair or an i missing something?

Posted

they should have replaced it when they did the chain, they probably had to remove it to do the chain anyway and may have damaged it in doing so. Squeaky wheel gets the grease, make a stink, you paid them to fix the timing problem and the gear is part of that

  • Like 2
Posted

Am not sure why these dealerships do not check their own work, test drive it more than say around the block and say all is good.  Go a few miles to ensure your work did not cause other issues and throw a CEL for crying out loud.  

Posted

I never heard of just changing ONE of the THREE components of the Timing chain (1) and gears (sprockets) large and small (2 and 3), I think Richard is (or formerly is) a dealer mechanic. He prolly knows whether or not the factory pays for a test drive. I can tell you I don't let my jobs go without a test drive, it's a good policy of CYA and to avoid embarrassment.

Posted

I always worked at the corner gas station that worked on every thing that rolled then had my own shop then heavy equipment mechanic never at the stealership.  the aftermarket timing sets come with everything not just a chain and tensioner  and that's what I replace when doing a tc job-EVERYTHING! who wants to do the job twice. I can't imagine why the dealer wouldn't change everything on a non warrantee job as this must have been unless they didn't have the parts in stock

Posted

every thing gets a test drive, it's a good way to sell more work and saves embarasment if there is a problem

Posted
On 4/23/2022 at 5:56 PM, richard wysong said:

they should have replaced it when they did the chain, they probably had to remove it to do the chain anyway and may have damaged it in doing so. Squeaky wheel gets the grease, make a stink, you paid them to fix the timing problem and the gear is part of that

Do you know if the official GM repair procedure requires charging or the gears?

Posted

I do not. was this a warrantee repair? if so then they might only replace what's defective but they should give you the option of paying for the other parts involved in a complete repair. the timing chain develops a wear pattern on the gears so when replacing the chain the gears should ALWAYS be replaced otherwise the new chain will cause accelerated wear to it and the gears

Posted
9 hours ago, richard wysong said:

I do not. was this a warrantee repair? if so then they might only replace what's defective but they should give you the option of paying for the other parts involved in a complete repair. the timing chain develops a wear pattern on the gears so when replacing the chain the gears should ALWAYS be replaced otherwise the new chain will cause accelerated wear to it and the gears

 

I have an extended warranty through an independent company, not through GM.  I think they just went off of recommendations from the dealership.  They are saying that it's not normal to change the gears and that they have no way of knowing they are bad unless a code gets generated.  Obviously they had to touch them to install the timing chain and I just assumed they would be changed with the timing chain.  I haven't been able to find out if GM recommends changing the gears or not in their official repair procedure.

Posted

they are feeding you a line of crap. it's not normal to change the chain without changing the gears. ask them to show you where it says it's not required. the only way it can throw a code is improper installation, damage caused during the chain service or excessive wear all which they are responsible for checking while servicing the chain. they screwed up and want you to pay! take it up the ladder to regional and corporate if you have to

Posted

Thank you for the information!  I've already filed a complaint with GM and I will ask them to show me why the gear shouldn't have been changed!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...