Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Where I used to live, in the city our neighbor bought a new truck every 3 years. He bought 11 trucks while we lived there, would be nice to have the money he lost.

The wife got a new car every 5 years.

 

In that time I had 2 trucks, bought used and ran to over 200k.

Th wife had 4 cars, 1 stolen, 1 totaled when it was rear ended, both high mileage vehicles.

Posted
7 minutes ago, diyer2 said:

Where I used to live, in the city our neighbor bought a new truck every 3 years. He bought 11 trucks while we lived there, would be nice to have the money he lost.

The wife got a new car every 5 years.

 

In that time I had 2 trucks, bought used and ran to over 200k.

Th wife had 4 cars, 1 stolen, 1 totaled when it was rear ended, both high mileage vehicles.

I’ve had a different vehicles every two years or more often since I started driving. Sometimes by trading, improving and selling. Or for work due to high driving miles. The toys were hobbies. My wife goes 5 years or more. The last one is a 2011 and is gem. Her toy is a 2001 and pristine. I have had the pleasure of owning some real classics. My latest toy is my avalanche. I look back with fondness and good memories. As far as hobbies go it wasn’t bad considering what my friends spent on boats, hunting, motorcycles, and motor homes. My hobbies now days is visiting casinos and playing cards with my wife. She’s not into car shows or drag racing. As it turns out a cheaper hobby. Even though I was pretty good at buying and selling cars. A man has to have a hobby. You just need to budget.

Posted
22 hours ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

Customboss -

 

I know a lot about some things but not so much about Petroleum Distillates…
 

What oil and filter do you favor? Do you think a magnet on the pan and or filter is worthwhile ?

 

Did you not read him say, "A filter is a screen door on a submarine"? They are pointless. GM wear study is bogus. 

Lubrication is the job of additives, not oil. He's experimenting with which ones. Viscosity is meaningless. Stribeck is obsolete? :wtf: 

 

He's told you what he thinks. Believe him! 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 4/23/2024 at 11:12 PM, NaturallyAspirated said:

Ha ha!!! 
 

I still don’t think he really thinks that…

 

what say you CustomBoss?

 

About what I thought.

 

 :lurk:

 

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
9 hours ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

Wow Grumpy Bear. You were right. 
 

oh well, just filled mine up with the usual M1 and M1 filter with FilterMag and plug magnet.

 

Allow me, please: @VicFirth posted the Lubrizol link a few days ago in another thread. 

 

Oil:

 

Can we see how inadequate the Dexos license is? API SP is worse. Porsche C30 is the toughest spec for *W30 oils. When you find an oil that on the bottle notes it covers C30, and SP you have your winner. Mobil 1 has a product or two in that category. But only a few. Same is true of the boutique oils. Not all Red Line, AMSOIL, HPL fluids will cover both, but each has at least one. Look at the Euro Oils. A few other self-oils as well. Mild to wild on pricing. Pick you poison.

 

Relative Performance Comparison Tool for Passenger Car Specifications - Engine Oil Additives - The Lubrizol Corporation

 

Play with the link. The Porsche spec for any gas motor oil is the highest standard. We may not know what is in our oil, but we do know that those that carry the spec have passed the actual test to carry it. 

 

Once you find one, verify the acid package can go the distance you are asking from it by UOA. Keep it over 3 bare minimum. 50% of new tested by the same lab and not the magazine value (different test). Don't buy into that run it into the dirt garbage Mcdonnall's labs push. 

 

image.png.e1b81be89ab2268b9a57c7ccf4586ddc.png

 

Filter: 

 

Purolator ONE, Fram XG, AMSOIL OE, Royal Purple are all a cut above the Mobil 1 filter, and some are half the price. Mobil-1 filters sacrifice efficiency for longevity. It's not horrible, it too expensive to be average. 

 

Filter Magnets: 

 

Iron, cobalt, things that are magnetic will be caught. Things that are not will not. If a motor is healthy, iron will be measured in part per million in the 5-to-10-micron range.  Smaller hurts little and larger 20/30 micron is something coming apart. (or early on break in and machining debris). The best argument for using one is iron is hard enough to potentially cause damage. Suspender and a belt. Hurts nothing. 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 4/22/2024 at 10:44 PM, NaturallyAspirated said:

Customboss -

 

I know a lot about some things but not so much about Petroleum Distillates…
 

What oil and filter do you favor? Do you think a magnet on the pan and or filter is worthwhile ?

Cheapest oil filter that fits and is reasonably well made. I try to match oil to engine. 
If you need magnets in a modern engine we have problems because not much besides cams, crank, and lifters  are gonna shed any ferritic materials. 

Posted
On 4/23/2024 at 9:37 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Did you not read him say, "A filter is a screen door on a submarine"? They are pointless. GM wear study is bogus. 

Lubrication is the job of additives, not oil. He's experimenting with which ones. Viscosity is meaningless. Stribeck is obsolete? :wtf: 

 

He's told you what he thinks. Believe him! 

 

 

 

 

 

Ur just jealous and for some reason I did not see the question which is not a surprise since Grumpy is dumping me on his threads? Cheap and insecure Grumpy that’s a bad combo. 

 

 

Posted

I'm sorry guys but you two are ridiculous. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, diyer2 said:

I'm sorry guys but you two are ridiculous. 

I did learn things initially. The horse has been beaten so hard the bones have disappeared. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, diyer2 said:

I'm sorry guys but you two are ridiculous. 

 

20 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I did learn things initially. The horse has been beaten so hard the bones have disappeared. 

 

 

Did you learn there is more than one way to 'CANCEL' the truth. :sigh:

 

Did you learn that when such an attempt fails the fallback it bury it in so much crap you can't see it? :wtf:

 

Did you lean most people never really care about it, just like to beat those bones? Ridiculous? 🤔

 

How useful would a tread be if the question asked was answered? Truth was relevant.   😱

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

 

 

Did you learn there is more than one way to 'CANCEL' the truth. :sigh:

 

Did you learn that when such an attempt fails the fallback it bury it in so much crap you can't see it? :wtf:

 

Did you lean most people never really care about it, just like to beat those bones? Ridiculous? 🤔

 

How useful would a tread be if the question asked was answered? Truth was relevant.   😱

 

 

Whaaaat???? Blah blah blah 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • While waiting for parts I have been working on installing the AC compressor, new accumulator, and orifice tube. Also changed out the high side ball valve (original). The orifice tube that was in there wasn't too bad. Slightly dirty, a little bit of junk, but not blocked. Glad I changed it out.   The accumulator, which should have been a 5 minute job, may have just burned $50. Put some PAG in it, wrote the date and mileage on the side, fresh o-rings and gooey'd up the threads and rings with Nylog. Got everything connected and snugged and was going to vacuum down the system, and....   My manifold gauge won't fit on the port. It's not an R12 service port. It LOOKS like an R134 service port but the diameter is a hair too large. There's a sticker on the accumulator that says it's designed to be used with R12 and R134a systems only. So it's not R1234yf. Even if I reduced the diameter slightly with a file, the shoulder on the port is too large so the quick-connect valve won't lock on. I'm stumped. It's going back, and 50/50 on if they'll give me a refund.   Also, I did a fuel pressure test.... Key on, the gauge spikes to about 60psi and quickly bleeds off, like 2psi per second. The fuel isn't going into the plenum, no smell, starts fine, so I'm guessing there's a bad check valve in the pump and the fuel is just draining back into the tank. oh, hell. But, it shouldn't be a problem, pump primes just fine and the truck starts right up. It just means I can't really ever use fuel pressure to verify a leak at the injector or intake.
    • Got this yesterday out of nowhere. Truck is a 25',6.6 gasser with 8k miles.  Only semi anomaly is that the truck had been sitting, uncranked for 6 days. Elec Stability Control showed immediately upon cranking, not while driving. No drivability issues, just the message. Battery didn't seem to be weak when cranking over.  I drove it, killed it, let it sit a few hrs with no avail.  Truck is 100% stock. No damage. 
    • This can be done.  It is not cheap and requires an instrument cluster swap with custom programming, new steering wheel with the controls on it, and a special jumper harness.   The cluster upgrade - 12.3” Digital Cluster Upgrade – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The wheel upgrade - Steering Wheel Upgrade Kit – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The column harness upgrade - 2019 - 2026 Silverado / Sierra: Steering Wheel LIN Bus Harness - Harness Dr. - DIY Done Right     The problem with doing all of this?  You pretty much can't have any programming done to your truck that involves the cluster ever again.  The dealer won't be able to program the cluster as GM's system will only pull data for the cluster the truck came with.  So it would be advised also to turn off over the air updates.   TLDR;  Should have bought an LT double cab?  You'd have a power seat, the wheel controls, the cluster, all things that you've been seeking in your various posts so far about your new WT regular cab.  
    • I was unaware of that, thanks for updating me.
    • Yes.  The 2.7 Turbomax has Active Fuel Management.  It is NOT the same as the V8s.  Totally different system.     Here is an article from GM when the 2.7 came out explaining the cylinder deactivation and the valve lift system.  Starts at the section called "SCS Valvetrain":   New Turbocharged 2.7L 4-Cylinder Engine Powers Full-Size Trucks – TechLink         This is an internet myth going around.  It was alleged that some 5.3s had this mystical 8th digit of the VIN as an "E" which somehow meant it had a new one year only 5.3 that didn't have DFM.  The writer of said article and the person that made the claim conveniently can't count because they posted the VIN.  The 8th digit was a "D" which meant its still the 5.3 with DFM.  The 9th digit of the VIN was an "E" and the 9th digit isn't the engine code.  At all.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...