Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

When I got the truck back in April I had originally planned to go the ARE or Leer route but with a 3+ month wait time, and being in the middle of a cross country move, I had to wait even longer.  After seeing the SmartCap for the first time back in June on a Ranger, I knew that this was the cap I wanted and was able to convince the wife, who wasn't a big fan of the bed cap idea to begin with because she thinks they're just for old men trucks.  Powder coated stainless and the large gull-wing side doors were big attractors to me.  Unfortunately, there is a long back-log on getting these as well.  I placed my order around the 2nd of July and it showed up to my door the 31st of October.  

 

Some assembly is required, but its like playing with a really advanced set of legos.  I've got three kids ages 3-8 so I've had ample opportunity to tune up my lego skills since I had been out of practice for a decade or two, and was able to assemble this in an afternoon and then recruit some neighbors to help lift it on the truck.

 

I wasn't able to find many good pictures of what it looks like on the 2500 prior to purchase so I thought I'd put these up here for anyone else considering one of these.

 

 

IMG_0284.jpg

 

IMG_0282.jpg

IMG_0295.jpg

IMG_0291.jpg

IMG_0290.jpg

Edited by c0wb0y84
  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, c0wb0y84 said:

When I got the truck back in April I had originally planned to go the ARE or Leer route but with a 3+ month wait time, and being in the middle of a cross country move, I had to wait even longer.  After seeing the SmartCap for the first time back in June on a Ranger, I knew that this was the cap I wanted and was able to convince the wife, who wasn't a big fan of the bed cap idea to begin with because she thinks they're just for old men trucks.  Powder coated stainless and the large gull-wing side doors were big attractors to me.  Unfortunately, there is a long back-log on getting these as well.  I placed my order around the 2nd of July and it showed up to my door the 31st of October.  

 

Some assembly is required, but its like playing with a really advanced set of legos.  I've got three kids ages 3-8 so I've had ample opportunity to tune up my lego skills since I had been out of practice for a decade or two, and was able to assemble this in an afternoon and then recruit some neighbors to help lift it on the truck.

 

I wasn't able to find many good pictures of what it looks like on the 2500 prior to purchase so I thought I'd put these up here for anyone else considering one of these.

 

 

IMG_0284.jpg

 

IMG_0282.jpg

IMG_0295.jpg

IMG_0291.jpg

IMG_0290.jpg

Looks very nice and well built. What does it do exactly? The website says it’s a five piece cap? I see it’s all stainless which is nice but 4k plus is a lot for a cap so what does it do exactly?

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Pryme said:

Looks very nice and well built. What does it do exactly? The website says it’s a five piece cap? I see it’s all stainless which is nice but 4k plus is a lot for a cap so what does it do exactly?

It does pretty much exactly what fiberglass truck caps do but in stainless.  SmartCap is kind of a silly name for it.  It comes in five pieces so it can ship direct to my door for a lot less that trying to get a single piece cap to my door.  Since the closest place that I could get an A.R.E or Leer is two hours away and the base price of the fiberglass caps available to me from them start at $3,000 before adding sliding flip up windows $$, roof rack rails $ and such and then paying for installation $$, the cost difference was negligible and saved me the gas and time for a 4 hour round trip to get it $$$.  

Edited by c0wb0y84
Posted
10 hours ago, c0wb0y84 said:

It does pretty much exactly what fiberglass truck caps do but in stainless.  SmartCap is kind of a silly name for it.  It comes in five pieces so it can ship direct to my door for a lot less that trying to get a single piece cap to my door.  Since the closest place that I could get an A.R.E or Leer is two hours away and the base price of the fiberglass caps available to me from them start at $3,000 before adding sliding flip up windows $$, roof rack rails $ and such and then paying for installation $$, the cost difference was negligible and saved me the gas and time for a 4 hour round trip to get it $$$.  

Makes sense. Should last forever being stainless. 

Posted

Man, that is a nice cap! I can see why you like it.  It looks really sturdy.  Almost like an enclosed truck rack.  Looks like you can put a pretty substantial rack on top if you want.

This hits a sweet spot for me, as I want a truck to work like a truck, otherwise I'd get an SUV.   Had never heard of this company before your thread.

And for something that requires assembly the shut lines look perfect.  Was that something you had to work at, or does it just go together that well?

 

Very nice! :cheers:

 

Posted

Thanks!  The claim is it can hold 700 lbs static and 350 dynamic.  It seems that they were designed with offroad camping in mind for people who like the roof mounted tents and such, based on the pics on the website.  I'm shopping for a wide heavy duty rack for hauling a couple of big canoes up there while camping.  Their rack bars aren't quite wide enough for what I'm looking for and as such whatever I end up with will probably have to be put on just when I need it so that it doesn't interfere with the side doors opening on a day to day basis.  That and I'll need a bar to go over the cab and match the height.  I'm not sure which direction I'll go for that yet.

 

Everything was pretty close tolerances fitting together.  Not too hard to screw up but it did take some effort working the pieces in together.  Their instructions are good so as long as you follow them then it will turn out good.

  • Like 1
  • 2 years later...
Posted (edited)

I still really like it and glad I went this route.  I've added some yakima HD bars for hauling canoes and the built in rails are nice for that.  I got the 78" wide bars and they don't interfere with the sides opening up, which was something I was concerned about.  While driving you're not gonna be able to see much out of the side windows so I don't think that would really matter much vs solid but I would still pick with the windows bc even though they're tinted I like being able to look in without having to open the door to see if what I'm looking for is there or not.  There's also some threaded anchor points on the roof inside which I've found pretty handy.  The thing is rock sold!

 

The locks are a bit stiff and can freeze when the temp drops but I usually leave them unlocked so it's not a big deal to me.  The wiring for the CHMSL was kind of a pain bc it had to run all the way back from under the drivers side dash.  RSI also recommends checking the torque on the nuts every so often but I put loctite on during assembly so no problem there for me.

 

I get lots of compliments and questions about it for sure.

IMG_2228.jpeg

Edited by c0wb0y84
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...