Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

ok im sorry I have to start one more threat on tires, but this one is just for NITTO RIDGE GRAPPLER, so if you have those tires I need your input, traction on wet snow and how happy you are with the tire noise and smoothest of the tires, thanks !!

Posted (edited)

You have got to be kidding me, and why are you yelling? You post up asking about the quietest AT tire then post asking about these tires that are one of the most aggressive hybrid tires (a cross between an AT and MT). So you aren't worried about quiet, these will perform just like the Goodyears on your truck, same class and aggressiveness. When they wear, they will hum. 

 

Search too, tons of info out there about there, not every question needs a new thread...

 

A few of the many out there already.

 

 

Tyler

Edited by Amcguy1970
  • Like 1
Posted

Trash, absolute trash.

 

Or F***ing garbage is another way to put it. Making new threads for this crap is annoying.

Posted
4 hours ago, Amcguy1970 said:

You have got to be kidding me, and why are you yelling? You post up asking about the quietest AT tire then post asking about these tires that are one of the most aggressive hybrid tires (a cross between an AT and MT). So you aren't worried about quiet, these will perform just like the Goodyears on your truck, same class and aggressiveness. When they wear, they will hum. 

 

Search too, tons of info out there about there, not every question needs a new thread...

 

A few of the many out there already.

 

 

Tyler

lol I copy and paste something and cap stays big ,I have a friend that uses this tires and said that the noise is not bad wet traction is just ok not great snow traction average , only reason I am asking about this tires is because I found a set in stock in local store, nothing else that I like is in stock everything is special order....

Posted
3 hours ago, CamGTP said:

Trash, absolute trash.

 

Or F***ing garbage is another way to put it. Making new threads for this crap is annoying.

thanks for your input on the tires and  it is annoying but also a little fun, ...relax fellow its FRIDAY !! lol have a beer..cheers.

Posted

They are not great in wet/snow but they have worn well and are not noisy, in my opinion.  I think they look good but that isn’t enough…  I’ll be going back to DuraTrac tires, they were great in low traction including wet and snow!

Posted
16 hours ago, CamGTP said:

Trash, absolute trash.

 

Or F***ing garbage is another way to put it. Making new threads for this crap is annoying.

 

 

Its the user formerly known as "FJB" but he finally got a truck and when he did, he changed is user name.  That explains the 4 posts a day asking questions.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, newdude said:

 

 

Its the user formerly known as "FJB" but he finally got a truck and when he did, he changed is user name.  That explains the 4 posts a day asking questions.  

what's wrong with asking questions, I thought this forum is here for the users to ask question and socialize chit chat about the trucks , do you miss my old user name , it's catchy ain't it ? FJB Frederick Jake Brewster 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Big_Kahuna said:

what's wrong with asking questions, I thought this forum is here for the users to ask question and socialize chit chat about the trucks , do you miss my old user name , it's catchy ain't it ? FJB Frederick Jake Brewster 

 

I thought your real name was Brandon as it goes with your hairy blonde legs! 🤣

Posted
3 minutes ago, Steve-2019 said:

 

I thought your real name was Brandon as it goes with your hairy blonde legs! 🤣

yes it is 😏 , FJB IS my GRANDPA  initials  his name was Frederick Jake Brewster 😉

Posted
5 hours ago, Big_Kahuna said:

what's wrong with asking questions, I thought this forum is here for the users to ask question and socialize chit chat about the trucks , do you miss my old user name , it's catchy ain't it ? FJB Frederick Jake Brewster 

 

 

Nothing wrong with asking questions.  Its the delivery in which you ask them.  You already started a tire thread complaining about the ones that came with the truck, so no need to start a second thread asking about a specific tire.

 

Your other thread should have been (in TLDR format) "these OE tires suck.  Does anyone have any recommendations for a replacement tire to swap to?  I was looking at XX brand, any good?  Does anyone have suggestions?"

 

But instead its a stream of new posts, mostly in CAPS LOCK.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

Nothing wrong with asking questions.  Its the delivery in which you ask them.  You already started a tire thread complaining about the ones that came with the truck, so no need to start a second thread asking about a specific tire.

 

Your other thread should have been (in TLDR format) "these OE tires suck.  Does anyone have any recommendations for a replacement tire to swap to?  I was looking at XX brand, any good?  Does anyone have suggestions?"

 

But instead its a stream of new posts, mostly in CAPS LOCK.

but why are you concerned what I do, this is the part I don't understand, this is public forum everyone can post what they want, why are you bend out of shape what I post on here....? its easy you see my post don't enter it problem solved, why do you have to go after me what I post on here? are you forum police ? my understanding is the more people post the better is for the forums, if nobody post anything this page will shot down , what the problem is ?

Posted

I'm sure some of us wonder if that's how you carry out your everyday life though.

 

It's like when I was a mechanic, if the vehicle was filthy, makes you wonder if their house was too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,829 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...