Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

Great thread. 

It is. Sorry for the derail @Jettech1 but I'd like to know more about the TPMS you installed. Do tell. Please.

 

I found that for me about 400 miles towing the TT was my limit with our old rig. I wonder if not stressing about a 20+ year old tow rig will change that metric. My wife wasn't volunteering very hard to drive before. I'm reluctant to give up the wheel anyway. But camping hasn't started for us and she's already mentioned wanting to drive the new rig. So I imagine having a pinch hitter may extend the driving day.

 

Topic is relevant to our future plans with the new truck. A one way 1500 mile trip is in the works. Keep it updated. Our TT is just under 8k loaded. A close comparison. I'd like to read first hand experience what towing with the new truck is like...

Edited by IDBrett
added info
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, IDBrett said:

It is. Sorry for the derail @Jettech1 but I'd like to know more about the TPMS you installed. Do tell. Please.

 

I found that for me about 400 miles towing the TT was my limit with our old rig. I wonder if not stressing about a 20+ year old tow rig will change that metric. My wife wasn't volunteering very hard to drive before. I'm reluctant to give up the wheel anyway. But camping hasn't started for us and she's already mentioned wanting to drive the new rig. So I imagine having a pinch hitter may extend the driving day.

 

Topic is relevant to our future plans with the new truck. A one way 1500 mile trip is in the works. Keep it updated. Our TT is just under 8k loaded. A close comparison. I'd like to read first hand experience what towing with the new truck is like...

Absolutely will keep you all updated.  As to the TPMS system, we bought the TST 507 with the Marine sensors because it was 110 off normal price.  It's back up to normal price but just keep an eye on it because they have big price drops on occasion.  One downfall with the Marine sensors is that when the battery goes bad you just throw them away and buy another sensor.  Typical life expectancy is about 2 years.  I'm not sure if the marine sensors put out more of a signal than the other ones because I didn't have to worry about installing the repeater.  They work perfect as is....here's the link to the ones I bought

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07Y9NTZ7C/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1 

 

I've only had a chance to use it once so far and it's worth every damn penny!!!  I love it and the peace of mind that comes with it.

Edited by Jettech1
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

 

6 hours ago, Jettech1 said:

One downfall with the Marine sensors is that when the battery goes bad you just throw them away and buy another sensor.  Typical life expectancy is about 2 years.

@IDBrett I'm going to do more research on the marine/hybrid tpms sensors.  TST claims the batteries can't be replaced, I'm thinking that might not be totally accurate.  I priced them out at $51 each, so if you decide to go with the TST system, of which I highly recommend, you might want to go with the regular cap sensors that have replaceable batteries.  The only reason I bought the marine ones was because they had a 110 dollar discount but that may have been a short sighted decision on my part.

Edited by Jettech1
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

We just made a very similar drive from Mass to Florida a couple of weeks ago. We moved down here and i was towing my enclosed trailer with about 4k in it with my half ton. We did it in 3 days, if i had a do over i think i would stretch it to 4. We had our dogs with us so we were stopping every couple of hours for a break for both them and us. Our days ended up about 11 total hours between hotels which I feel like was too much. I feel like the extra day would have got us into the 8 hours on the road range which would have been better for me I was pretty tired after day 3. The truck was fine, no issues there and pretty relaxed driving it was just a lot of it.... 

 

We have plans to RV full time once we get our rig and truck( hopefully in a week or two on the truck) and we are already thinking we don't want to drive much more than 350 miles in a day.  

 

Edited by nitro882
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, nitro882 said:

We just made a very similar drive from Mass to Florida a couple of weeks ago. We moved down here and i was towing my enclosed trailer with about 4k in it with my half ton. We did it in 3 days, if i had a do over i think i would stretch it to 4. We had our dogs with us so we were stopping every couple of hours for a break for both them and us. Our days ended up about 11 total hours between hotels which I feel like was too much. I feel like the extra day would have got us into the 8 hours on the road range which would have been better for me I was pretty tired after day 3. The truck was fine, no issues there and pretty relaxed driving it was just a lot of it.... 

 

We have plans to RV full time once we get our rig and truck( hopefully in a week or two on the truck) and we are already thinking we don't want to drive much more than 350 miles in a day.  

 

This is great information.  Thank you so much..  Where in Mass did you move from?  I lived in Chelmsford while I was going to tech school back in the mid 80's

 

Edited by Jettech1
Posted
3 hours ago, Jettech1 said:

This is great information.  Thank you so much..  Where in Mass did you move from?  I lived in Chelmsford while I was going to tech school back in the mid 80's

 

 

I lived in Holliston which is just south of Framingham. I had lived in that general area my whole life until now....

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, nitro882 said:

 

I lived in Holliston which is just south of Framingham. I had lived in that general area my whole life until now....

I know where Framingham is and I honestly have never heard of Holliston.... but so cool that you are moving to Florida....I have no doubt you will love it...lots of humidity....but humidity to me is easy to deal with.....better than cold ass temps...lol...

 

Edited by Jettech1
Posted
3 hours ago, Jettech1 said:

I know where Framingham is and I honestly have never heard of Holliston.... but so cool that you are moving to Florida....I have no doubt you will love it...lots of humidity....but humidity to me is easy to deal with.....better than cold ass temps...lol...

 

Holliston is a tiny little town between Framingham and Milford. Its one of those if you blink you miss it kind of places but a very nice place to live. In a lot of ways i'm going to miss it but i am not going to miss winter that's for sure. Right now we are in St Pete and not too far from the gulf, like a 5 min ride form St Pete beach. With the constant sea breeze i have not noticed the humidity yet but there is still time....

 

Once we get the truck and RV the plan is to be in the RV full time and we probably wont be down here in the summer after this year.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

If I havent mentioned it before I can say with confidence that you want to avoid the Tirelinc system. It is absolute junk. It was difficult to setup (nothing in the instructions actually matched what the unit wanted) and the system false alarmed repeatedly for no reason. The app is glitchy (a Lippert trademark) and unreliable. I only used it twice with bad results and the final straw was when I went to use it a few months after the initial issues and found 2 of the sensors corroded so badly they were ruined (my trailer is stored in my insulated and heated pole barn). Its absolute junk. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, 64BAwagon said:

If I havent mentioned it before I can say with confidence that you want to avoid the Tirelinc system. It is absolute junk. It was difficult to setup (nothing in the instructions actually matched what the unit wanted) and the system false alarmed repeatedly for no reason. The app is glitchy (a Lippert trademark) and unreliable. I only used it twice with bad results and the final straw was when I went to use it a few months after the initial issues and found 2 of the sensors corroded so badly they were ruined (my trailer is stored in my insulated and heated pole barn). Its absolute junk. 

There was another person (or perhaps it was you) a while back that said exactly what you just did of which saved me a lot of time and money by going with TST.

Posted

Any big trip for us I plan on roughly five hundred miles per day. 

 

That usually lets us take breaks without being rushed. Traffic jams aren't as much of a worry, getting in and out of the overnight stay isn't as rushed. We can leave in the mornings more leisurely, break downs aren't as stressful, etc.

 

Its so much easier to deal with the unexpected when you aren't also on a tight schedule. 

 

Junk RV tires are a major source of issues...

  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, asilverblazer said:

Any big trip for us I plan on roughly five hundred miles per day. 

 

That usually lets us take breaks without being rushed. Traffic jams aren't as much of a worry, getting in and out of the overnight stay isn't as rushed. We can leave in the mornings more leisurely, break downs aren't as stressful, etc.

 

Its so much easier to deal with the unexpected when you aren't also on a tight schedule. 

 

Junk RV tires are a major source of issues...

That's an impressive amount of miles per day.  Luckily we've got plenty of time for this whole trip, 3 weeks so we don't have to run too hard.  65mph tops is all I plan on running.  Also we have the goodyear endurance tires on our camper so hopefully we will be issue free.  Thank you for your reply!!! 

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, asilverblazer said:

Any big trip for us I plan on roughly five hundred miles per day. 

 

That usually lets us take breaks without being rushed. Traffic jams aren't as much of a worry, getting in and out of the overnight stay isn't as rushed. We can leave in the mornings more leisurely, break downs aren't as stressful, etc.

 

Its so much easier to deal with the unexpected when you aren't also on a tight schedule. 

 

Junk RV tires are a major source of issues...

So you’re calling a leisurely trip pulling a camper 500 miles per day. I’m a planner that comes from driving 50k miles a year. It could be my age but most RV drivers are older. My trips start early with minimal stops mostly rest area’s because of quickness. Usually one gas stop two quick drive throughs. Speedometer set between 72-74. Around 450 miles pulling into my destination ready to stop. That’s in my comfortable easy driving non RV pulling vehicle. From my 20s to 40s I was pulling something. There’s wasn’t anything leisurely about it.  You couldn’t pay me to do it today. Hampton here I come. Leisurely and RVing, nooooo. But hey go for it, have fun.😵‍💫

Edited by KARNUT
  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

Hampton here I come.

LMAO!!!  🤣

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

So you’re calling a leisurely trip pulling a camper 500 miles per day.

Yes... Give or take 8-9 hours on the road, slightly situated later in the day. Leaving 9-10 and arriving mid evening (before dark). Roughly four pit stops along the way. One right after we pull out, a lunch stop, an afternoon stop and an early evening stop. The pets and passenger princesses... most stops are a minimum 20 minutes, lunch is usually an hour. 

 

Interstate travel too, so speeds 70-75 with most stops right off the highway.

 

Most of our family are the 'drive straight through' type... starting a 4am no stops...

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,913
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Smitty462
    Newest Member
    Smitty462
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 651 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...