Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 hours ago, MeatEater23 said:

I should mention that two weeks ago I had a flashing airbag light on my dash, my mirror compass and thermostat display was freaking out and my radio was cutting in and out. Not sure if this helps any. That only happened once though.

When this happened there were internal BCM codes generated.  These may shed some light on the problem but my money is on that positive battery cable.

Posted

Sadly the last GM tech cleared all codes after he tried a few things but it very well could he the positive cable since the terminal end is indeed shimmed. There is enough slack to splice the end and put a new end of there. Is it worth cutting that end and putting a new end on the cable?

If so, which kind of end should I opt for? I probably don't want two separate ends for the battery cables, right? 

Posted

Replace the cable, Repair terminals are a temporary repair and do not address internal corrosion. it sounds like you are just looking at the battery end of the cable but if it is indeed the cable causing your issues the problem may be further down the cable

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I am certainly willing to try this. I think the last time I checked, the positive cables are about 60 to 70 dollars. 

Posted

Being it's an 07 I would replace both battery cables. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

The negative cable was done about 3 years ago. One shop sword the negative cable was the culprit for all of my issues. Sadly, they were wrong as the issues persisted immediately after. 

Posted
5 hours ago, MeatEater23 said:

Sadly the last GM tech cleared all codes after he tried a few things but it very well could he the positive cable since the terminal end is indeed shimmed. There is enough slack to splice the end and put a new end of there. Is it worth cutting that end and putting a new end on the cable?

If so, which kind of end should I opt for? I probably don't want two separate ends for the battery cables, right? 

 

Replace the whole positive battery cable, the ends are not the problem man.

  • Like 1
Posted

After doing some reading some claim the majority of corrosion is found right inside of the crimp. Some had great success with just doing the end but I will try the entire cable. 

RockAuto has 2 positive cables, I'll look under my hood this morning and make sure I order the correct one. 

 

Isn't there some sort of voltage test or drop test I can perform to see if its in fact the cable?

  • Like 1
Posted
17 hours ago, MeatEater23 said:

After doing some reading some claim the majority of corrosion is found right inside of the crimp. Some had great success with just doing the end but I will try the entire cable. 

RockAuto has 2 positive cables, I'll look under my hood this morning and make sure I order the correct one. 

 

Isn't there some sort of voltage test or drop test I can perform to see if its in fact the cable?

Well, you could test for ohms of resistance if you know what a good value is.  I tend to overthink things but battery cables wasn't one of them!  LOL

 

Let me see...  A quick look through the shop manual does not show anything like that to test for.

Posted

I'm sure there is a voltage drop test I could perform but I cannot find what values to expect in doing so.

 

Either way, is this another vote for replacing the battery cable? 

 

Yesterday I went ahead and checked over the junction box under the truck and unplug thr harness connections and all of them looked clean and they were snug. I also checked the bcm connections along with the brake switch. 

 

I read that there is a ground to the left of the steering column under the knee bolster. I plan to look into this asap. 

I should mention that we live in the North where our roads get pounded with rock salt. Needless to say, our trucks get rusty. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Cut the insulation off the old cables after you replace them.  Then you'll see what we mean.

Edited by swathdiver
grammar
Posted

Being the negative cable was replaced not long ago (years ago now) I may just replace the positive cable. If that doesn't do it, perhaps I'll get another negative cable and pray for the best.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I haven't seen diesel for less than $5.30 anywhere in my area
    • The not as clean as one would assume theme with the new engine oil, that reminds me of comments over the years with mechanics not always being so on board with filling an oil filter, not from the center anyway due to that typically being the clean side of the filter, danger of some contaminant falling into the filter if not careful but the realization now that the oil may not be as pure as one had assumed it would surely be. Yes it would be possible to fill from the small holes but that means messing with something to prop open the anti drain back valve if the filter is so equipped and not damage that valve in the process. Me, I have hardly ever prefilled an engine oil filter however I have prefilled diesel fuel filters with a filter on a fuel bulk tank and for anyone that has messed with diesel engines with filters and units that have a limited or no way of priming them, putting on a dry filter is a bad day to say the least with those crappy systems. But anyway back to not so clean engine oil, indeed perhaps its not so bad after all that I have not made a practice of prefilling oil filters.    As Grumpy Bear commented on keeping things clean, that I really have to wonder what the typical practice is at a dealer or any other shop that changes engine oil, do they make sure to wipe or wash off the oil plug and certainly if it fell into some gunk or onto a dirty floor, or that they wiped the filter mounting flange and didn't go and use some dirty rag and end up adding dirt to the inside of the head of the filter mount. Or be careless in how they stored or handled the new filter and if they were bumping into items under the vehicle with the filter opening facing up and having dirt drop right into the filter and if so right into the threaded center that is on the clean side. The top side, did they clean away the built up gunk that may be around the filler before removing the cap or to be really careful at that point that something right close to the filler hole that was hidden under the caps flange won't fall into the engine. Or did they clean the funnel or was that just laying there covered in oil from the oil change before and dust kicked up from sweeping the floor stuck to the oil and now that will go running into the next persons engine due to just not cleaning the funnel as "they won't know anyway" attitude as that young guy is more worried about taking a break so he can go outside and smoke a joint. Just random points that came to mind when I think about what some hired personnel may do that the shop foreman has no idea of or perhaps the whole attitude of some shops may be "eh ... who cares, they will never know the difference anyway".  
    • $3.69 for 87 octane.   $4.24 for Diesel in town.
    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...