Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently go new tires put on my 2023 Sierra 1500 Elevation Crew Cab with the 5.3L.  They are rated for a max psi of 80 and that is what the dealer put in them.  The truck is now riding super firm and I can basically feel every crack I drive over.  I know the door placard calls for a psi of closer to 35.  Where should I be?  What it harm the tires to go down to 50 or 60? Thanks in advance!

Posted

Holy crap at 80 unloaded you must need a helmet to stop from hitting the roof!  I'd put them closer to what the recommendation is inside the door.  I usually put mine around 37 or so cold and adjust that as the temps change here in MN.  Good luck!

Posted (edited)

What size are they?

 

Both the 275/60R20 and the 255/70R17 trucks list 35psi on their door stickers. I fill mine cold to 33 and they warm up to 35.

Here's a chart  you can use as a guide in case you load your truck down

 

TirePressureChart.jpg

Edited by TrueBlue
Posted

Google the Chalk Tire Test, best way to find the proper PSI for your tires with the current load. Sounds like you have "E" rated tires, I ran mine at 38-40 PSI on my 19 High Country, I found that to be the sweet spot.

Posted
1 hour ago, drewensley said:

I put a 4" lift on it so they are 295/60/20 Mickey Thompson Baja Boss A/T tires

 

For proper tire inflation on Mickey Thompson Tires, please contact M/T Tech Department at 800-222-9092 (Option 5) with original tire size and stock tire pressure. (The front and rear stock tire pressure can be found on the driver door placard/sticker)

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

@drewensley   Chalk test as mentioned is a good move but more importantly, inflating to equal the load rating of the factory tire is as well.  

 

E load tires give you much more pressure range to equal out to the factory P tires.  

 

Toyo tires has a great chart on this explaining the proper PSI to get the equivalent load ratings on an LT C, D or E load tire to the correct load index in lbs that can be matched to the tire it replaced.

 

So.  GM uses 275/60R20 for 20 inch wheels.  Both tires are a 115 load index, so the weight the tire can support at xx PSI.  115 index = 2679lbs at 35psi.  

 

LT295/60R20 in Mickey Thompson (and Toyo as well) are E load.  Load index is 126.  126 = 3750lbs at 80psi.  So using the Toyo chart and scaling down to 2679lbs load, that puts your target inflation pressure between 45-50psi to obtain the proper load index to match the original equipment tires.  

 

TLDR.  Try 45-50psi and see how it rides.  This PSI will give you the right load range to the original tires as well.  Don't go lower IMO unless you haul nothing but you in the truck.  Towing or extra passengers, air them up to 45-50psi minimum.    

 

Charts I used - Application of Load Inflation Tables Version 2020-7 (toyotires.com)

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

 

Door sticker recommendation is for pressure when the tires are cold.

 

It is also the pressure for  if the vehicle is carrying it's max rated load. 

 

If the vehicle is driven unloaded, or lightly loaded then the 'best' pressure will be less than the door sticker pressure.

(I get that most don't bother to get scale weight and find a 'load vs inflation' table for the tire size and load rating to find how much pressure can be reduced)

 

Tire makers know pressures increase when they've been run.

It would be near impossible to establish pressure for after driving since the time driven, speeds driven and load carried will all impact how much the pressure rises from the cold pressure. 

 

 

Posted
On 10/18/2023 at 3:53 PM, redwngr said:

 

Door sticker recommendation is for pressure when the tires are cold.

 

It is also the pressure for  if the vehicle is carrying it's max rated load. 

 

If the vehicle is driven unloaded, or lightly loaded then the 'best' pressure will be less than the door sticker pressure.

(I get that most don't bother to get scale weight and find a 'load vs inflation' table for the tire size and load rating to find how much pressure can be reduced)

 

Tire makers know pressures increase when they've been run.

It would be near impossible to establish pressure for after driving since the time driven, speeds driven and load carried will all impact how much the pressure rises from the cold pressure. 

 

 

Keep in mind that door sticker only applies to the factory brand and size of tires. 

Posted

The door sticker indicates the "original equipment tires" and has a specified minimum PSI to carry the vehicles maximum load capacity. You'll note that the sticker does not indicate a brand or model of tire. Interestingly, the only deviation from the specified PSI addressed in the owners manual is for sustained high speed driving over 100 mph, where the PSI should be raised by 3 over cold.

 

The tire has a maximum PSI for the tire.

Posted
4 hours ago, lennybg said:

Keep in mind that door sticker only applies to the factory brand and size of tires. 

Of course.

 

And the info on the tire is max pressure and load for the tire, not for the vehicle it is installed on.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, redwngr said:

Of course.

 

And the info on the tire is max pressure and load for the tire, not for the vehicle it is installed on.

Important point, yes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...