Jump to content

If you install the trans dipstick, will it void your warranty?

Jettech1
 Share

Recommended Posts

Pryme Senior Enthusiast

Pryme

Posted
Posted (edited)

I had to make this quick video. Next the manufacturer will cut more costs and force more people into the overpriced dealership to check and change their oil too and of course say that it’s just easier to lay under the truck in the dirt to check your oil too. That’s the new age we live in. Just say something enough times and it becomes true.  
 

not too long ago every vehicle had a trans dipstick. Now almost none. Imagine telling a mechanic 20 years ago “ oh it’s just easier to lay under the truck to check this fluid. Don’t pull that dipstick” he would think you lost your mind. 
 

My daughter’s 2010 fusion has a trans dipstick. Just checked it the other day when I did the oil. Quick and easy. 
 


 

 

Edited by Pryme
  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

64BAwagon
64BAwagon

Very complex subject. I am typing on my cell phone so I will be as brief as possible.  The OEM must show that the mod created or worsened the issue. In reality a lot depends on your dealer and th

diyer2
diyer2

I would do it if you're going to keep this truck a long time for maintenance convivence if you do the maintenance. Void the warranty? The entire truck or the trans?  Chances are if you service th

rdonarski
rdonarski

My cousin spent his career as a service manager at a big GMC garage. He told me once that the dealer has the ability to warranty anything whether it's technically still under warranty or not. Totally

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted (edited)
52 minutes ago, Pryme said:

So this would only apply to someone who drained and refilled based on the dipstick reading. If someone does the mod on a factory stock truck, the level is already set from the manufacturer.

 

 

 

No.  GM did not put the stick and tube there from the factory, therefore it can't be considered an approved method to check the fluid level.  

 

The check plug in the pan is the ONLY approved method.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
Pryme Senior Enthusiast

Pryme

Posted
Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

No.  GM did not put the stick and tube there from the factory, therefore it can't be considered an approved method to check the fluid level.  

 

The check plug in the pan is the ONLY approved method.  

Yes I understand that. What I’m saying is until someone actually changes their fluid, it’s still the factory fluid in the transmission. Having a dipstick inserted doesn’t change the level that was pre filled in the truck. 
 

once someone does a drain and fill and then uses the dipstick to check level, it would be what you’re talking about. 
 

thing is, it is very easy to see the level is correct so this whole thing is for moot because it is reading correctly. 

Edited by Pryme
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, newdude said:

 

 

The proof would be on the customer to prove that their added part is accurate in the level check of the fluid.  GM engineered a different pan with the fluid level check plug and stem pipe that is set to the level.  The dispstick add is an alteration to the vehicle done after final assembly, and these trucks are now designed and engineered to use the pan plug as the fluid set method.    

 

Its really easy on the OEM do deny warranty repair on this one for transmission failure or shift driveability concerns because an unapproved method was used to "set the fluid level" of the transmission therefore can't be considered accurate.  Every forum and Facebook group loves the ol' Magnuson Moss defense but its not always applied or interpreted right.  

 

static.nhtsa.gov/odi/tsbs/2023/MC-10242206-0001.pdf

 

What Is Not Covered

 

 

Damage Due to Accident, Misuse, or Alteration

The New Vehicle Limited Warranty does not cover damage caused as the result of any of the following:

 

  • Collision, fire, theft, freezing, vandalism, riot, explosion, or objects striking the vehicle
  • Misuse of the vehicle such as driving over curbs, overloading, racing, or other competition. Proper vehicle use is discussed in the owner manual.
  • Alteration, modification, or tampering to the vehicle, including, but not limited to the body, chassis, powertrain, driveline, software, or other components after final assembly by GM.
  • Coverages do not apply if the odometer has been disconnected, its reading has been altered, or mileage cannot be determined.
  • Installation of non-GM (General Motors) parts
  • Water or fluid contamination
  • Damage resulting from hail, floods, windstorms, lightning, and other environmental conditions
  • Alteration of glass parts by application of tinting films

 

Is adding a factory part that was deleted from the exact same assembly really a modification? 😏 Okay, let's say they win that one. Here's my personal warranty to guarantee.

 

You don't stand behind what you sold I guarantee you don't sell to me again. How's that for a warranty? 

 

Now people will argue that my refusal will have no impact on GM. Ask Mc Donnal's how that strategy is working out for them? It's called an 'Economic Vote". One wins nothing. Keep screwing people long enough and those votes start eating your lunch. Micky D's is in the process of walking that attitude back. 

 

I dumped Ford over such stupidity about 50 years ago. There are plenty of fish in that sea. 

 

 

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Is adding a factory part that was deleted from the exact same assembly really a modification? 😏 Okay, let's say they win that one. Here's my personal warranty to guarantee.

 

You don't stand behind what you sold I guarantee you don't sell to me again. How's that for a warranty? 

 

Now people will argue that my refusal will have no impact on GM. Ask Mc Donnal's how that strategy is working out for them? It's called an 'Economic Vote". One wins nothing. Keep screwing people long enough and those votes start eating your lunch. Micky D's is in the process of walking that attitude back. 

 

I dumped Ford over such stupidity about 50 years ago. There are plenty of fish in that sea. 

 

 

GM lost me with cars after the rear drive Impala was discontinued. Genesis filled that gap. New trucks got too expensive, adding cylinder deactivation was the icing. As long as there’s choices people don’t have settle. The transmission dipstick thing doesn’t bother me as much because it’s a more accurate check. There’s really no reason to check the transmission fluid unless there’s a leak. So checking during oil changes is sufficient. I can understand why people would get upset over it. I don’t think it was a cost saving change. I think it was an efficiency change. 

Jettech1 Senior Enthusiast

Jettech1

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hang on all, I'm thinking I caused a bad thing here.  This topic was brought up to me from another forum that confused me quite a bit.  I get what everyone is saying here and I agree with most all.  I swear I was not trying to turn this into something that it is right now.  We all have a lot of questions at times.  The answers are there whether we want to believe them or not.

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted

There are a lot of things that can be done. Some have a cost. I don't mind paying that cost. Cheat me and I dump you, forever. Pretty simple. 

 

Look, they have this where they want it. Do anything I don't say is okay, and it's a foul, I won't fix your vehicle? But do as I say and what I tell you to do, well, it will shorten it's life by the amount that benefits me most? They think they have me by the short hair. What they have is failed relationship. Mary has balls. Just not mine. 

 

They lost me with the 6L80E torque converter issue. A known problem they would not fix and continued to propagate. One that decimated the transmission when it fails, and it will fail. That isn't planned obsolescence. That is grand theft done legally. They dare me to move on. Okay.....

 

I'll give my money to Mitsubishi or Kia. 

  • Like 2
Pryme Senior Enthusiast

Pryme

Posted
Posted

Really any mod anyone does to their vehicle can be scrutinized just as Newdude explained for this mod. 
 

catch cans, exhaust, different lighting installs etc. heck, even a more powerful amplifier taxing the trucks electrical system. All the same. 

  • Like 1
diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

I believe it was mentioned that warranty work is at the discretion of the dealer. That may lead to the decision makers frame of mind at that time. Is this person hung over, had a fight with the spouse ETC. 

Same scenario with anyone in a position of authority, why I have a problem with these people. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted

The other thing a guy can do beside live in fear is do what needs to be done. If I owned a V8 six speed it would have a billet converter pronto and if they deny a transmission claim for a transmission that did not fail.... jokes on them. It is EXACTLY what I do, and I suffered zero issues and spent less than $20 in broken or damaged parts for the 'lifetime' of the truck. That isn't 'luck of the draw". 

 

This dipstick thing isn't about 'better' for you. It's about better for them. Force more people who could do some work at home for the cost of the fluid into a shop where it is done for hundreds beyond the price of fluid. It isn't about you getting the fluid level wrong. If you have enough skill to install it, then I'm sure you can manage getting the level right. I could do this task by the time I was eight years old and I'm not that special. 

 

Now, if you can't tell a spark plug from a fire plug, then by all means let the dealer milk that cow for all it's worth. 

 

This, "I don't want any problems" followed by "I don't want to do anything about it either" is getting old. Fix known issues, change your oil and quite whining about what may happen if you don't do something. Something will. Then we get to do this again. It won't make you feel better. And it won't solve the problem. :idiot:  

 

:rant:

 

  • Like 1
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

The other thing a guy can do beside live in fear is do what needs to be done. If I owned a V8 six speed it would have a billet converter pronto and if they deny a transmission claim for a transmission that did not fail.... jokes on them. It is EXACTLY what I do, and I suffered zero issues and spent less than $20 in broken or damaged parts for the 'lifetime' of the truck. That isn't 'luck of the draw". 

 

This dipstick thing isn't about 'better' for you. It's about better for them. Force more people who could do some work at home for the cost of the fluid into a shop where it is done for hundreds beyond the price of fluid. It isn't about you getting the fluid level wrong. If you have enough skill to install it, then I'm sure you can manage getting the level right. I could do this task by the time I was eight years old and I'm not that special. 

 

Now, if you can't tell a spark plug from a fire plug, then by all means let the dealer milk that cow for all it's worth. 

 

This, "I don't want any problems" followed by "I don't want to do anything about it either" is getting old. Fix known issues, change your oil and quite whining about what may happen if you don't do something. Something will. Then we get to do this again. It won't make you feel better. And it won't solve the problem. :idiot:  

 

:rant:

 

I modified 99 percent of the vehicles I’ve owned. I never gave warranty a thought. I had two warranty claims. Both vehicles had tunes and exhaust work. Neither caused the problem. They were fixed no charge. I don’t know what it cost for a transmission rebuild in your area. But I bet changing a converter for preventative maintenance would rival that cost. Unless you did it yourself. I would get extended warranty. And maybe do the change afterwards. Maybe l don’t understand your point. It wouldn’t be the first time. 🤓

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I modified 99 percent of the vehicles I’ve owned. I never gave warranty a thought. I had two warranty claims. Both vehicles had tunes and exhaust work. Neither caused the problem. They were fixed no charge. I don’t know what it cost for a transmission rebuild in your area. But I bet changing a converter for preventative maintenance would rival that cost. Unless you did it yourself. I would get extended warranty. And maybe do the change afterwards. Maybe l don’t understand your point. It wouldn’t be the first time. 🤓

The R&R is the same. The price difference between a Reman transmission and a converter is HUGE.

Will a stock converter go 60K? Probably. Then the cost is on you.... all of it.  

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Pryme Senior Enthusiast

Pryme

Posted
Posted

One other thing I thought I’d mention. For the guys who don’t believe you have to check the transmission fluid as long as there’s no leak…..

 

plenty of guys are not leaking oil but are using plenty. Transmission fluid can burn off too. 
 

Heck, I drive my truck 5-6k a year. So in 5 years when my transmission warranty is over, my truck will probably have a whopping 25-30k miles. I’d hope I don’t have transmission issues before that especially being my truck has thus far led a very cushy life. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, Pryme said:

One other thing I thought I’d mention. For the guys who don’t believe you have to check the transmission fluid as long as there’s no leak…..

 

plenty of guys are not leaking oil but are using plenty. Transmission fluid can burn off too. 
 

Heck, I drive my truck 5-6k a year. So in 5 years when my transmission warranty is over, my truck will probably have a whopping 25-30k miles. I’d hope I don’t have transmission issues before that especially being my truck has thus far led a very cushy life. 

My experience pulling heavy 25k combination driving 50K miles a year. I never had to add transportation fluid. I used 1 ton dodge, Chevy and ford diesel and gas. Maybe it was the Amsoil. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Another JR
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By Another JR · Posted

      Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • newdude
      Gas fill door

      By newdude · Posted

      Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • newdude
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By newdude · Posted

      No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...