Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

IMG_3834.thumb.jpeg.aefea2253b49bf4ee1d654c23b1223b7.jpegSo I love my 2020 Denali and that it came from the factory with the Brembo performance brake option. 36,000 miles later, I still love my truck, but not too fond of the brakes. 
Early on, they started to pulse and they resurfaced the rotors and it was fine.

Today with 36k miles, the pads are toast and, since they were resurfaced once, need to replace the rotors too.

GM is the only place you can get replacements -no  manufacturer of any type, has replacements.

So even with a discount on the GM parts, Flow Performance, I’m looking at about $1,200.00 delivered. 
OK, done venting, still love my truck -just gotta do a brake job this weekend.

 

Edited by Glava2876
  • Like 1
Posted

I get it. Sucks they didn't last at least 50,000 miles.

You know what they say....

If you want to run with the big dogs you can't piss with the puppies 😁

  • Haha 2
Posted

So I did the brake job -it was actually hard to find the rotors and pads. Finally gave my vin to Flow and they hooked me up. 
I don’t tow or haul large loads and was amazed that the pad on one side was down to metal and the other side was just a thin film.

The funny part is that I never heard any wear sensor and because you lose the thickness monitor with the change to Brembo pads, I had no warning -the brakes actually felt fine and the only way I found out is that the truck failed NYS inspection. 😂

Posted

It must be disheartening to have the performance brakes fail probably earlier than the stock brakes would.

Posted

Softer grippy pads with the performance brakes would be the tradeoff IMO. Especially on a 5,000 lb. truck. 

Hopefully an aftermarket solution with more robust pads will materialize.

Posted (edited)

I’ve only had one other vehicle eat brakes and rotors this quickly -my 2015  Sierra 1500 with standard brakes did the same at 45k miles.

When I checked on what to expect from Brembo brakes -they say 35-40k.

I checked all of the manufacturers of brakes and none of them listed the performance brake option size, which is over 16”-even called Powerstop which is what I put on  my Z06 to get rid of the Brembo brake dust.

Like I said, I really love my truck and will have to live with the brakes😂

Edited by Glava2876
Posted

There was another thread on here around hard to find parts for replacement on these. DenaliSS actually came back and posted the part numbers on the post he started. Is that not valid anymore?

I don't have these brakes, however I was considering them. Wondering if I should reconsider.

If you had the choice, stick with them or something like Wildwood or Powerstop? 

Posted

Luckily I have part number now on my receipt 😂 They look and work great. Not sure what kind of mileage you would get out of Powerstop or others, but there would be more pad options.

Posted
46 minutes ago, Glava2876 said:

Luckily I have part number now on my receipt 😂 They look and work great. Not sure what kind of mileage you would get out of Powerstop or others, but there would be more pad options.

 

23 hours ago, Glava2876 said:

I’ve only had one other vehicle eat brakes and rotors this quickly -my 2015  Sierra 1500 with standard brakes did the same at 45k miles.

 

178,000 on my 2015's original set of brakes with over 50% left on the pads. I let off the gas well before the stop sign. I don't try to stick the landing on the stripe. 😬 

 

My ex used to go through brakes like this. She wore heels and was resting her toe on the brake. 😏

 

I learned early that my wallet and my right foot have a direct link. 😉 

Posted
6 hours ago, Glava2876 said:

Luckily I have part number now on my receipt 😂 They look and work great. Not sure what kind of mileage you would get out of Powerstop or others, but there would be more pad options.

My truck is not my daily driver. I only have 5300 miles on it currently, and the sensors say I'm still at 98%, so that wasn't my concern really. I was asking from the standpoint of if they were worth the cost, do you notice any real difference compared to past vehicles without them. That kind of thing. 

Doing some more digging on Wildwood, they suffer the same issue as likely any big brake kit in that they don't allow the continued use of the brake sensor, which I kind of like. Powerstop on the other hand looks like it retains that functionality, but isn't a big brake kit. Wondering if you gain any noticeable difference with it though.

Posted
5 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

I learned early that my wallet and my right foot have a direct link. 😉 

That is so true! 😂

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

The big brakes definitely have a little more stopping power than my 2015 that was basically the same Denali with the 6.2 also -that one was used for mostly highway, but the brakes and rotors were shot at 50k miles. The worst thing, for both trucks, was how severely rusted the rotors were. Maybe the upstate ny salt on the thruway and Route 81 was real intense -I believe that they started using a liquid brine like crap. 
So, the my take away is that I gained some improvement in braking and look awesome -but probably would not option them on my next truck. 
Also, I wash my truck all the time, so the salt never stayed on my truck for more than a day or two at most -if they don’t salt where you live, you’ll probably get more mileage out of the brakes.

 

 

 

Edited by Glava2876
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,724
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    No1UKnow
    Newest Member
    No1UKnow
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,150 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My take: I don't think seeing up to 200k on the odometer of any of these engines/trucks (2014-to present) is surprising. (Excluding the known DEFECTS, specifically, the 6.2 main/connecting rod bearing issues, the defective lifters, alternatively parts that a recall was issued for - I think there were three.)   250K is my line in the sand, anything over that is 'surprising', but not limited to the engine making it that far but including the truck surrounding it too. (We've talked about this in other posts, why I think the engine isn't the deciding factor for ultimate mileage.)
    • I included the first gen-cylinder de-activation (active fuel management) in my statement.
    • Hello All!   My 2019 Colorado 3.6 LT, 4WD Crew Cab has approximately 77,500 miles and I recently began experiencing the well-known transmission shudder between about 30 and 65 mph. The problem had worsened to the point that I could no longer attribute it to road conditions - and I had decided to bring the truck to the dealer - when recently, I experienced a sudden loss of power while driving at maybe 40 MPH. Several warning lights flashed, the “Check Stabilitrack” message appeared, and the Check Engine, Stabilitrack, and Traction Control icons remained illuminated. The truck regained driving power, but it stayed in a low gear with unusually high RPMs for the speed. (limp mode?) Because I was only about two miles from home, driving slowly, I was able to make it back and run an OBD-II scan, which showed fault codes U0101, P0700, and U0100. My next trip in the truck was to drive it to the dealer the following day. That trip began normally, but after about a mile I experienced another loss of power, along with the same warning lights and the same “Check Stabilitrack” message. As before the truck remained driveable, but again operated at an abnormally high RPM-to-speed ratio and seemed stuck in a single gear. About a mile later, the dashboard lit up once more, this time displaying “Check 4WD.” Soon after that, I arrived at the dealer. I have verified that the truck still has its original factory transmission fluid, which means it has never received the corrective fluid exchange outlined in GM Technical Service Bulletin #18-NA-355.  That was Thursday of last week and I've heard nothing yet from the dealer.    According to Technical Service Bulletin #18-NA-355 and the build date of my truck, my truck should have the newer LV fluid. I've done a little research and read something about a problem with the wiring harness as well.   Anyone have an insights into this situation?  Thank you!!
    • Having bumper and other body damages can be very frustrating, especially as a result of a parking lot collision/bump. Our team wants to learn more about the damages to your truck so we can look into ways we might be able to help. When you get the chance, please fill out our support form with more details: https://s.gmc.com/support-request . A member of our team will follow up with you as soon as next available. We want to get you enjoying your truck to the fullest again. 
    • Did you even read this article?   Even the title of the article says "U.S.-Iran Deal Doesn’t Mean a Swift Return of Oil and Gas Flows"   Remember, crude oil prices are based on FUTURE purchases by the oil companies.  Gas prices are based on FUTURE purchases by the station.  This article stated that many of the oil producing nations have to restart their processes to get the oil produced.  Then the oil has to be shipped to wherever.  And it doesn't get there overnight.  And most of that oil is not coming here. Check out this site:  https://afdc.energy.gov/data/10621   A graph will pop up to show where the US imports their oil from.  Notice that there isn't a lot of import from OPEC and Iraq.  Most of the US import comes from Canada. The US oil produces are selling their oil on the open market, which is why the US fuel costs went up.  So you're correct, the US oil companies are going to slow walk the price downward.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...