Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

PS when I picked up my truck originally it had like 6 or 10 miles on it but a large number of hours in comparison and I was already home so I did not think much about it.

I found out later that Chevy new that they had some crappy issues and were having dealers put large fans in front of the trucks and run em at a high idle for X amount of time to see of they acted up.

I will search for that information.

Thanks for any and all input.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 4/24/2024 at 3:48 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Are you saying that just recently it started this and for the first, say, 50,000 miles it was fine? 😉 

Last oil change it came up, but I was travelling alot and added oil and kept running her thinking WTF but did not check records until I was into this oil change only 2k miles and it came on again so for the first 40K it was good to go.

  • Like 3
Posted
On 4/24/2024 at 7:17 AM, Black02Silverado said:

My 2019 with 48k on it stays full.  When I got it brand new, I drove it like I did with any of my other vehicles. No break in, just got in and went.  The fact that the 6.2 has so much power, it was hard to keep it out of the redline. 🤣 

 

Anyway, I changed the factory oil out at 500 miles, installed AMSOIL's OE 0w-20 and went to 1,500 miles, again with the OE 0w-20 and then went to 3,000 miles. Then installed AMSOIL's Signature Series 0w-20 and now following my used oil analysis for changes.  Currently going 10k on a change.  No oil usage at all.

 

Now I do drive in manual mode and select L9.  Have been since I purchased the truck.  This keeps auto stop and DFM off.

 

I also run a bottle of AMSOIL's P.i. every 4k miles as well as mix E85 fuel in with regular.  I fill 10 gallons of E85 and then fill the rest of the way up with regular or premium.  Have been doing that as well for over 40k miles.  No issues.  I want to convert it to flex fuel but for now the cost isn't worth it. Hoping down the line that cost will go down. 

My 2020 has no E85 sensor so I run premium only either 91 or 92 depending on where I am at geographically.

I am using a Pulsar so no auto off and on or cylinder deactivation is occuring. Oil changes always at 30%ish with the 0-20 Dexos

I think the above poster with the fuel dilution idea may be onto something, but i am going to wait and see what the clowns at the circus come up with first.

I expect a jerk off session from the Dealer and or GM but I am prepared for the battle.

Truck is gorgeous, I have expelled the whole thing since it's first week and done exhaust and wheel and suspension upgrades to it blah blah so this sucks to have to deal with.

  • Like 2
Posted
50 minutes ago, johnnyquick said:

My 2020 has no E85 sensor so I run premium only either 91 or 92 depending on where I am at geographically.

I am using a Pulsar so no auto off and on or cylinder deactivation is occuring. Oil changes always at 30%ish with the 0-20 Dexos

I think the above poster with the fuel dilution idea may be onto something, but i am going to wait and see what the clowns at the circus come up with first.

I expect a jerk off session from the Dealer and or GM but I am prepared for the battle.

Truck is gorgeous, I have expelled the whole thing since it's first week and done exhaust and wheel and suspension upgrades to it blah blah so this sucks to have to deal with.

Stay after your dealer and don't let them beat you down.

 

Good luck.

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, johnnyquick said:

Last oil change it came up, but I was travelling alot and added oil and kept running her thinking WTF but did not check records until I was into this oil change only 2k miles and it came on again so for the first 40K it was good to go.

 

Pull an oil sample and have a GC fuel run on it plus 100 C viscosity. If vis is fine and fuel is low, then at these miles lacquered rings would be my next best bet. Rings don't just 'unseat'. They stick. But make sure it isn't viscosity break first. 

  • Like 2
  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 5/6/2024 at 9:30 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Pull an oil sample and have a GC fuel run on it plus 100 C viscosity. If vis is fine and fuel is low, then at these miles lacquered rings would be my next best bet. Rings don't just 'unseat'. They stick. But make sure it isn't viscosity break first. 

Where can I get the oil sample tested and how much will they need?

Posted

Ever wonder why GM calls for 5w30 in the LV3 and LV1, even today? Why 0w40 in the 6.2 Vette engine? That ought to tell you something.

Posted
5 hours ago, johnnyquick said:

Where can I get the oil sample tested and how much will they need?

 

See @Black02Silverado and ask for an Oil Analyzers sample kit.

Comes with instructions and he has everything you need. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted
15 hours ago, johnnyquick said:

Where can I get the oil sample tested and how much will they need?

I can get you an oil sample kit. PM me your information or txt 910-290-2371

  • Thanks 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...