Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Will be needing tires here soon and have the 22” Denali Ultimate wheels. Looking at the Michelin Defenders - anyone have experience with these? Would also be looking at an AT tires, but worry they’d take away from quiet ride. Any suggestions?

IMG_2284.png

Posted (edited)

I'll replace mine with Goodyear Fortera SL (if they still make them). I really liked them on my Ram Limited. 20200211_185754.thumb.jpg.db18c9bd9a6b62e27763df3bfe851b5f.jpg

Edited by Jus Cruisin
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

IMG_3834.thumb.jpeg.0529c4ce8ea2fd28923df97c7490fc50.jpegI have a 2020 Denali that came with the Bridgestone 22” tires, which were pretty shot by only 35k miles. Went with Michelin Defenders as the best AS option I could find. Have about 2,500 miles on them now and they are great. Much better wet traction and handling.

IMG_3833.jpeg

IMG_3835.jpeg

Edited by Glava2876
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, Glava2876 said:

IMG_3834.thumb.jpeg.0529c4ce8ea2fd28923df97c7490fc50.jpegI have a 2020 Denali that came with the Bridgestone 22” tires, which were pretty shot by only 35k miles. Went with Michelin Defenders as the best AS option I could find. Have about 2,500 miles on them now and they are great. Mush better wet traction and handling.

IMG_3833.jpeg

IMG_3835.jpeg

I’m in the same boat. I have 31k on my truck and the Alenzas are close to the wear bar!

Edited by Ultimate 2022
Posted

I went with the MIchelin Defenders right off the lot. I didn't want the Bridgestone Alenza that came on the truck as they aren't good in snow or icy conditions, the LTX2s are supposed to be much better in those conditions.

Posted

We live rural in the mountains of Colorado and our dirt roads aren't maintained well. Our AWD SUV has Defenders on it and love them. Some of the road conditions including snow and mud they have been great. A few times I was in doubt but they came through.

Posted

I would go with the Defenders or the Continental TerrainContact H/T. The Continentals are highly regarded by Tire Rack. Better in the wet according to their road tests. You can't go wrong with either.

Posted

I have had the Michelin Defenders on one of my other trucks and they are really good. However, if you have a Costco Membership, you can get the "Michelin - X LT A/S 2". This is by far the best tire I have ever owned for my trucks. Good wet traction and the last set lasted 80,000 miles. Only available at Costco.

CostcoMichelin.png

Posted (edited)
On 5/15/2024 at 11:04 AM, Ultimate 2022 said:

I’m in the same boat. I have 31k on my truck and the Alenzas are close to the wear bar!

I have 34,000+ miles on my 2021 with oem 22-inch Alenza's. I was looking at the new truck recently and the appraiser looked at the tires real close and said, very good tires.  Not even close to the wear bars. I think I seen where they are rated for 60,000 miles.  I realize the 22's are expensive ($1200-$1500 set of 4) tires to replace so I rotate every 7.500 miles.  But like brakes, tire wear is dependent on the driver.   On a side note, the local GY/BS/Michelin Dealer charges $50 per tire mounting and balancing (stick-on weights).  He charged me $25 to mount 1 ATV tire, took 5 min.  The minimal charge for any service.

Edited by elcamino
Posted
On 5/18/2024 at 10:23 PM, elcamino said:

I have 34,000+ miles on my 2021 with oem 22-inch Alenza's. I was looking at the new truck recently and the appraiser looked at the tires real close and said, very good tires.  Not even close to the wear bars. I think I seen where they are rated for 60,000 miles.  I realize the 22's are expensive ($1200-$1500 set of 4) tires to replace so I rotate every 7.500 miles.  But like brakes, tire wear is dependent on the driver.   On a side note, the local GY/BS/Michelin Dealer charges $50 per tire mounting and balancing (stick-on weights).  He charged me $25 to mount 1 ATV tire, took 5 min.  The minimal charge for any service.

I rotate every 7500 miles, don't tow, and definitely dont race the truck, so im not sure. I wish they had a warranty, cause no way will they get to 60,000.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,964 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...