Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 3/28/2025 at 1:44 PM, just fun said:

I had a Ram ecodiesel and would get 15,000Km to a tank of DEF - what's up with the 3.0L getting like 6,500km???

 

 

Emissions requirements increased DEF usage over the past few years.

 

Also, here's a couple good reads from GM on DEF consumption rate below.  The second one has some good details on it indicating low but still has DEF in it:

 

Diesel Exhaust Fluid Consumption – TechLink

 

Unable to Fill the DEF Tank – TechLink

Edited by newdude
Posted

What size was the tank on the ram ecodiesel?

 

6500km (4000 mi) is less than the range I'm getting -- but DEF usage is a ratio to fuel usage, so depends on the fuel economy.

Posted (edited)

5,000 miles in 7-months and I only used 2 gallons of DEF. No towing, just normal everyday driving. Mostly 2-lane blacktop so 60 mph is tops.  Fuel quality a factor?   So far the only fuel I have used is Murphy (Walmart).  I do use a fuel additive with every tank, injector cleaner, cetane boost and cold flow improver all in one. 

Edited by Z45
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I just had an issue while towing that the DEF said empty when it was in fact full. I was getting speed limiting errors and called the dealer. It is a known issue with a bulletin that they are working on. Kinda freaked me out as this is my first diesel and I only have 2K miles on it.

Edited by d20todd
spelling
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 3/28/2025 at 1:44 PM, just fun said:

I had a Ram ecodiesel and would get 15,000Km to a tank of DEF - what's up with the 3.0L getting like 6,500km???

I still have my 2018 ecodiesel, I'm sure you're aware of the GDE Tune for the Ram, there's also one for the babymax from GDE fyi!!  I'm sure they improved the DEF usage

 

https://greendieselengineering.com/product/gm-1500-lz0-duramax-engine-tune/

 

global b costs a fortune!!  Ecodiesel was $1,000.  $2K for the babymax because of that global b unlocking and gm tracks the flashes lol, i'm from the government, i'm here to help!

Edited by Snow White
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Added 5 gallons at around 6K km and just got the 1000km warning today at around 12K km - crazy how much it uses - gonna have to get a 6 pack on standby!!! Good thing its gets good fuel mileage at least......

Posted (edited)
On 4/19/2025 at 3:48 PM, d20todd said:

I just had an issue while towing that the DEF said empty when it was in fact full. I was getting speed limiting errors and called the dealer. It is a known issue with a bulletin that they are working on. Kinda freaked me out as this is my first diesel and I only have 2K miles on it.

 

 

Its how it works.  No fixes for it other than do drive it until you actually see a countdown for low DEF range.  

 

Diesel Exhaust Fluid Consumption – TechLink

 

Unable to Fill the DEF Tank – TechLink

Edited by newdude
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, just fun said:

Added 5 gallons at around 6K km and just got the 1000km warning today at around 12K km - crazy how much it uses - gonna have to get a 6 pack on standby!!! Good thing its gets good fuel mileage at least......

 

Def usage should be about 2% of fuel usage.

Did you track your fuel consumption during that period?   If so, what avg mileage is it getting? 

 

And are you running a 6.6 or a 3.0 (or even a 2.8)?

(it would be good to add truck info to avatar and/or signature...)

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by redwngr
Posted

I just came to say the same thing about a lot of DEF usage on a 3.0 - 10,000km and have added 5 gallons after the full tank when purchased and below half already - at 10L/100km I should be at 20L DEF  used by that calc but am more like 30-35?  I also had a RAM eco and saw 12K-13K before needing to put any in?

Posted
4 hours ago, TJL72 said:

I just came to say the same thing about a lot of DEF usage on a 3.0 - 10,000km and have added 5 gallons after the full tank when purchased and below half already - at 10L/100km I should be at 20L DEF  used by that calc but am more like 30-35?  I also had a RAM eco and saw 12K-13K before needing to put any in?

What fuel mileage is the truck giving?

Posted
2 hours ago, redwngr said:

What fuel mileage is the truck giving?

10-11 L/100KM or 25-22 MPG. Gets to 9L or 26 MPG on longer runs w no traffic but thats not driving easy.

Posted
On 3/28/2025 at 1:34 PM, redwngr said:

What size was the tank on the ram ecodiesel?

 

6500km (4000 mi) is less than the range I'm getting -- but DEF usage is a ratio to fuel usage, so depends on the fuel economy.

The RAM Ecodiesel DEF tank capacity is 8 gallons.  I could go almost a year without filling it on my '17 ECO; GDE tune and 3-4000 miles towing a 5500lb boat, doing about 12-15k miles/year.

My '22 1500 LM2 gets maybe 3600-4800 miles between DEF fills.  The tank capacity is 5.3 gallons which explains part of the fill frequency difference between the LM2 and the Ecodiesel.   

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Still seem to be higher than most ....am at 19,000km, used full from new tank, plus 4 boxes and have low warning again. That is approx 15gal/60L of DEF so far???? at 2% of fuel should be 40L I think???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...