Jump to content

Truck Sold = Parts Sale!

DenaliStone

By DenaliStone
in Classifieds (Buy/Sell/Trade)

 Share

Recommended Posts

DenaliStone Enthusiast

DenaliStone

Posted
Posted (edited)

I joined the others that dumped their truck due to the 6.2l recall, so I've got some parts for that truck to sell. These are all brand new unless otherwise specified.

 

Digital Rear View Mirror camera relocation kit when installing a camper shell on your truck. Fits 2019-2025 GM trucks with the digital rear view mirror. Information at this link. I'll take $250 shipped. 

IMG_0908Large.thumb.jpeg.d0dfd25ff4f340c07d6cb73433980964.jpegIMG_0901Large.thumb.jpeg.6edfb1911e29eb969b54ea0e68550963.jpegIMG_0898Large.thumb.jpeg.1ffe03b5a40b6d9d7f5ddc510024ae32.jpegIMG_0900Large.thumb.jpeg.480b97986b7c73093dec431b442920f3.jpegIMG_0899Large.thumb.jpeg.c738f414845c5a159c3a14a2d9fc5a6b.jpeg

 

 

Camper Shell Installation harness from TAG Accessory Group. I never got around to putting this on my truck after getting the shell. Here is a link for more info. I'll take $75 shipped.

IMG_0904Large.thumb.jpeg.07362fdd523c49494c7ddacbe6860474.jpegIMG_0905Large.thumb.jpeg.8c8bb48e3ee30fd1ad612e9a4e387f38.jpeg

 

 

Maxtrac Lowering Shackles for trucks with adaptive ride control. Here is a link to info. I'll take $60 plus shipping. 

IMG_0902Large.thumb.jpeg.e81c344a1d2a20201e6517590a7035ec.jpegIMG_0903Large.thumb.jpeg.09fa979d37bb6758c21840619f877aba.jpeg

 

 

Fittings to add an ethanol sensor to fuel line. I ended up finding other factory fittings to put it in a different spot so I didn't have to cut the fuel line. I don't remember anything about them as I bought it all about 5 years ago when I was modding my 2016 Denali. $20 shipped.

IMG_0936Large.thumb.jpeg.38abdeb16c3b585b2dcc779500a3c08b.jpegIMG_0937Large.thumb.jpeg.5969dd1dd815d46f6446ad1592cf8a04.jpegIMG_0938Large.thumb.jpeg.5d427fd819c0b39a398260c228cedceb.jpeg

 

 

Bed entry assist handle. "Used" as it came with the truck from the factory. I removed it at 25k miles when I installed my bedslide. I forgot to put it back on the truck when I traded it in. Here is a link for info. I'll take $100 plus shipping.

IMG_0932Large.thumb.jpeg.92a27754ca68673a0d9ea2c32536da1c.jpegIMG_0931Large.thumb.jpeg.12e6a9cdca26d8b9c5ab3bc7de4e8c78.jpeg

Edited by DenaliStone
Corrected photo order.
DenaliStone Enthusiast

DenaliStone

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 9/19/2025 at 4:45 PM, Black02Silverado said:

You converted your 2023 Sierra to FF?

No, I converted my 2016 to FF.

DenaliStone Enthusiast

DenaliStone

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Forgot to mention I'm open to offers as well. You can look me up on ebay with username mmstone24 to see my feedback as well. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Jake87
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jake87 · Posted

      I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • Jake87
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jake87 · Posted

      AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • NDKoze
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By NDKoze · Posted

      If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...