Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

 

 

Ole Reliable

 

IMG_0261.thumb.JPG.861d232b07a07caaddbdb9994727fc7f.JPG

 

She's 16 years old and our primary trip vehicle to ANYWHERE. Took her this spring to Denver. 2,000 miles round trip. 30 mpg on that trip. Zero oil usage. Flawless operation and comfortable beyond compare. She still looks new. I expect an additional 16 years from her in this shape. If I live that long. 😬

 

InkedIMG_0179_LI.thumb.jpg.622448e1144a9012c6e7a1268df0e02c.jpg

 

192,000 and anywhere, anytime. 10 years old. 19 mpg on E-85, 28 on gasoline. Original brakes with years left  on them. Uses no oil. Looks new, runs new. Quite as a mouse. 

 

I run things until the "Pick and Save" gives me a check somewhere over 200K, a few over 300K, or someone makes me an offer I can't refuse. I've owned fewer new cars that one has fingers on one hand and not many more than that used. I've traded exactly one to a dealer for a new one. 

 

Reliability isn't about years or miles. It's about care and condition.

And that...you have a say in. 

 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted

Tell me True

 

Anyone else have a personal ride (non-fleet) a decade or more old and/or 200K plus miles that you still have full confidence in? Something you would or do drive cross country without a serious concern. 

 

Photo? It story? 

Posted

Yep. Have had all my past vehicles trusted and old. 
 

Still have my 2000, 1500 I bought in 9 of ‘99. Drive and trust more than my ‘25 1500. 
 

 

IMG_3584.jpeg

IMG_3577.jpeg

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I’m really not too afraid of this thing either. 1971 Pontiac LeMans I bought in 1985. It WILL drink gas though as it’s around 630 hp and 610 tq with a 3 speed trans. 
 

 

IMG_2181.jpeg

IMG_1909.jpeg

IMG_1908.jpeg

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Posted

All have been used as trip vehicles. All reliable. All but the Acura are over 150K miles. Seems we’re favoring the Honda Van for trips now. The Acura once was enough. We’re too old, ouch. There’s more but family members use those. And I’m always looking. 

IMG_0778.png

IMG_0944.jpeg

IMG_0943.jpeg

IMG_0809.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

All have been used as trip vehicles. All reliable. All but the Acura are over 150K miles. Seems we’re favoring the Honda Van for trips now. The Acura once was enough. We’re too old, ouch. There’s more but family members use those. And I’m always looking. 

IMG_0778.png

IMG_0944.jpeg

IMG_0943.jpeg

IMG_0809.jpeg

I might`a thought you needed a dealer license. But then I thought, he ain`t sellin`.🙂

Posted
1 minute ago, PunchT37 said:

I might`a thought you needed a dealer license. But then I thought, he ain`t sellin`.🙂

The Acura my wife bought new as a toy. The Genesis was CPO with 1K miles. She says she ain’t selling ever. It barely leaves town. The Van I helped my daughter buy new I probably paid for 3/4s of. I traded her a low mileage CRV for it. The Ridgeline was a recent purchase. I let my grandson use the avalanche. I got to have a truck around. My favorite is the Genesis. I’m only allowed to drive it Sunday to church to put gas in. My least favorite is the Ridgeline. It’s a fine vehicle. Sometimes they just don’t fit. The biggest surprise is the minivan. You have to drive one for awhile to get it. About a dealer license. Way back when I lived in New Jersey I was turning over so many vehicles I got a notice from the DMV. That if I kept the pace up I would have to get a used vehicle dealership license. Working for my father one year we had lots of rain outs. Living near Fort Dix there were plenty of used cars lots. Every time it rained I’d come home with a different car. Every lettered or numbered car made I’ve had at least one example. Some were nice, some not so much. I slowed down only because I eventually needed a truck for work. And my wife would get attached to a car and put her foot down. When the kids got older. I’d have a toy and she would. I favored the larger performance cars she liked the small ones. The Acura was her last one. When she came home with the Genesis I was shocked. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, PunchT37 said:

Yep. Have had all my past vehicles trusted and old. 
 

Still have my 2000, 1500 I bought in 9 of ‘99. Drive and trust more than my ‘25 1500. 
 

 

IMG_3584.jpeg

IMG_3577.jpeg

Is that actual miles? Damn, you want a Ridgeline?😁

Posted
26 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

Is that actual miles? Damn, you want a Ridgeline?😁

Ain’t been driving much in the last few years. Shift worker with tons of overtime. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, PunchT37 said:

Ain’t been driving much in the last few years. Shift worker with tons of overtime. 

That’s within my favorite years up to cylinder deactivation. My Avalanche will never leave the family. I bet you feel the same with your gem. The Ridgeline will probably end up with a family member. Dibs have been called.

Posted
1 minute ago, KARNUT said:

That’s within my favorite years up to cylinder deactivation. My Avalanche will never leave the family. I bet you feel the same with your gem. The Ridgeline will probably end up with a family member. Dibs have been called.

I wasn’t about to trade that thing. I’ve seen plenty with over 300k on em. 
 

Good ole LM7 with 4L60E. 
 

Used to work at the chevy dealer when the 800’s were current.
 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, PunchT37 said:

I’m really not too afraid of this thing either. 1971 Pontiac LeMans I bought in 1985. It WILL drink gas though as it’s around 630 hp and 610 tq with a 3 speed trans. 
 

 

IMG_2181.jpeg

IMG_1909.jpeg

IMG_1908.jpeg

Love the smell of fuel and a 4 barrel!

  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, txab said:

Love the smell of fuel and a 4 barrel!

How bout the sound of it coming towards you at wide open throttle? About 6400 rpm`s on that engine.

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...