Jump to content

Ole Reliable

Grumpy Bear

By Grumpy Bear
in The Off-Topic Bar

 Share

Recommended Posts

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Atlas said:

 

A lot of people think that... But the Chevy SS / Pontiac G8 are not the same car as the Caprice pictured above. The Caprice was bigger. Also from our old Holden friends down in Australia.

 

I do like the SS / G8 though. Can't believe what they're still selling for, it's crazy.

 

 

Same platform, just longer wheelbase.  Both are the GM Zeta platform.  SS, G8 and Commodore VE and VF are SWB Zeta, Caprice (Holden and Chevrolet) and Buick Park Avenue were LWB Zeta. 

 

5th Generation Camaro was Zeta as well, and the only one actually produced in North America and was somewhat specific to Camaro.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

PunchT37
PunchT37

I’m really not too afraid of this thing either. 1971 Pontiac LeMans I bought in 1985. It WILL drink gas though as it’s around 630 hp and 610 tq with a 3 speed trans.     

OnTheReel
OnTheReel

What about owning multiples of the same vehicle & generation? Had FOUR 1986-1992 Toronados. This 92 was the last one I owned and the only one that I have a picture of since they pre-date the digit

newdude
newdude

Same platform, just longer wheelbase.  Both are the GM Zeta platform.  SS, G8 and Commodore VE and VF are SWB Zeta, Caprice (Holden and Chevrolet) and Buick Park Avenue were LWB Zeta.    5th

Posted Images

OnTheReel Senior Enthusiast

OnTheReel

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Atlas said:

 

Modern Camaros are my obsession...even I don't understand it! I've had too many to list. I love them all, the LT1's LS1's, V6's, the manuals, the automatics.... I'm also a huge third-gen fan too. I've always got my eyes peeled for low-mileage IROC-Z's.

I don’t care for them with the V6. Had a 95 Firebird 3.8 and 5 speed. Cheap impulse buy. Maybe kept it 3 months, it just didn’t speak to me. Too practical maybe.

 

I probably have the rose colored glasses on today because at the time even the 96 SS wasn’t really fast enough to scratch my itch. So yeah, the V6 version shouldn’t have ever been in my driveway.

3 hours ago, KARNUT said:

Rear drive big cars were my favorite. Especially from GM. 

Before my time to own one but my dad’s schtick was to buy full size GM cars with the junk diesel motors for peanuts and swap gassers into them. Did it with an early 80s LeSabre and an Olds 98. I remember them being very comfortable rides for sure.

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

I don’t care for them with the V6. Had a 95 Firebird 3.8 and 5 speed. Cheap impulse buy. Maybe kept it 3 months, it just didn’t speak to me. Too practical maybe.

 

I probably have the rose colored glasses on today because at the time even the 96 SS wasn’t really fast enough to scratch my itch. So yeah, the V6 version shouldn’t have ever been in my driveway.

Before my time to own one but my dad’s schtick was to buy full size GM cars with the junk diesel motors for peanuts and swap gassers into them. Did it with an early 80s LeSabre and an Olds 98. I remember them being very comfortable rides for sure.

We had 4 of those, nightmare. Two of them were converted. My thing was lmpalas. I had a few up to the 94. I went extreme on a 74 Impala custom. A 454, 700r4 transmission with a 373. It was my wife’s daily driver until she started working. Then my toy for a while. 14.2 in the quarter mile. Not bad for the 80s The I put the engine in a 76 Nova. Put the Impala back stock. I picked up a second with the Nova. 

Edited by KARNUT
  • Like 2
txab Senior Enthusiast

txab

Posted
Posted

Ahh the A6 AC compressor. Rock solid and they lasted well, in my experience. Still running one in my 45 year old 1/2 ton. Front seal is easy to replace. Still all R-12. I can hang meat in the cab.

 

I think I had a neighbor down the street that drove a Tempest

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

My 92 Chevy truck had the original compressor when I sold it 5 years ago. Just before I sold it I had the Freon converted. He had R-12 it was costly. The conversion was easy and worked well.

Atlas Senior Enthusiast

Atlas

Posted
Posted

I was aware of the Tempest but not the Trophy 4-cylinder (195 cubic inches/almost 3.2 liters!) or rear transmission.

 

Most of my experience with GM AC compressors are the R4's of the 80's and early 90's. WIth a good R12 charge they will freeze you out. Still very good with a proper 134a conversion (including the orifice tube). However, the newer compressors running 1234yf are no joke..

 

I've been considering adding a classic bordering antique to my collection. Collectors might consider my interest trite, but I think I'd like an earlier Advanced Design pickup 3100 or 3600. They're still fairly affordable if one intends to drive it occaisonally, say a few hundred to thousand miles per year, and parts are not yet impossible to find. I like the simplicity, 216 or 235 engine.

 

Speaking of "reliable" I recently learned about the 2025-2026 LZ0 "crankshaft end play" issues. Great. What I (still) hope to be a reliable engine in my new pickup is apparently plagued by catastrophic failure in some instances, under 10k miles. I was planning on taking it to Thanksgiving this year (about 1,000 mile trip), but now I'm thinking twice and maybe we'll take something else - hard to believe an EV is the next logical choice but here we are!

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
    • kickass audio
      Software Update

      By kickass audio · Posted

      when it's greyed out that is it's way of telling you that it's downloading the patch in the background. Eventually it will be fully downloaded and then it will prompt you at ignition shut down to run the update. I highly recommend doing the update once you get home and can run it a few times. I've had several issues with updates not going the first time around and I had to retry the update multiple times in my driveway before it was successful.   Some updates are huge and take awhile to download. You can help it by connecting to your home WiFi and keep the truck on service mode for the ignition and keep it alive for awhile on a battery charger too. There are specs it needs to be in for updating such as a full enough battery charge, no running ignition, etc.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...