Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 hours ago, AndrewF said:

The 6.6 gas has been one of the more reliable engines produced lately.  Interested to see what the dealership says but hopefully you're still under warranty so it'll get taken care of. 

And I'm under the impression it is not a reliable engine, the only engines with a worse track record are the AFM engines used in the 1500 series.  I've owned nothing except Chev/GMC trucks my entire adult life, but seriously leaning to Ford SD trucks with very reliable 6.8 & 7.3 SD engines along with a more dependable transmission. 

Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, MORSNO said:

And I'm under the impression it is not a reliable engine, the only engines with a worse track record are the AFM engines used in the 1500 series.  I've owned nothing except Chev/GMC trucks my entire adult life, but seriously leaning to Ford SD trucks with very reliable 6.8 & 7.3 SD engines along with a more dependable transmission. 

 

 

Godzilla eats cams but I guess you missed that part.

 

L8Ts that come in at work have been reliable.  We've only replaced one engine in a customer truck in the 6, going on 7 years its been out.  Maybe 2 or 3 came in for oil consumption monitoring.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 6
Posted
1 hour ago, MORSNO said:

And I'm under the impression it is not a reliable engine, the only engines with a worse track record are the AFM engines used in the 1500 series.  I've owned nothing except Chev/GMC trucks my entire adult life, but seriously leaning to Ford SD trucks with very reliable 6.8 & 7.3 SD engines along with a more dependable transmission. 

What gives you the impression it's not a reliable engine? Honest question.

  • Like 1
Posted
22 hours ago, BuckWallace said:

What gives you the impression it's not a reliable engine? Honest question.

 

Everywhere I go all I see is that a huge percentage of them use oil like its gasoline.  Adding a quart of oil every 1,000 miles is not acceptable for a quality engine. 

Posted
26 minutes ago, MORSNO said:

 

Everywhere I go all I see is that a huge percentage of them use oil like its gasoline.  Adding a quart of oil every 1,000 miles is not acceptable for a quality engine. 

 

 

So a few people on the internet out of the hundreds of thousands sold leads you to believe that.  Got it.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, MORSNO said:

 

Everywhere I go all I see is that a huge percentage of them use oil like its gasoline.  Adding a quart of oil every 1,000 miles is not acceptable for a quality engine. 

 

I can't claim that what you have seen said is entirely wrong as more engine platforms have gone over to lower tension rings and that has caused increased oil use as a result of that idea of reducing friction but the side effect of more oil slipping by the rings. However even on this forum there are those that have done a fair bit of towing with their trucks and not experienced high oil use along with some that have had higher than what has been considered normal oil consumption. Why the differences is a good question and I realize that the internet can drag out more of the bad then the good due to those that are not having an issue don't have reason to talk about something that is not a problem vs those that have a problem and are openly spreading around their frustration over an issue. 

 

All I can say so far with certainty from my short term experience with my own truck given that I have relatively few miles on it and have not been towing with it so far, is that its not been showing up to be an oil user under my low load use conditions. I was changing the oil very frequently for the first few oil changes because of wanting to do the best I could do flush out break in wear metals. The last oil I dumped out was from use this winter and was a 0W-30 and being used in our not so lovely Alberta winter temps and no doubt higher risk of more fuel dilution although by this spring with more moderate temps and my usual 100 mile plus round trips to town all along I can only speculate that most of any gas that may have found its way into the crank case would have gone through the pcv system. I estimated that perhaps the oil level had dropped around 1/16 of an inch in that 2500 miles and this was being parked in the exact spot each time I check the oil. 

 

A few weeks ago I had a brief conversation with a mechanic that has run his own one man shop for years and have had him do work over the years on a prior pickup and he works on various brands of pickups and so forth ( leaves the diesel end of things to others that have the specialized equipment for that ) and his brief comment to me about the 6.6 gas is that its been doing good overall BUT with the caveat that as long as one changes the oil often. Unfortunately he never had the time to elaborate beyond that as per what happens if its neglected but I know over the years he has worked on a lot of Ford half ton pickup engines replacing the timing chain and phasers and so on and that goes back to the 5.3 and the 5.0, 3.5 etc and the biggest determining factor often was how often the oil was changed or not as so many vehicles out there are going by factory minimum service intervals and its causing a lot of premature wear on some components. 

Posted
On 4/28/2026 at 2:28 PM, Chuck FB said:

 

Have you been doing your own oil changes and if so any particular oil filter brand you have been using. Also within that theme of oil changes was the oil changed just prior to this occurrence or a while back. 

 

I am purely speculating that something mechanical either let go due to a defect and a chain reaction such as a valve dropped after a valve spring broke etc or I suppose there is a possibility that a cam or crank bearing could have turned restricting oil flow and the oil pressure would remain good on the gauge but in reality starving parts of the engine from adequate oil. I guess that remains to be seen if the dealership does a tear down or if they find a mess and determine a new engine gets dropped in and the original engine gets whisked away without a proper look. 

No I don’t do my own oil changes and yes I’ve checked the oil level after each change regularly, dealer removed rollers and push rods today all look good on right bank, so going deeper tomorrow by removing head to get to lifters we will see what they find at that point!

IMG_2888.jpeg

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, James McArthur said:

No I don’t do my own oil changes and yes I’ve checked the oil level after each change regularly, dealer removed rollers and push rods today all look good on right bank, so going deeper tomorrow by removing head to get to lifters we will see what they find at that point!

IMG_2888.jpeg

It’s official: dealer just confirmed this evening,

I’m to receive a new long block! The number 1 rod bearing spun putting shavings in the oil.

New 6.6 engine will be ordered in the morning.

  • Like 2
Posted
7 hours ago, James McArthur said:

It’s official: dealer just confirmed this evening,

I’m to receive a new long block! The number 1 rod bearing spun putting shavings in the oil.

New 6.6 engine will be ordered in the morning.

That's honestly the first time I've heard of a 6.6 doing that. 

Posted

Same first time for me hearing this also.

Posted
On 4/28/2026 at 8:56 PM, No F-bdy Bs said:

Got a feeling someone is confusing the 6.2 for the 6.6.

Right or wrong dealership is awaiting approval for 6.6 to be replaced caused the 28,000 mile new engine spun #1 rod bearing and filled itself with metal, oh boy! Not feeling HD DNA at this point, anybody no how this will effect the resale value at some point.

  • Like 1
Posted

You never did share how frequently you had the oil changed in this engine? I am also curious if the air filter was ever changed or if you used an aftermarket intake?

  • Like 1
Posted

Make sure they replace the radiator and oil cooler lines also. The oil cooler in the radiator will be full of metal and there is no approved method to clean them. GM will bounce the claim if those are not replaced when the engine gets changed.

  • Like 1
Posted

As I believe I asked before, what the timeline was relative to the last time the engine oil was changed or any other maintenance that could have caused a foreign object to be introduced into the engine by way of the oil or the intake, including someone tampering with your truck. Also am wondering if by chance for example a small roller bearing came out of a roller lifter or one of the rockers and started a chain reaction of metal being able to get past the filter ( cold engine start filter bypassing for example ) and went through the crank bearings. I imagine it can be hard to tell after a bearing gets chewed up and sends metal around through the engine, the oil pump would have damage at that point so destroying any prior evidence. But it certainly could be a slight manufacturing mistake on the crank, the connecting rod or the rod bearing itself that eventually lead to it being spun in the con rod. I assume dealers don't spend too much time trying to sort out what could be hard to prove and if warranty covers the situation, a new engine and oil cooler system gets swapped in and life goes on. 

 

Like others I am curious what the oil change schedule was typically like and if there were a lot of idle hours on the engine or a lot of very short runs ( potential fuel dilution ) etc at times. 

 

I could be wrong in my thought but I rather doubt a complete/new engine replacement swap being done would affect future resale as long as the new engine is running well and perhaps some oil samples taken after its broken in to prove to you or a future buyer that its not showing any abnormal wear. The issue more so I think is when a particular vehicle platform gets a bad reputation rap like the 6.2 GM or way back with the GM gas block 5.7 diesel as buyers run the other way based purely on reputation and resale plummets as a result.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...