Jump to content

Are Larger Rims Overkill?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Before I go out and plop-down $600 to $800 on a set of new tires for my Tahoe I want to investigate the possibility of putting some nice rims on there. Right now I have the stock 17" Z71 rims. I always see guys driving around town with modified Tahoes or Escalades on pretty nice rims. However, I seriously begin to wonder if running around on those $600 (a piece) 22" rims running 305/35/22 rubber is the best thing in the world on handling, brakes, and real-world use.

 

What I mean by that is...if you add larger rims & tires then you are often adding more weight to the vehicle and thus affecting turning radius, suspension settings, and increasing the amount of with that the brakes have to do to stop those massive wheels. Plus I would imagine that those wheels would be destroyed pretty easily. Hmmm....

 

Am I completely off-base here with my assumptions? I guess that my angle on this is that I want to get some rims that are larger than the stock 17" wheels, that have a little bit of that "flashy" look, but I am a little afraid because I am not sure if popping a set of 20s or 22s on a Tahoe would somehow negatively affect its performance in the handling, turning, and braking department. I would imagine that putting tires on them would increase exponentially from $150 per tire to say $300 per tire.

 

Any suggestions or thoughts on this?

 

Regards,

John

Posted

The weight is nearly negligable, though it depends on what rims you get, some of the time weight will actually decrease with larger more expensive rims(depending on brand, size increase, etc). Also, handling improves with larger rim diameter, or rim to tire ratio.

 

With bigger tires 20 would be getting close to "too big" IMO. I for one, hate seeing large rims on trucks and SUVs. Seeing them on a Z71 would kill me. The vehicle is more or less designed for rough use, and with large rims you waste all that engineering for a strange sense of "style." That is a matter of opinion though...

 

Instead of neccessarily looking to go bigger, I would look into going slightly wider, or with a different design. Look at some of the Micky Thompson truck and off road wheels.

 

Mike

Posted

I have rode in a truck with 22's and those "rubber bands" for tires and the ride was harsh. You don't realize just how much the sidewalls of your tires absorb bumps until you virtually remove that sidewall.

 

On a Z71 model, I would look at another 17 inch wheel that would shove the outside of the rim closer to the flares and run a 285 tire. That would look sweet on a "off road" badged rig.

Posted

I just put 20s on my wifes Denali for $1420 at Discount, 8.5X20 Boss 307 wheels and 285/50r20 Goodyear Forturas and just sold the stock Denali wheels with worn out tires for 400 leaving me a net cost of $1020!!! Looks and drives nice, don't go with less than a 50 series tire, my truck has Michelin 275/55r20s and that is probably the perfect setup and a better tire than I put on hers.

 

Dan

Posted

The one thing not answered here is about the braking. The single largest mistake made by "home customizers" is that they overlook the brakes. When you add more power, more weight, or larger rolling stock (wheeles and tires), you have to modify the brakes to handle the additional stopping needs.

Posted

On the plus side, if you go ahead and upgrade to 17" or 20" wheels, then when you get ready for these you won't have a problem, they only come in 17" and 20".

 

You might want to get the rims 14-16" wide though.

 

 

Photo from NTW website showing new 54" Swamper Bogger.

 

 

xxIM000770.jpg

Posted

Doesn't the outside diameter effect the breaks much more than the actual weight of the tire. I know more weight, more inertia, but I think with the overall weight of the truck that would be negligable when compared to the extra torque at the brake with bigger tires when the truck is coasting.

 

Mike

Posted
Doesn't the outside diameter effect the breaks much more than the actual weight of the tire. I know more weight, more inertia, but I think with the overall weight of the truck that would be negligable when compared to the extra torque at the brake with bigger tires when the truck is coasting.

 

Mike

 

 

 

The rotational weight is a much bigger impact than you would think. Rotational weight has a much higher effect than the over all weight of the vehicle. But of course there is way more total weight of the vehicle so that affects it more.

Posted

The first consideration I have is that you have a Z-71. If you are going to off road it you should stick to the 17's and make use of the extra sidewall. If not I still think you need to keep some sidewall. I only needed to go around the block in my wife's Trans Am on 18's to know you need some sidewall to save the ride. Even one inch can make a huge difference. I have 20's and am very happy.

 

The wheels will weigh more (you probably can get larger wheels that are lighter but they'll cost you BIG BUCKS). That will affect you in two ways. You will notice first that is takes longer to stop. Yes, they will weigh that much more. The good news here is that you probably wanted to upgrade your brakes anyway. Brake upgrades like Baer require at least 18" wheels. Now you have them. The extra weight will also affect your gas mileage. Mine went down almost 2mpg.

 

Unless you're lucky you will also need to recalibrate you speedometer. The new wheels/tires will not be the same diameter as stock. They may be close but you should recal anyway. Yes, I took this into consideration when my gas mileage changed. Again, you're in luck. Fixing your speedo is a PERFECT reason to get a programmer or a custom PCM.

 

Another consideration is appearance from the side. Not the wheels themselves, the clearance from the tire to the fender well. If you go too small on the tires it will look funky. You can get a leveling kit but now we're back to the fact you have a Z-71. That could be a factor.

 

I have Goodyear Forteras as well. Have had them 2.5 years and about 60K miles so far. Am very happy with them all around.

 

Just my opinion.

Good luck.

Posted

Sounds to me like you are well aware of potential risks. Why take them? Your truck was well engineered by professionals, I trust them. Handling is kind of give and take, if the tires wheel combo you choose has a shorter sidewall handling will be more crisp and precise, BUT the additional unsprung weight can negate those benefits. Plus the shorter sidewall absorbs much less minor road imperfections that the suspension can't and a taller sidewall will. I would expect more vibration and rattle type ride issues, it's not like the suspension will become more firm or boat like.

Posted

I would never install larger tires/wheels on my Z71. Those 17 inch 265s are actually quite large in diameter, and definitely larger than those installed on heavy duty trucks, including the Duramax versions. All GM heavy duty pickup trucks come from the factory with 16 inch wheels.

 

Keep in mind that about 20 years ago, 235 75 R15 tires were the norm on full size pickups and SUVs, including the 4X4 versions. In comparison, 265 70 R17 tires are huge. As others have posted, you need a lot of sidewall for off-road applications. Nissan Titan trucks come stock with 18 inch wheels. But when you order the off road package, you get 17 inch wheels with higher sidewall tires. Toyota does the same thing on their Tundra.

Posted
The weight is nearly negligable, though it depends on what rims you get, some of the time weight will actually decrease with larger more expensive rims(depending on brand, size increase, etc). Also, handling improves with larger rim diameter, or rim to tire ratio.

 

With bigger tires 20 would be getting close to "too big" IMO. I for one, hate seeing large rims on trucks and SUVs. Seeing them on a Z71 would kill me. The vehicle is more or less designed for rough use, and with large rims you waste all that engineering for a strange sense of "style." That is a matter of opinion though...

 

Instead of neccessarily looking to go bigger, I would look into going slightly wider, or with a different design. Look at some of the Micky Thompson truck and off road wheels.

 

Mike

 

 

 

Mike, I totally agree. IMO the "big" 20 and 22 inchers look "not right" on lifted trucks . I love those rims and 50 series tires on 2wd lowered vehicles though. And actually 20" are not bad on a truck that has 40+" tire size IMO.

 

Oh and of course I agree on taking a look at the MT wheels... :smash:

 

 

Jason

Posted

I have a set of 22" wheels on my 2WD Sierra, and am running 265/35/22's on it, and the ride quality isn't really that bad at all. Granted, it doesn't ride like stock, and the tires are around $210 a piece, which isn't much more than a high-quality tire for a 17-inch wheel. As for braking, I can certainly notice a difference. I plan to upgrade my system to the Baer brakes. So yea, they are big, heavy, expensive, and slow down the truck quite a bit, but the first time you go out and turn some heads, it's all worth it...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...