Jump to content

Oh God.....


Recommended Posts

Posted

Good, because that one shown on the link looks like the result from an orgy of a Chrysler 300, PT Cruiser, and a Honda Ridgeline.

Posted
GM has offered a hybrid truck since 2005, not really new news.

 

The first gen really wasn't promoted, kind of like Quadrasteer.

 

But the Big news this time around is the Two-Mode system. Supposedly the electric motor has the TQ to haul as well as assist the gas engine. Like a 6.0 would need help. :smoker:

Posted

The concept truck is what makes me sad...not the hybrid deal....hybrid is great, its a good option, to keep the tree huggers off GM's back.

Posted
The concept truck is what makes me sad...not the hybrid deal....hybrid is great, its a good option, to keep the tree huggers off GM's back.

To each his own...

 

I actually like the GMC XT concept. It is based off the Holden Ute Crewman. It features an upcoming direct injected 4.9L V8 that makes 326hp along with the hybrid technology.

 

This will take care of most of the truck needs of most people. The biggest drawback I see is the low tow rating, but at 3500# it is higher than most compact trucks. In Australia a 4WD version is available, but it isn't the same as the 4WD trucks we have in the States.

 

For every day driving, this would work great for me. It isn't enough to tow my impala, but that would give me an excuse to buy an older Duramax truck :thumbs:

Posted
Good, because that one shown on the link looks like the result from an orgy of a Chrysler 300, PT Cruiser, and a Honda Ridgeline.

Couldn't agree more......

Posted

on pickuptruck.com they talked about dropping a 4.5 duramax in the concept one,

 

oh just an fyi, look at the headlights looks like the silv classics from 04 to 06, looks like GM realized they screwed up. ha.

 

I saw the hybrid tahoe drive away pretty impressive on electric only, if they put that transmission up to the 4.5 duramax you're talking about 30 to 35 mpg and a lot of towing, if you use a really strong unibody (unfortunately) or a body on frame setup.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hey everyone, I recently had an issue with my 07 2500HD GMT900. My DRL’s stay on at all times. Right front turn and right mirror turn signal indicator stay on solid at all times. By “at all times” I mean the only way to make them go off is disconnecting the battery. I tore the headlight assemblies out, tried disconnecting the harnesses to eliminate bad wiring at the harness, I unplugged the headlight switch, no change and the mirror turn signal still stayed on. My first thoughts were : Bad bulb and/or socket somewhere, under hood fuse panel bad, bcm bad, tail light or trailer wiring problem, or some random short to power in the harness.  Possibly a bad ground but unlikely. I had a big clue in the fuse panel, it had a burnt smell. I started pulling every fuse that had to do with DRL or right turn/park lamp. Nothing made the right directional turn off but pulling the DRL2 fuse made the DRL’s go out.  After studying wiring diagrams, I found that both problems had that fuse panel in common, the bcm also controls both problems but knowing the fuse panel had a burnt smell I removed and disassembled the fuse panel and found a little corrosion on the printed circuit board.  I ordered a new fuse panel from Amazon for like $260. When it arrived I installed it, and put everything back together, the problem was fixed. I figured the fuse panel needed to be replaced anyway so that was a logical place to start. Hopefully this story helps someone in the future. Regretfully I didn’t scan for codes before I did everything.
    • That stinks. I’m sitting on the side of the road right now with the same issue. Never had an issue before taking it in for the ground strap recall. Now I’m outside of warranty and they’ll probably want $200 just to diagnose what they already “fixed”. 
    • I wonder kind of nuts and bolts they will come up with next? Jim
    • “It should be recognized, however, that there becomes a point where fuel economy oils do not make much economic sense for the end consumer—we talk about a fuel saving of ~€100 compared to a risk of €1000 Euros if the oil is too thin and causes increased engine wear rates. However, the benefit of these oils accrues to the car manufacturers. If their vehicles can save 1–2% fuel by using a special fuel economy lubricant, then that OEM can drastically reduce the amount of fines they need to pay.”   I liked this and the following paragraph as well but it’s really only touching the beginning of the benefits OEMs see from spec’ing these oils. After you factor in “out of warranty” service work and new car sales when these engines fail before their time, it’s a good racket for them. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you!
    • Too much voodoo and snake oil.   Time to go EV    😉
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...