Jump to content

2016 Vehicle Standards Mpg


Recommended Posts

Posted

Barack Obama- just plain dumb since2009.

 

Seriously tho, i think that this will happen and the cost of a new 1500 series truck will go up significantly. I read on Pickuptrucks.com that 8500lb gvwr and above trucks will be excluded from this mess, also 1/2 ton diesels wont likley be built. IMO, i wouldnt be suprised to see 1/2 tons discontinued if they get too expensive( who the hell's gonna pay 50k for a new base model GM hybrid truck???), leaving only 3/4 and 1 tons, which likley wont have to abide to the new standards.

 

Either way, this is doing nothin but screwin the whole mid-west. In my city we got 2 chrysler plants and a GM powertrain factory, in addition to tons of suppliers. back in '06 Hydramatic employed about 4000, the Jeep Complex had a little more and the Chrysler torq-converter plant had a couple thousand. Now Hydramatic is closed for the next 9 weeks, and both chry. plants closed the day they filed for bankrupcy, no one has said if or when they will re open. Im sure the suppliers arent doing much better. I dont nor have i ever worked for any of these companies, but it annoys the hell out of me to see the auto industry going under all while our "leader" dont have the guts to get up and do somthing about it. These new standards will come at a huge cost, not only of "about $1300" per vehicle, but of a large par tof the mid west's job base.

 

 

 

Either way, if i dont buy a new truck by '15 im gonna have my '99 c2500 for a long time.

 

edit: get ready comrades, its gonna be a long and rough ride right to the USSA

Posted

Might want to edit that first line of your post gm88.

 

Edit: That might be more acceptable to the Mods. :thumbs:

Posted
Might want to edit that first line of your post gm88.

 

 

Ur right Barack Obama- flushing middle America down the toilet since 2009

 

:thumbs:

Posted

You can bet the price increase will be more than $1300 per vehicle. Wonder what the repair and maintenance upkeep will be on these new vehicles? Guess we're giving up on Hydrogen?

Posted
Might want to edit that first line of your post gm88.

 

 

Ur right Barack Obama- flushing middle America down the toilet since 2009

 

:thumbs:

 

 

I just didn't want your whole post to be deleted or worse the thread locked. :)

Posted
You can bet the price increase will be more than $1300 per vehicle. Wonder what the repair and maintenance upkeep will be on these new vehicles? Guess we're giving up on Hydrogen?

 

 

yep, i bet by 2022, people will be thrilled to replace a 8-10k battery pack or electric motor, in their '16 AMC pickup truck :thumbs:

Posted

yep i think we can pull of a 30 mpg full size truck, hell were the country that put a man of the moon with 60's technology, but i do think it will be cost prohibitive to most people, like most government made vehicles. Anyone want a base model 1500 for the low low price of 49999? :thumbs:

Posted

Great...the vehicles will be lighter and smaller....and LESS SAFE>

 

Seriously if I wanted to drive around in a POS Fiesta or some other tin can, I would buy one. But I don't.

 

You know, I wish there was a add-on for a vehicle that allowed it to spew copious amounts of harmless black smoke out of the tail pipe. Just to piss the greenies and environazis off...

Posted

o btw, it prolly a good time to start stocking up on R134-A while its still $5 per can, from what i read their going to try to make air conditioning systems "less harmful to the environment". To me that equals R134A at $100 or completly unavalible can some time in the near future as it "causes global warming".

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I'm the original poster of this thread; I'm 85,000 miles now with no transmission issues after they did the fluid change without filter at 45,000.  I plan on a fluid change AND filter in another 5,000 miles and agree with you on staying to witness what happens if possible.  Ideally I would have done the filter at 45,000 too, but my original dealer was incompetent.  I've since moved on and get service done by another more reputable dealer, so I'm hopeful they follow the correct procedure at 90,000.  
    • Sure, but they do have some affordable options like the Trax, Trailblazer, Envista, and Encore. Some of these have a cheaper base price than the Civic, though the fuel economy isn’t as high. The main problem is that people WANT the highest trim with all the goodies and finance for like 7 years. That’s how ppl “afford” the more expensive vehicles. 
    • Holy s**t - not much of a parts thrower you say? You BLASTED that thing with the parts cannon!  You'd have been probably $1,000 ahead if you had just brought it to a competent shop rather than shotgunning a bunch of parts it clearly didn't need.   Just FYI - oil additives are really, REALLY good at ONE thing ... and that's emptying your wallet. They're ALL useless gimmicks.   If that has the L94 or L99, then #7 is an AFM cylinder. I'd suspect a failed lifter in that case.   If you leaned on wiring, sensors, and/or connectors while changing the oil, you'll have to check all that to be sure pins didn't get pulled out, connectors broken, etc.. Old wire loom that was barely adequate when new is certainly brittle by year 19 - make sure wires aren't chaffed and shorting out somewhere where you might have leaned. or supported yourself on it.   If your a mechanic, why didn't you just find out what you were missing and troubleshoot from there??  TIMED spark, fuel PSI / injector pulse, air, compression.  Can't make ANY money going the parts cannon route.
    • LOL! Are you joking?? That wax SUCKS! 100% gimmick made to "look" good.    After just TWO winters I had severe surface rusting in patches over 90% of the frame. Only reason it looks great in the pics is because I SATURATED the frame every single fall with used motor oil for 14 of the 16 years I owned it. Otherwise it would've been sent to the crusher 8 years earlier with the speed it was rusting prior!    I sold that POS 3 years ago. Was a gigantic headache the second it rolled off the showroom floor. Brakes pulsated on the TEST DRIVE. Door trim fell off the 1st week! Interior squeaked and rattled, and the drivetrain clunked after 2k miles. 4x4 switch failed shortly after. Front end - ball joints, struts, hub bearings - all failed between 38k-50k. Engine started burning oil at 50k. Rear and and transmission failed before 100k. Nothing but problems, and frustration with the piss-poor engineering designed to make you give up. Well, it worked! Nothing on that truck was easy to remove ... except the wheels. They haven't figured out how to screw that up yet. Give 'em time ...   I won't make that mistake again. EVER.   Such fond memories ... https://postimg.cc/K1qf23tS  https://postimg.cc/gallery/X02z64J  https://postimg.cc/gallery/mHSRXZv  https://postimg.cc/gallery/D4mMRfL
    • Different monitors do their test only under conditions specific to that monitor.  you MIGHT find the drive cycle conditions for the monitor that isn't ready on this site: https://lemon-manuals.la/   If it's not there, then it should be on alldata.com for your truck, but it requires a paid subscription.   And you need to know which specific monitor isn't ready.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...