Jump to content

2010 Silverado Photos


Recommended Posts

Posted

Here it is. Only thing left to put on is the in-channel vent visors for the drivers and pass side doors. Couldnt do that because of the tint. Have to wait 3-4 days now.

 

Cabelas Bug Deflector

AVS In-Channel Window Vent Visors

GM 6" Black assist steps

Tractor Supply (Delta) Black Low Profile Toolbox

Line-X

Weathertech floor mats front and rear

GM Exhaust Tip

Front Drivers and Pass Side Windows Tinted (20%)

LPO Protection Pkg (mud flaps, bed rail protectors, and fender well guards)

DSC00958.JPG

DSC00960.JPG

DSC00958.JPG

DSC00960.JPG

DSC00958.JPG

DSC00960.JPG

DSC00958.JPG

DSC00960.JPG

Posted

 

:lol: Looks nice! I like the Chevy sticker on the rear passenger side. What kind of camera do you have? When you click to enlarge the pictures, they look really high-quality. :thumbs:

Posted

Sony DSC-W150 8.1 megapixels nothing special

Posted
Nice truck, how did you get away from your new baby?

 

What do you mean?

Posted
Is the Z71 decal on the 2010's different? It looks bigger in the pictures.

 

That decal comes with the WEA (Z71 Appearance) package.

Posted
Is the Z71 decal on the 2010's different? It looks bigger in the pictures.

 

It is bigger,The different Z71 decal is part of the "WEA" Z71 Appearance Pkg.,The ones on the non-WEA trucks are smaller.

Posted
Is the Z71 decal on the 2010's different? It looks bigger in the pictures.

 

It is bigger,The different Z71 decal is part of the "WEA" Z71 Appearance Pkg.,The ones on the non-WEA trucks are smaller.

 

 

 

Hey MS3Dale, you don't by chance have a GM part number for the WEA Z-71 decal do you? I am thinking of converting my Z-85 to a Z-71 (you know shocks, joices, front plate, etc). :thumbs:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...