Jump to content

Monroe Reflex


Recommended Posts

Posted

I just ordered a set of Monroe Reflex shocks for my HD. I know Bilsteins get great reviews but the Monroes seem to be well liked too and are quite a bit cheaper.

 

I only have 25k miles on my truck, but the stock shocks are almost 6 years old and they feel worn out. I get alot of bouncing and wheel hop that I don't remember having. Since shocks wear slowely over time most people don't even realize that they need replaced!

 

Hopefully these shocks will work out for me. I willl post my impressions once I get them and mount them up. I ordered a set for my buddies 2002 2500 Avalanche too so we will dbl team the trucks and put them on together which should make installation that much easier.

Posted

I ordered them from shockwharehouse.com. I have never ordered from them before but other members have. The price was very good I thought. $204 shipped.

Posted

My friend got some for he reg cab 2wd 2005 2500hd and he hates them. He said it tows like crap and bounces more

Posted

Installed the shocks today. Wow what a difference! Who would have thought that at 25K miles my shocks were that worn out! Rear wheel chatter/hop over compression joints is gone, front nose bobbing at stop signs is gone and just the basic wallow down the road and around corners in town is gone!

 

The truck feels much more planted now, and I think the valving in these shocks is much better suited to an HD truck than the skinny little stock tubes. Mine actually shipped from Rancho in CA so I agree that the Reflex and Rancho 5000 are basically the same shock.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Yeah Rancho and Monroe are actually both made by Tenneco, who also makes Dynomax Performance exhaust and Walker OE Replacement exhaust. Bilsteins aren't a bad shock but most people associate Bilstein with GM however depending on the year Tenneco had the OE GM contract for a while, then Bilstein, then now it's Tenneco again. The only thing is if you have a Z71 you MUST replace them with a mono tube shock, Monotubes are ONLY for the Z71's but you have to use them if you have the package.

Posted
My friend got some for he reg cab 2wd 2005 2500hd and he hates them. He said it tows like crap and bounces more

 

 

i take that back i guess they were a bad batch! they all were blew out! He has a new set and so far so good

Posted

the Reflex are great shocks. i cant count how many sets ive installed on various types of trucks & SUVs and i never had any complaints. they're a quality product at a great price and ride/perform great.

Posted

Im looking for some new shocks for my 2001 2500 HD im leaning towards rancho RS5000s anyone...my truck has 48K and is still on stock shocks. any other suggestions i know the monroe reflex is like the same thing i just like the rancho look and i think theyre a bit more rugged. are their any other shocks out there i should consider? Advanced Autos offering buy 3 shocks get the 4th free so i think nows a great time.

Thanks

 

-Kurt

  • 1 month later...
Posted
Yeah Rancho and Monroe are actually both made by Tenneco, who also makes Dynomax Performance exhaust and Walker OE Replacement exhaust. Bilsteins aren't a bad shock but most people associate Bilstein with GM however depending on the year Tenneco had the OE GM contract for a while, then Bilstein, then now it's Tenneco again. The only thing is if you have a Z71 you MUST replace them with a mono tube shock, Monotubes are ONLY for the Z71's but you have to use them if you have the package.

I'm about ready to pull the trigger and order mine.....I asked about Z/71 and the Reflex Monotube.....he said "they are the same" ???? (P/N 911152 and 911151) :cheers: ....mine is an '06....I think the Z/71 pkg was just skid plates....nothing suspension....I think

Posted

Z71 doesnt have rear sway bar either for more articulation. I have a set of reflexes on my 1/2 ton. Amazing over the stocks I replaced em at at 65k

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
    • I apologize, I missed this post, at risk of going off CURRENT TOPIC.   I'm not saying it is BS, I'm questioning how much information is being held back. GM is NOT going to spell out exactly every parameter in the algorithm. Liability, intellectual property, etc.    I'm not naive enough to believe that it is as simple as revolutions, coolant temperature, miles, time; are you?    I don't do irrational either, and boiling the OLM down to four simple values that I could code in an afternoon (I'm not a coder) is irrational - unless it suits your agenda to ignore it. 
    • Chris 21 I appreciate your constructive response. !!  😉😉😉   The 6.6 is gas.  Correct me if I’m wrong but by recalibrating the speedo you’re correcting the shift points of the transmission on these trucks.?.
    • That is a huge misconception.     Bigger does not always equal safer.  Modifying does not make it safer either, with exceptions.   Think of this.  Your truck in stock form is capable of emergency maneuvers, proper stopping distances, its handling is designed around the factory wheel/tire packages, etc.   37s and a lift?  Now you've affected your braking distances, handling and ride control.  You've raised your center of gravity higher.  Your front visibility is now obstructed more than stock, same for your rear.  Does it look cooler?  Yes.  Does it now work as good as it did from factory on road?  NO.       As for my mention of exceptions?  Say you had a sedan or crossover.  They typically come with all season tires.  If you swap out for a performance all season or a summer tire, you improve your car by lowering its stopping distance (better braking because of traction) and improve the handling (regular and emergency) of the vehicle.  That is an actually improving modification.  My old 2019 LD 1500, I ran UHP all season tires on 20in wheels in a factory offered size.  It improved all aspects of how it drove over the Duratracs it came with from the factory in the stock 18" tire.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...