Jump to content

Just Weighed My Truck


Recommended Posts

Posted

A new scrap yard just setup shop in my area, so I brought my 2500HD to the scales to see how much it weighed. The with a full tank of gas and about 150 lbs. of stuff (rubber bed mat and some tools underneath the ext cab seat) came out to be 5580lbs. I was expecting something around 6000-6200???. I asked the guy there about the scale and he showed me the documentation that it had just been certified. Doesn't this seem way off?

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I went to pick up some decorative rock at a local rock dealer (lol), and they weigh your vehicle before & after...my '04 CC HD weighed in at a whopping 6540lbs w/a near full tank of fuel, 285's on H2 wheels, and some other aftermarket goodies.

Posted
A new scrap yard just setup shop in my area, so I brought my 2500HD to the scales to see how much it weighed. The with a full tank of gas and about 150 lbs. of stuff (rubber bed mat and some tools underneath the ext cab seat) came out to be 5580lbs. I was expecting something around 6000-6200???. I asked the guy there about the scale and he showed me the documentation that it had just been certified. Doesn't this seem way off?

 

 

Your right,a 2500HD should be around 6k,If you post me your VIN I can run it and tell you the shipping weight from the factory.

Were also having this conversation over in the light-duty section as well.....http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?...p;#entry1004933

 

Got your VIN.....5905lbs.

Posted
I went to pick up some decorative rock at a local rock dealer (lol), and they weigh your vehicle before & after...my '04 CC HD weighed in at a whopping 6540lbs w/a near full tank of fuel, 285's on H2 wheels, and some other aftermarket goodies.

 

I assume its a DMAX? Sounds right for one of those,they seem to be around the 6400-6600 lb. range.

Posted
I went to pick up some decorative rock at a local rock dealer (lol), and they weigh your vehicle before & after...my '04 CC HD weighed in at a whopping 6540lbs w/a near full tank of fuel, 285's on H2 wheels, and some other aftermarket goodies.

 

I assume its a DMAX? Sounds right for one of those,they seem to be around the 6400-6600 lb. range.

 

 

For some reason, equivalent Ford and Dodge diesel trucks are heavier than Chevy and GMC ones. About 7000 - 7500 lbs for those. Maybe they use thicker rear bumpers? :rolleyes:

Posted
I went to pick up some decorative rock at a local rock dealer (lol), and they weigh your vehicle before & after...my '04 CC HD weighed in at a whopping 6540lbs w/a near full tank of fuel, 285's on H2 wheels, and some other aftermarket goodies.

 

I assume its a DMAX? Sounds right for one of those,they seem to be around the 6400-6600 lb. range.

 

 

For some reason, equivalent Ford and Dodge diesel trucks are heavier than Chevy and GMC ones. About 7000 - 7500 lbs for those. Maybe they use thicker rear bumpers? :rolleyes:

 

Much heavier tow hooks on the front as well :crackup:

Posted
I went to pick up some decorative rock at a local rock dealer (lol), and they weigh your vehicle before & after...my '04 CC HD weighed in at a whopping 6540lbs w/a near full tank of fuel, 285's on H2 wheels, and some other aftermarket goodies.

 

I assume its a DMAX? Sounds right for one of those,they seem to be around the 6400-6600 lb. range.

 

 

For some reason, equivalent Ford and Dodge diesel trucks are heavier than Chevy and GMC ones. About 7000 - 7500 lbs for those. Maybe they use thicker rear bumpers? :rolleyes:

 

 

Ford & Dodge have solid front axle, cast iron engine block & heads making a much heavier and stronger front end.

Posted
I went to pick up some decorative rock at a local rock dealer (lol), and they weigh your vehicle before & after...my '04 CC HD weighed in at a whopping 6540lbs w/a near full tank of fuel, 285's on H2 wheels, and some other aftermarket goodies.

 

I assume its a DMAX? Sounds right for one of those,they seem to be around the 6400-6600 lb. range.

 

 

For some reason, equivalent Ford and Dodge diesel trucks are heavier than Chevy and GMC ones. About 7000 - 7500 lbs for those. Maybe they use thicker rear bumpers? :rolleyes:

 

 

Ford & Dodge have solid front axle, cast iron engine block & heads making a much heavier and stronger front end.

 

 

Not to mention fatter asses in the driver's seats.

 

DEWFPO

Posted
I went to pick up some decorative rock at a local rock dealer (lol), and they weigh your vehicle before & after...my '04 CC HD weighed in at a whopping 6540lbs w/a near full tank of fuel, 285's on H2 wheels, and some other aftermarket goodies.

 

I assume its a DMAX? Sounds right for one of those,they seem to be around the 6400-6600 lb. range.

 

 

 

Actually it's a 6.0L...I was kinda shocked also. I don't suppose their scales are calibrated regularly anyways.

Posted

I would say that the weight might not be too far off. I remember getting my truck weighed back at FT Campbell and I was pretty surprised that it was several hundred pounds below 6000lbs. I remember my 2001 3/4ton Suburban weight was right at 6000-6100 pds so my truck being several hundred pds lighter surprized me. My truck is a pretty plain jain 3/4ton, 6.0L gasser, ext-cab 2wd. It has roll up windows, rubber floor.

Posted
I would say that the weight might not be too far off. I remember getting my truck weighed back at FT Campbell and I was pretty surprised that it was several hundred pounds below 6000lbs. I remember my 2001 3/4ton Suburban weight was right at 6000-6100 pds so my truck being several hundred pds lighter surprized me. My truck is a pretty plain jain 3/4ton, 6.0L gasser, ext-cab 2wd. It has roll up windows, rubber floor.

 

Additional options, such as power windows, locks cruise, extra insulation, power seats, etc could account for another 200 lbs or so. I just removed the driver's seat from my old Mercedes 300SD and the power seat weighs a ton! It has a huge gearbox base with 3 electric motors attached, and there is the fourth motor and gearbox in the seatback.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Well one of our most reliable vehicles was sold yesterday. The first and only I gave for free to a grandkid. If they got skin in the game they take care of it. My wife bought new. Five years later my daughter got it to use. We got it back and gave it to our grandson after graduation. He did zero maintenance just oil changes. When the AC quit he drove his mother’s car rather than get it fixed. Instead he just bought a beater and sold the Elantra. 
    • I usually do as well or better than the sticker for mileage. Usually better going west than east. North then South. Wind makes a difference. I’m not usually a conspiracy theorist. But it did dawn on me I’m going by the vehicle calculation. Now that would be interesting.
    • https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/fuel-economy-stickers-don-t-tell-the-whole-story-aaa-data-reveals-why/ar-AA26ocHk?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=6a4122ea3dae47e5b8dfbed5d4fd3d55&cvpid=648f6b4fc2fa4eddb4c12893aeb957ed&ei=59
    • What’s missing in all this is patience and investment in the future. Buy a 170K starter home. Ten years later sell it invest in a more expensive home. Eventually you’ll have a 600K home and pay starter home payments. Buy a starter car. Maintain it well. Save the payments after it’s payed for then buy an expensive car if you desire. Buy a tumbler make your own coffee, pack your lunch. Cook your own dinner. Most importantly take care of your car.
    • People mislead themselves. Statistics are highly useful indicators.   Here's the tie-in to this thread. If an oil sample tests shows a wear indicator of 7 using cheaper ACDelco oil, and a wear indicator of 2 (lower = less wear) using a particular brand of Mobil oil, and wear has a linear relationship with engine lifespan, anyone could assume that Mobil is reducing wear by more than 50% (let's just say a 200% reduction for you red state people trying hard to do math) which leads to increasing engine life by 2x. Perhaps, in a vacuum, by itself, when dreamed by AI.   Yeah?! That's what the statistic is saying, isn't it?   No, it isn't. It didn't come out and say engine life is doubled. That's a very bad assumption, and a case of severe myopia by assuming something potentially untrue about the only data point in focus.   Average cost of a new car is 50k. You bet it is.   The median cost of a new car is more like 35k. Expensive cars are skewing the perception that "average" now means a $50k price of entry for a very average automobile. And that's not true. People who don't understand statistics twist the living heck out of them to mean all sorts of things they don't actually mean.   "Average" new car payment is $1000/month. Yep, it is. And in that number are all the $35k new car buyers who bring significant equity, and the $25k new car buyers who finance the car for a month just to get a rebate, and then pay it off. Know what isn't in that number? All the payments made by people who don't finance a car.   Picking one's own data point (don't have a car payment, never paid $50k for a new vehicle, my house cost $170k, I afforded a middle class lifestyle on $4.50/hr) is just a data point. Just like earning $25/hr in an area where the median home price is almost $1 Million is a data point. In fact, it's a lot of data points given that 80% of the US population lives in/around major cities. They're not idiots; the vast majority of them do it to make a living because that's where the big money is.   The highs have become higher, lows have become lower, and how your personal mileage varies is not truth for an entire country. At the same time you can't NOT acknowledge the data. While it doesn't paint YOUR personal picture, it certainly tints the reality that you also live in, as does your single data point.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...