Jump to content

Front Driveshaft Always Suppose To Spin?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I was making a video of my trucks exhaust and for the hell of it i backed over the camera to get an underside shot and i noticed that my front drive shaft is clearly spinning when the truck is 2WD. Is this suppose to be?

Posted

Im pretty sure that everything that spins in 4wd also apins in 2wd, the only difference is that its not "locked in" like it is in 4wd............I think.

Posted

i dunno if its the same as the 900's, but if they have the auto transfer case and it is in auto mode, it will spin all the time even tho its not locked in. If it is in 2wd mode it wont spin.

Posted

all the 4wd systems i've seen regardless of brands have always had it spinning even if 4x4 isen't engaged

Posted
all the 4wd systems i've seen regardless of brands have always had it spinning even if 4x4 isen't engaged

 

Unless you have locking hubs. The only reason they spin now is because the wheels are attached to the axles, and that makes the front diff spin, which makes the drive shaft spin.

Posted

Manual transfer cases don't spin the front driveshaft in 2WD. My 2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser and 1985 Ford F150 did not spin the front driveshaft in 2WD. I haven't checked my 2005 Silverado 2500HD to see if it spins in 2WD.

 

DEWFPI

Posted
Manual transfer cases don't spin the front driveshaft in 2WD. My 2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser and 1985 Ford F150 did not spin the front driveshaft in 2WD. I haven't checked my 2005 Silverado 2500HD to see if it spins in 2WD.

 

DEWFPI

 

The front drive shaft will turn no matter what transfer case you have unless you have locking front hubs - that are unlocked.

Posted

This sucks. There should be manual or automatic locking hubs on the front axle. Without them, one pays a hefty fuel economy penalty. Spinning those axles and the differential uses energy due to friction. I sort of assumed that these trucks had automatic locking front hubs.

Posted
This sucks. There should be manual or automatic locking hubs on the front axle. Without them, one pays a hefty fuel economy penalty. Spinning those axles and the differential uses energy due to friction. I sort of assumed that these trucks had automatic locking front hubs.

 

the automatic locking front hubs on the 80's era GM/Chev trucks had a lot of problems (primarily, they would not unlock when you thought they were ... ) .. whatever is on the new trucks is considered by GM to be better ... (I still think manual locking hubs are the best,.... but omg you actually have to stop and get out of your 4wd vehicle and manually lock them .... omg, how inconvenient!!! ... and then when you are done with 4wd you have to stop AGAIN and manually unlock them!)

Posted
Manual transfer cases don't spin the front driveshaft in 2WD. My 2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser and 1985 Ford F150 did not spin the front driveshaft in 2WD. I haven't checked my 2005 Silverado 2500HD to see if it spins in 2WD.

 

DEWFPI

 

The front drive shaft will turn no matter what transfer case you have unless you have locking front hubs - that are unlocked.

 

 

Maybe in a GM product but that is not necessarily true of other manufacturers.

 

My 2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser with Part Time 4WD, does not spin the front driveshaft and does not have unlockable hubs. It does have an "Automatic Differential Disconnect". When I manually shift the transfer case into 4Hi or 4 Lo it mechanically engages the front driveshaft and thru an electrical actuator, connects the CV shafts to the front differential. The Part-time 4WD FJC"s get about 2 mpg better than the Full Time 4WD FJC's with a 3rd differential (Gleason-Torsen) in the Transfer Case.

 

Other manufactures may use different technologies but not all 4WD vehicles spin the front driveshaft in 2WD, even without unlockable hubs, that's a fact.

 

DEWFPO

Posted

My old 1988 F-150 with a manual t-case and auto locking hubs did not spin the front drive shaft.

 

The new trucks use CV axles mated to a differential. The differential is still hooked up to the front drive shaft, even though the actuators are not engaged, still causing the front drive shaft to spin some what due to friction, but not as much as when the vehicle is in 4wd.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Lake Speed is drumming up business for his company just by being in the spot-light so he has a vested interest in stoking the 0W-20 fire.  IMO  
    • I knew when I bought my truck that it had off road hill decent or craw control or whatever they call it and rolled my eyes at that but it gets throw on with other options my truck has, I just never had a heads up if the highway speed regular cruise setting had anything to do with the brakes and that took me by surprise. If you've ever been to the top of Pikes Peak and watched those ahead of you on the way down with their brake lights on constantly, one can guess they are probably not gearing down or not enough anyway if their vehicle will allow and a good reason their is a brake check spot part way down where they use an infra red heat gun to check how hot ones brakes are front and rear.    Your right that once one gets out of the front range by Denver and I've not been on that stretch of 285 between Denver and Fairplay myself but I know its high and Fairplay at 10000 feet, Buena Vista at 8000, it drops a bit from there but then your going back up and over the 11000 pass and Durango is at 6500 . So yes your definitely right that 6500 and a lot higher is the theme of going anywhere out in that direction from Denver but hey, the down hill sections give fantastic fuel mileage !.    I don't even look at the fuel pumps for what premium costs here, since I live on a farm and up to this point get fuel delivered I am rarely in front of a fuel pump and when I am, I am often using card lock bulk fuel stations so it tells me what the price is AFTER I buy the fuel. Looking up on gas buddy and converting to US gallons but in Canadian dollars, regular on average of the prices listed was around 5.95 and premium is around 7.00 . That was one reason I did not go for the 6.2 half ton aside from its lack of carrying/towing if one was going by the rule of using premium fuel and until recently one could only buy regular farm gas if playing the few cents off game for farm dyed fuel for a "farm licensed pickup". But yes I hear you on the fuel price difference and like the diesel theme with it often being more expensive then gas it doesn't have quite the charm to it either as it once did although right now here for some reason the price of diesel has come down more so its now inline with the price of regular gas. 
    • I agree with this assessment. As you know I’m testing longevity with vehicles for the first time. I have a few vehicles I passed to kids and grandkids. We’re all past 100K miles some approaching 170K. I’m the only one doing 5k oil changes. The rest whatever the minder says. I’m the only one doing frequent transmission service. My odyssey the trip vehicle at 200K will be finished as a trip vehicle. I recently changed to high mileage oil, Valvoline. I can’t get past the fact that all manufacturers want to claim long service life. I just don’t make sense that they would go with low weight oil for mileage. While sacrificing longevity.
    • There's absolutely a mountain of profit in catering to the "I do my own research" crowd, people who are certain they know better. And I don't mean there isn't data to support that 0w40 produces less wear product than 0w20 in an engine like the 3.0 Duramax, that only feeds them the assurance they need. Again, my whole thing with oil selection is, sure, 0w40 or 0w30 produces less wear product. Are we talking the difference between the engine lasting only 100k versus 200k? Or are we talking more like, if the engine will already go 350k on a good 0w20 regimen recommended by the OE, is using 0w40 going to get us to 355k, assuming we can even get the rest of the truck to last that long, meanwhile sacrificing the first 5y, 100k in powertrain warranty. The answer isn't easy, there are tradeoffs.   I willfully use 0w20 Dexos D for this reason, knowing that a 0w40 will produce slightly less wear. I don't believe the delta in wear product is meaningful over the lifetime of the engine, and I place much more importance on driving style and overall feeding and care of the engine as a whole. It's the mentality that someone can abstain from alcohol their whole life which is an amazing boost to health by itself, theoretically. But if they're sedentary, that lifestyle choice will most likely kill them young despite their other, concerted efforts. Maybe someone doesn't drink AND they are the perfect picture of health and activity AND they use 0w40 AND they treat their engine perfectly. If living until 130 years is the goal, sure, do that. But it's going to be a really old truck falling apart around a good engine for that last 30 years, without a doubt.   I watched Demonworks' other video on the 100k+ 3.0 Duramax that had dealer 0w20 changes on what appears to be OLM-prescribed intervals (8-10k).   The QR codes are still present and readable on the main bearings. That's how little wear it has.   That's not proof that anyone else should stick to 0w20, but it's confirmation, for me, that 0w20 is perfectly acceptable to use in these engines.
    • 1Based on independent testing of OE 0W-20 in the Peugeot TU3M Wear Test as required by the dexos1 Gen 2 specification.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...