Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't see where the 6.2L is getting discontinued.. just moved up to the HD class. They are not going to put the 7.0L in them as originally planned.

 

 

 

EXACTLY what took from it.And its all specutation,someones guessing what might happen,im reffering to the person that wrote the article

  • Like 1
Posted

So just wanted to chime in here a bit for my own information. I'm sseriouslyconsidering a 6.2L for my next truck, but had a few questions that were a little unclear on the previous posts.

- the HD springs that are referred to...are they the same width or is there just another spring in the pack? I ask because I've noticed on the 3/4 ton pickups the springs are now wider that they were in 2010 or 2011 (not sure when they made the change). I just wonder if my 5.3 Z71 has these HD springs already that are being referred to in the 6.2L versions of the truck. I've always been a bit peaved on the payload capacity....so this interests me.

- I would guess to the HD locker is the same in the 6.2L as it is in the 5.3L Z71.

- Same question with the 9.5" rear axle (same in 5.3L Z71 and 6.2L?)

One easy difference to spot (aside from the motor) it comes with rear disc which my truck (08 5.3L Z71) does not come with.

Comments? Thanks!!!

Posted (edited)

- I would guess to the HD locker is the same in the 6.2L as it is in the 5.3L Z71.

- Same question with the 9.5" rear axle (same in 5.3L Z71 and 6.2L?)

One easy difference to spot (aside from the motor) it comes with rear disc which my truck (08 5.3L Z71) does not come with.

Comments? Thanks!!!

  • edit: I stand corrected. See below

     

  • You'll only find the 9.5" rear end in the earlier Vmax trucks with the 6.0L or the newer 6.2L

     

  • You can have rear disk with the 5.3:L trucks as well as the 6.2L trucks. The only way to spot a 6.2L is the rear straight exit pipe. The 4.8's and 5.3's have a 90 degree bend in the exit.

     

 

Edited by Stevens11
Posted

NHT (Max trailering package) trucks DO NOT HAVE HD (referring to the HD Silverado and Sierra chassis group) springs. They have a slightly stiffer rate leaf spring pack, then the other 1/2 ton trucks yes, but they do not have "HD" springs

 

The Gov-Loc differential does work the same in an "HD" and 1/2 ton truck yes. Different axle assemblies all together but yes, the differential workings are the same.

 

NO 1/2 ton trucks sense '04 have had rear disc brakes unless they were a Vortec Max or Max trailering package truck with the 9.5" rear axle assembly.

Posted

I think they will keep the 6.2 around for the1500 possibly enhance with AFM. I like pickuptruck.com but they're just speculating. They're also not accurate when they said the 6.2 was available in 2007+ models. With all the power options available out there I see the demand for a 6.2. My 2cents.

Posted

They're also not accurate when they said the 6.2 was available in 2007+ models. .

 

 

Yes it was available in 2007-up... in the Denali and Caddy's :thumbs:

Posted

Sorry I meant to say that the article said that you could get the 6.2 in 2007+ Silverado models. Should have been the 2009+ Silverados. No biggie I just get frazzled when they make mistakes like that. Angry me.

Posted

I think they will keep the 6.2 around for the1500 possibly enhance with AFM. I like pickuptruck.com but they're just speculating. They're also not accurate when they said the 6.2 was available in 2007+ models. With all the power options available out there I see the demand for a 6.2. My 2cents.

 

 

Rumors flying on the net that GM will move the 6.2 to the HD models while the 1500 series is getting a direct injection most likely in 5.3L for improved gas mileage and power. I haven't heard anything other than that atm.

Posted (edited)

Which is considered faster/quicker the 2wd or the 4wd version? Extended Cab or Crew Cabs? Considering they each would have the same gearing in differential's. I myself have yet to run a silverado with 6.2 but have ran a GMC Denali Crew 08-09 and I came out the winner in that case, not sure his mods but he did have a K/N sticker on his rear tailgate.

Edited by RyanbabZ71
Posted (edited)

Which is considered faster/quicker the 2wd or the 4wd version? Extended Cab or Crew Cabs? Considering they each would have the same gearing in differential's.

 

Simple......... do the math...... Given the same tires on each vehicle, it's pure power to weight ratio.

Edited by wavery
Posted

Which is considered faster/quicker the 2wd or the 4wd version? Extended Cab or Crew Cabs? Considering they each would have the same gearing in differential's. I myself have yet to run a silverado with 6.2 but have ran a GMC Denali Crew 08-09 and I came out the winner in that case, not sure his mods but he did have a K/N sticker on his rear tailgate.

 

Which is considered faster/quicker the 2wd or the 4wd version? Extended Cab or Crew Cabs? Considering they each would have the same gearing in differential's.

 

Simple......... do the math...... Given the same tires on each vehicle, it's pure power to weight ratio.

 

 

 

Well according to GMC.com

 

4X4 extended cab curb weight = 5330 / 4X2 = 5092

4X4 crew cab cube weight = 5372 / 4X2 = 5120

So the difference is a few hundred pounds which means a lot if your a serious drag racer wanting to shave a few .01 secs off your quarter time. In real life it would be the difference a the amount of passengers. The difference in the drivers means a lot more. So to answer your question is doesn't really matter xc or cc. You should go with the cc for the room and 4X4 because why not have the 4X4 capability, I mean why buy a 2X4 truck???? Hope that answers your question.

Posted (edited)

People buy 2x4 truck because thats what they want! Or, like me, they may not ever get off the pavement! I don't like how they sit! I don't like lifts or leveling! But I like trucks! :D

Edited by RyanbabZ71
Posted (edited)

SMH Don't like lifts or leveling??? To each their own, I defiantly don't plan on taking my luxury truck off road either. I just wanted the 4X4 capability because you never know. And pulling a boat up a slippery boat ramp, 4X4 is a plus. Not having because 4X4 because you don't think you will need it is like not wearing a condom cuz you don't plan on getting a girl pregnant. LOLZ

Edited by RyanbabZ71
Posted (edited)

I understand the pros and where you coming from with having a 4x4! But its not a biggie with me and my lifestyle! If I was a outdoors-man,I mean a TRUE one then yes, I would have one or one just for hunting or fishing! I like trucks because I like the room in them while you drive. I mean these new truck are comfortable. The worst part about having a truck is, when people move for one place to another, they ALWAYS want touse your truck or help them move with your truck! I hate that!

Edited by RyanbabZ71
Posted

I just wanted the 4X4 capability because you never know. And pulling a boat up a slippery boat ramp, 4X4 is a plus. Not having because 4X4 because you don't think you will need it is like not wearing a condom cuz you don't plan on getting a girl pregnant. LOLZ

 

 

loool...I see it the same way...a truck w/o 4x4 is like a dog w/o teeth.

 

In the area I live in I actually don't need 4x4. But even in the couple of weeks we get snow around here I like to go away from the intersection and not scratch on the snow like a hen.

:rolleyes:

 

so long

j-ten-ner

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,913
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Smitty462
    Newest Member
    Smitty462
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 693 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...