Jump to content

New Truck


jdubub

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks. It is strong. This 5.0 with 3.73s is strong as hell. I'm impressed with it only being a 5.0.

 

 

Soon I will be purchasing the power extend and power fold tows.

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Congrats on the new truck!! I hope you continue to enjoy it.

Posted

:puke:

 

I hate the way the F-150 looks...........Strong power plant though that's for sure. As long as you like it that's what counts. If it had the Raptor body I would probably own an F-150 myself......Keep us posted on how she treats you.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

That FX4 is really nice.

 

I have always bought GM trucks, but one of Fords videos caught my attention awhile back dealing with structure.

There are several that follow it.

 

Ran some insurance quotes between Ford GM Dodge this past summer & Ford was a couple bucks cheaper.

Dodge or Ram on the other hand was always the highest. On a side note, it did not matter on the GM truck whether

it had a 5.3 or 6.2.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQET-JW81DE&list=PL7A7928FBDF2B8545&index=3&feature=plpp_video

Posted

Still LOVE the truck. Only 2500 miles on it. The mpg is awesome in this thing. I booked it at 90mph the other day from Dallas to Houston. Averaged 15.8mpg and it never had to down shift.

 

I'm only 24, so my insurance rates are high for another 6 months, but on a truck that is newer and more expensive than my Z71 I traded, somehow my insurance went down $5 a month lol.

 

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

Posted

That FX4 is really nice.

 

I have always bought GM trucks, but one of Fords videos caught my attention awhile back dealing with structure.

There are several that follow it.

 

Ran some insurance quotes between Ford GM Dodge this past summer & Ford was a couple bucks cheaper.

Dodge or Ram on the other hand was always the highest. On a side note, it did not matter on the GM truck whether

it had a 5.3 or 6.2.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQET-JW81DE&list=PL7A7928FBDF2B8545&index=3&feature=plpp_video

 

 

Isn't this the same guy who made the video bad mouthing the Ram's rear coil spring suspension? Talk about talking up one company. Personally, my bumper is what is going to be what takes the most of the brunt in a collision so I really could care less if I don't have a "structure" around my engine bay. If the design was so horrible for GM I pretty sure the "Safety" people would have pulled the vehicle off the road long ago.

Posted

It's all sales propaganda. They all do it.

 

 

Yeah, he has to be on the Ford pay roll, think he has/had a radio show or something at one point. Maybe still does?

 

Just makes me curious how the trucks all work or are suppose to work structurally.

 

There was a crash test a few years ago between a 50's Chevy car & a new Malibu. The driver or crash test dummy in the Malibu was protected while the other was not. So just a bunch of steel out front doesn't make the total difference. Just interesting is all.

Posted

I guess as long as you hit something at the frame height you would be fine, but if you plan on taking on something higher than your frame you might want the extra protection in the engine bay.

Posted

True, but average vehicle is lower than that. Plus front structure wouldn't help in a side or rear end collision. Either way, I've got too much time, money & memories invested in this truck to trade in right this moment

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

New retrofitted lights are in. FX-R IV's, 3", 5,000k D2S for heads and 5,000k in fogs. Good projectors are effing awesome!

de6e2eda.jpg

emu5epy3.jpg

8ypepe2u.jpg

y7e8anuh.jpg

 

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

  • 2 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My son got a hatchback withe the aero package for like 17k new. Great little car with amazing MPH
    • Yeah, I've given up years ago with that! I was able to load a few when I first joined the site sometime around '07. Then after maybe 20 pics, it said I exceeded the limit. Now every pic I try to post says I've "exceeded 1mb".   ONE MB??? That's Windows 95 ******, lol!! 
    • I get the same results with pictures. Then I figure it out. Then I forget. Screw it.
    • I guess I'm the only one on this forum who can't get effing pics to load here! Do you have to resize them to post, or am I just blocked from uploads?   I have the same luck with automotive electronics ... but this is the ONLY site on the net that I have this problem!   I'd post pics of what I'm working on ... but I CAN'T! 🤬       Just fabbed up the kickdown cable (had to extend the cable mount WAAAY out from the throttle shaft to get a full pull), and parts arrived for the fuel lines on the 940 carb conversion project. Should be able to drive this thing by the end of the day. If not for work, I'd have had this thing done SIX weeks ago.   Got the jetting sorted out last week. Had a real bad tip-in bog that I couldn't seem to correct. Friggin float height was over 11mm too HIGH! eBay purchase, so no wonder everything is screwed up right out of the box! I ended up with a larger dual-squirt accelerator pump jet anyway instead of the single. Also moved the 70 primary idle jet (4 sizes too big out of the box) to the secondary idle circuit, and installed a 57 in the primary. Runs great on the fuel bottle!    Still using the computer for ignition. Going to drive it first and see if I want to go through the project of installing an intermediate shaft with a distributor drive gear, so I can install a block-mounted distributor and run points, 100% computer free. I should do that anyway just from a simplicity / reliability / tunability standpoint. The electronics left me stranded last year a couple times! I can't tweak the timing to my liking right now because of the computer. Tried twisting the cam-driven distributor already ... and the damned thing just reverts back to where it was! That's infuriating. But if it runs well enough I might save that for next season.   Just driving it in and out of the shop to work on other projects, it feels 1,000% more responsive with the carburetor. Also fires MUCH faster when cranking. Can't wait to drive it and see if I got more than 114 ponies, lolol.   Hopefully these don't go 404 like the last post ... https://postimg.cc/gallery/MjhrmZS   Seems like that site went back to dial-up internet! Maybe they'll fix that some day ...
    • Triumph makes me think of cars not bikes. Especially with model names like the TR7, that was a Triumph car model too. Peak TR for me was the TR250. You could retain the post-war roadster looks, with an optional surrey hard top, but with an inline 6 engine instead of the TR4's anemic 4-cylinder, but still have a 4 speed, optional overdrive.   I know almost nothing about Triumph bikes, except that they exist. Good looking bikes though.   I don't know if I could just have one vehicle. The Silverado does it all except for fitting anywhere. But it leaves a void in real driving enjoyment, unless driving an extremely large sofa is your thing.   What did I do to my 'other' (muslce car - which one!?) vehicle lately. I took my '23 SS for a drive. It's only got 1600 miles. I keep reminding myself I shouldn't be so precious about this car. It likes to be driven. Needs to be driven. Life is short and if I don't enjoy it, someone else will. The other half calls it "the garage ornament".
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...