Jump to content

Prius beats my 2013 6.2 Silverado


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have three speed limiters currently in place. 1. Aerodynamics 2. The financial ramifications of a huge fine and no driver's license. 3. Iowa deer. Plenty of them and I'd rather not meet one at 100+ mph. I must admit, I am curious where this truck would top out. Or lift off... Sits a little high to find out.

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I have three speed limiters currently in place. 1. Aerodynamics 2. The financial ramifications of a huge fine and no driver's license. 3. Iowa deer. Plenty of them and I'd rather not meet one at 100+ mph. I must admit, I am curious where this truck would top out. Or lift off... Sits a little high to find out.

Ya, I don't like doin past 110-120. I have before couple times, buried the needle and kept goin dunno how fast i was goin. 35's scare me at that speed...stupid really shouldn't do that.

 

Sometimes you still gotta remember its a truck

Posted

You guys all make me feel slow. My limiter on both my trucks is 258 mph.... or the limits of EFILive on the LS1B controller. Never tried the 04 stockish.... the 05 can do maybe 125 mph and that's about it. My tools and crap that weigh it down to the 7500-8000 lb mark just kill it's landspeed capability when it runs out of rpm in third and shifts into overdrive. Empty would be different but it's never empty. My old SRT8 shut down around the 180 mph mark... and that was just aerodynamics by that point, not a limiter in the pcm.

 

Trucks weight, size and crappy tires, and garbage driveshafts are not meant for speed. Doesn't mean people don't try though.

Posted

I don't see a need to go past 160km or (98mph) by this logic my old 1990 cutlass would smoke my truck I got the little bastard up around 190km.

 

I do wish I had a diesel so I could roll coal with my tow mirrors out.

Maybe next truck I'll get a cummins,,,

Posted

The guy I know with the 97 Cummins (for sale FYI) blew off an intercooler boot running to the fire station. He said it was because of his turbo building boost all the way up a hill, I'm pretty sure it was because of his tow mirrors making too much power.

Posted

The guy I know with the 97 Cummins (for sale FYI) blew off an intercooler boot running to the fire station. He said it was because of his turbo building boost all the way up a hill, I'm pretty sure it was because of his tow mirrors making too much power.

 

I was behind a thrashed Ram from the same era yesterday at a McDonald's drive through and he had the mirrors flipped up, along with a single smoke stack that was likely stolen from the Titanic. :lol:

Posted

 

 

His is at 7:42. Since then he's added duals, a flatbed, and 50k miles. Also he changed it to not blow smoke all over. :lol:

 

He's well over 300k on that truck and decided he needs something nicer and more reliable.

Posted

I was behind a thrashed Ram from the same era yesterday at a McDonald's drive through and he had the mirrors flipped up, along with a single smoke stack that was likely stolen from the Titanic. :lol:

 

 

:crackup: Gotta love that!

  • 9 months later...
Posted

 

 

I'm an old Dmax gear head and would laugh every time I played this video, no matter how many time I played it because I am surrounded by my Cummins gear head friends. I think you guys will get a kick out of it.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I'd love to see what a tall geared 6.2/6 speed can do. My 6.0/4 speed/3.42 hit 151 mph on a dyno

 

Sent from my DROID RAZR MAXX using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2

late last summer, in a momentary lapse of reason shocked a c63amg and an idiot in a cl 550 benz. left the the cl behind and while i backed off at around 190km from about 110km/hr. when i backed off and the amg went buy he had the wtf look on his face!! again momentary lapse of reason, but it was fun for the moment. for the record i don't normally drive like that for many a good reason.

Posted

I'd love to see what a tall geared 6.2/6 speed can do. My 6.0/4 speed/3.42 hit 151 mph on a dyno

 

Sent from my DROID RAZR MAXX using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2

 

It wouldn't touch 150, and in the slim chance it would, it would take miles and miles of road.

 

The car in my sig is only capable of 160ish, but is then limited by drag. It would take a lot more than stock 6.2 to make a 5,000 lb vehicle shaped like a refrigerator on wheels to hit 150 in the real world.

Posted

Like said im talking on a dyno.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

You guys all make me feel slow. My limiter on both my trucks is 258 mph.... or the limits of EFILive on the LS1B controller. Never tried the 04 stockish.... the 05 can do maybe 125 mph and that's about it. My tools and crap that weigh it down to the 7500-8000 lb mark just kill it's landspeed capability when it runs out of rpm in third and shifts into overdrive. Empty would be different but it's never empty. My old SRT8 shut down around the 180 mph mark... and that was just aerodynamics by that point, not a limiter in the pcm.

 

Trucks weight, size and crappy tires, and garbage driveshafts are not meant for speed. Doesn't mean people don't try though.

 

SRT8......180? Hmmmm........

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...