Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Anyone with a BDS 4" lift and Stock 20s? How far does the stock wheels stick out?

 

 

Member pancepance has been running a BDS 4" since the middle of this past summer I believe and he has the stock AT 20s

 

He has pictures of the set up in this thread. Post # 280. He's running 275/65/20 tires. Looks good

Edited by Mike1220
Posted

I hate to bring this up again, but I am still having trouble with my stabilitrak kicking in when I make sharp turns at normal speed. I have had the alignment checked and set to factory specs and had the steering angle sensor re calibrated back to zero. The thing is i don't think the factory alignment specs will work as that is for stock suspension. Now that the truck is lifted, it will be slightly different. Can someone who doesn't have an issue and has the Zone 6.5" lift kit installed post up their alignment specs that were used? Usually you will get a printout of the alignment. The specs are in the back of the Zone kit manual, but i have been told that is stock. The toe may need to be tweaked. Thanks.

I do get the traction control kicking in every once in a while. I didn't notice it at all for about the first week, but if i hit a slow speed turn too fast like in town somewhere it will kick in for a second. Also seems to be pretty consistant when pulling out of my work, wheels turned, pulling out from a stop to merge into traffic it will kick in for a second like my tires are spinning but they aren't... I am puzzled also. Mine is nowhere near as bad as the other 2 i have seen do this. It happens so little its almost a non issue but i would like to know what is causing it. I actually called Zone about it for a customers truck and zone said it could NOT be the lift since it complies with the federal mandated stability testing... My customer did tell me he put his stock wheels and tires back on and it didnt do it anymore. I have not tried that because like i said mine doesnt really happen enough to be a problem... As for alignment, i think that may have something to do with why it's worse on some trucks than others. I cut the recommended 5/8 off my outer tie rods and 3/8 off my inners and when i went to align it, my tie rods were bottomed out and couldnt get my toe in line. Had to pull it back apart and cut an additional 1/4 off each inner tie rod to properly set the toe. Camber and Toe specs are the same for factory and zone, zone does recommend a bit higher caster than factory. I think zone makes a good product and i have no regrets whatsoever about installing their lift, but it does seem like they may have an issue since there are multiple trucks with this lift having the same issue. Wonder if the bds has the same problem? Its basically the same lift design...

Posted

Got my new tow mirrors put on... now I just need to tint the amber on them and on the headlights

 

20141030_130324_zpsqxj72euh.jpg

Nice. You notice an slight increase with those? Also was the harness (assuming their powered) adapter PNP with original?

Posted (edited)

I do get the traction control kicking in every once in a while. I didn't notice it at all for about the first week, but if i hit a slow speed turn too fast like in town somewhere it will kick in for a second. Also seems to be pretty consistant when pulling out of my work, wheels turned, pulling out from a stop to merge into traffic it will kick in for a second like my tires are spinning but they aren't... I am puzzled also. Mine is nowhere near as bad as the other 2 i have seen do this. It happens so little its almost a non issue but i would like to know what is causing it. I actually called Zone about it for a customers truck and zone said it could NOT be the lift since it complies with the federal mandated stability testing... My customer did tell me he put his stock wheels and tires back on and it didnt do it anymore. I have not tried that because like i said mine doesnt really happen enough to be a problem... As for alignment, i think that may have something to do with why it's worse on some trucks than others. I cut the recommended 5/8 off my outer tie rods and 3/8 off my inners and when i went to align it, my tie rods were bottomed out and couldnt get my toe in line. Had to pull it back apart and cut an additional 1/4 off each inner tie rod to properly set the toe. Camber and Toe specs are the same for factory and zone, zone does recommend a bit higher caster than factory. I think zone makes a good product and i have no regrets whatsoever about installing their lift, but it does seem like they may have an issue since there are multiple trucks with this lift having the same issue. Wonder if the bds has the same problem? Its basically the same lift design...

That makes since as I called a Zone rep about an hour away that installs these kits. He mentioned the tie rod cut needs to be just right. I also called Zone and they think their engineers may be able to help with me supplying some measurements of before and after, etc. I have my first alignment paperwork from the shop who installed the kit and from a dealership who checked the alignment and reset the steering sensor. I am going t have a shop check it one more time and I am going to give them the paperwork and the specs from the Zone kit manual for them to compare and see if they can come up with something. if not, I am going to have GM run diags on my speed sensors. I am not pulling any codes with my scanner though, so hopefully not a faulty sensor and I do not get any lights on any other time than sharp turns. The shop also said you also need to have all the cuts just right. I remember the shop who installed my kit mention afterwards they had to do a lot of cutting and grinding for this kit.

Edited by badchevy
Posted

Finally got them shiny side up.

I'm not 100% satisfied with the outcome. I just don't know exactly why just yet.

Hoping that in a few days I will figure out what I want to do different but overall I like it. Just not sure I consider it "done" yet.

Opinions are appreciated. Maybe someone will hit on what I am not seeing. Might be wheels, tires, rake, etc. Its just something.

attachicon.gifphoto 2.JPG

attachicon.gifphoto 3.JPG

attachicon.gifphoto 5.JPG

So you have any pictures of your tuck straight ahead? Or behind? Trying to figure or how much the lift pushes out the front
Posted

Nice. You notice an slight increase with those? Also was the harness (assuming their powered) adapter PNP with original?

Slight increase in what?

 

The mirrors did plug right in but to get everything to work the way it was intended took some rewiring.

Posted

Slight increase in what?

 

The mirrors did plug right in but to get everything to work the way it was intended took some rewiring.

haha, looks like the a ghost took my words that should have been there. I was referring to wind noise. Did you notice an increase in wind noise with those bigger/flatter mirrors on the truck?

Posted (edited)

I'm struggling to find pics of the RCX 5". Does anyone have pics of this setup?

 

My goal is to run a RCX 5" with stock wheels on 35s.

Edited by JustABlackZ71
Posted

Anyone with a BDS 4" lift and Stock 20s? How far does the stock wheels stick out?

 

The lift pushes the front wheels out 1.5 inches

Posted

Slight increase in what?

 

The mirrors did plug right in but to get everything to work the way it was intended took some rewiring.

Do you recall what worked with plug and play? I am going this route and even found a manual fold and power fold set. I do not have power fold, but I hear you may be able to add the switch and maybe swap a harness. Wasn't too crazy about rewiring but will if I have to.

Posted

haha, looks like the a ghost took my words that should have been there. I was referring to wind noise. Did you notice an increase in wind noise with those bigger/flatter mirrors on the truck?

No... Haven't really noticed any. I probably will now though... Thanks LOL

Posted (edited)

Do you recall what worked with plug and play? I am going this route and even found a manual fold and power fold set. I do not have power fold, but I hear you may be able to add the switch and maybe swap a harness. Wasn't too crazy about rewiring but will if I have to.

Here's a really good thread that has a ton of info. This is where my mirrors are from and it's where I got my info on wiring. Let me know if you have any questions. I'll do my best. I just figured this was better than me trying to explain everything

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/164349-201415-hd-powerfold-oem-tow-mirrors-the-ones-weve-been-waiting-for/

Edited by DCOX
Posted

Here's a really good thread that has a ton of info. This is where my mirrors are from and it's where I got my info on wiring. Let me know if you have any questions. I'll do my best. I just figured this was better than me trying to explain everything

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/164349-201415-hd-powerfold-oem-tow-mirrors-the-ones-weve-been-waiting-for/

Thanks! Yeah, I have been following this site myself the past week or so. I just can't seem to find anyone who has posted much about a 2014 that had the standard mirrors and added these DQS mirrors. I saw you had a 2014 and thought maybe we have/had a similar setup. Really wish I knew what would work if I just plug those mirrors in my 2014 what would work without any modification. I only have heat and power adjust so I am assuming that is it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,564 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...