Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I switched from a 2003 6.0 gas 2500 to the 2014 5.3. Rough numbers with just a 5 mpg improvement show a $1,000 annual fuel savings with 15,000 miles a year. I will most likely have less miles though as we drive our other cars more.

Posted

Ok, we returned from the trip that we went on. The raw data after filling up for the above pictures 380 miles total before starting trip. The truck took 19.5 gallons and mpg worked out to 19.48 mpg on the 1st tank. Here are some pictures of the trip that had about 250 miles of mountain driving and flat land driving the rest of the way for a total of 1154 miles. So it works out this way. 1154 - 380 = 774 miles for the trip. On the trip we burned 37.5 gallons of gas for a gas mileage of 20.64 overall.

 

The best of it.

 

 

 

The part that has the most wow took place on the flat land. It was a reduce speed zone that went forever. The posted limit was 55mph and I set the cruise at 57mph. The CHP had people pull over on both sides of the freeway. In case you can't read it because the road was rough. The current mpg on the left said 28mpg. The best at 50 miles was 25.7 mpg and the avg. was 25.7 mpg

 

 

 

For the best 25 mile club went to this picture. Cruise set at 70mph. That was on flat land driving near Delano, CA on Interstate 99 going to Bakerfield, CA.

 

 

 

impressive for sure. if you don't speed with these things, they are unbelievable.

Posted

Just picked up my new truck yesterday out of state so I had a 248 mile journey home. Its a 4X4 Denali with the 6.2 and once I was outside of St. Louis rush hour traffic I was running 75 to 80 most of the way home. Figured at the pump I averaged 18.48 MPG...Display showed 18.6. I am tickled pink with these numbers on a brand new truck that had 6 miles on it when I left the lot. The motor feels tight and I can only imagine it will get better with some mileage.

Posted

I got tired of the uphill battle with my fuel economy and basically got a buy back and got the 2015 2500 denali. Getting 3mpg better than my 2014 with 3.08 gears after the first 250 miles.

 

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk

Posted

I got tired of the uphill battle with my fuel economy and basically got a buy back and got the 2015 2500 denali. Getting 3mpg better than my 2014 with 3.08 gears after the first 250 miles.

 

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk

When did you do that?!

Posted

Monday. It sure feels Iike a truck with the 4 or so inches higher and the stiffer ride. Got 18mpg on the drive to town this morning. Woot!

 

Don't get me wrong, I know the truck costs more and the maintenance is more. I'm not thinking this will cost me less long term, but I made a sacrifice in usability with the last truck for fuel economy and was keeping my old 2500 for heavy stuff. Now I can sell it.

 

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk

Posted

IMG-20140423-00121_zps1af115f7.jpgI thought I would chime in and share today's mileage. Just so it's known, my commute to work from my house is 3.5 miles of dirt road to 40 miles of freeway driving to 4 miles of light to light. I have a Silverado CC SB w/ 5.3 and 3.42's. My normal average has been consistently between 20 and 22 mpg hand figured at each fill up. I have now personally put close to 9k miles on my truck, so it has seen its share of full tanks to conclude the average. Today must have been a fluke or hte truck was in a really good mood. On the way to work this morning at mile 41 of my commute, I happend to look down and see my DIC showing....Well, if I say it you probably wouldn't believe it. So, the picture should say it all....

Posted

Well...since there is another recall...I'll be letting my dealer take a look at the mileage issue early.

 

Hopefully Friday or early next week.

Posted

2nd fill up on the new truck....18.1 hand calculated with the DIC showing 18.8. This is about 80% or so highway mileage. Not to shabby for a big ole 6.2L.

Posted

Mine's about 20MPG mix of highway/city/mountains, and I'm not babying it. If I did, it'd be a bit higher.

 

5.3L

Posted (edited)

Driving my 6.2 like a grandma still didn't get the ratings others have shown here. I get my best rating at about 45 mph with almost 30 mpg. My DIC best of 25 mpg is when stuck on a very long 55 mph highway. My DIC does jump around a little bit, but has averaged out to .5 mpg above actual usages. I'm still getting about the same mpg as my old 1995 Nissan V6 pickup I've had the last 15 years, so I'm happy about that when it's mixed with all of the extra room, four doors, towing capacity, payload, 4WD, and comfort. I think if the trans would just shift gears it could get better mpg and be smoother, coming from only driving stick shifts I expect it to be positive and this frustrates a lot. Here is my records so far with a mix of trying to get the best mpg and some playing in the mountains.

 

gallery_129354_2624_9995.png

Edited by Crf450r420
Posted

I average ~20MPG, city/mountains/highway combined. Not bad for a truck this size with a 5.3L engine.

My '02 w/4.8L averaged 16MPG on the same trips.

Posted (edited)

I completed a 172 mile drive with my best gas mileage getting 23.2 on a 50 mile average. I average the whole trip at 20.4 and that is with the new 6.2 L in a crew cab 2014 Denali 4x4 doing 70 miles an hour down the interstate and in and around Nashville. That's better then my F150 eco-boost i had. Very happy so far. My lifetime average for 552 miles is 17.3. Not bad

 

 

Sent from my iPad mini using Tapatalk

Edited by dodgehemi0

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,351 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...