Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I switched from a 2003 6.0 gas 2500 to the 2014 5.3. Rough numbers with just a 5 mpg improvement show a $1,000 annual fuel savings with 15,000 miles a year. I will most likely have less miles though as we drive our other cars more.

Posted

Ok, we returned from the trip that we went on. The raw data after filling up for the above pictures 380 miles total before starting trip. The truck took 19.5 gallons and mpg worked out to 19.48 mpg on the 1st tank. Here are some pictures of the trip that had about 250 miles of mountain driving and flat land driving the rest of the way for a total of 1154 miles. So it works out this way. 1154 - 380 = 774 miles for the trip. On the trip we burned 37.5 gallons of gas for a gas mileage of 20.64 overall.

 

The best of it.

 

 

 

The part that has the most wow took place on the flat land. It was a reduce speed zone that went forever. The posted limit was 55mph and I set the cruise at 57mph. The CHP had people pull over on both sides of the freeway. In case you can't read it because the road was rough. The current mpg on the left said 28mpg. The best at 50 miles was 25.7 mpg and the avg. was 25.7 mpg

 

 

 

For the best 25 mile club went to this picture. Cruise set at 70mph. That was on flat land driving near Delano, CA on Interstate 99 going to Bakerfield, CA.

 

 

 

impressive for sure. if you don't speed with these things, they are unbelievable.

Posted

Just picked up my new truck yesterday out of state so I had a 248 mile journey home. Its a 4X4 Denali with the 6.2 and once I was outside of St. Louis rush hour traffic I was running 75 to 80 most of the way home. Figured at the pump I averaged 18.48 MPG...Display showed 18.6. I am tickled pink with these numbers on a brand new truck that had 6 miles on it when I left the lot. The motor feels tight and I can only imagine it will get better with some mileage.

Posted

I got tired of the uphill battle with my fuel economy and basically got a buy back and got the 2015 2500 denali. Getting 3mpg better than my 2014 with 3.08 gears after the first 250 miles.

 

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk

Posted

I got tired of the uphill battle with my fuel economy and basically got a buy back and got the 2015 2500 denali. Getting 3mpg better than my 2014 with 3.08 gears after the first 250 miles.

 

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk

When did you do that?!

Posted

Monday. It sure feels Iike a truck with the 4 or so inches higher and the stiffer ride. Got 18mpg on the drive to town this morning. Woot!

 

Don't get me wrong, I know the truck costs more and the maintenance is more. I'm not thinking this will cost me less long term, but I made a sacrifice in usability with the last truck for fuel economy and was keeping my old 2500 for heavy stuff. Now I can sell it.

 

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk

Posted

IMG-20140423-00121_zps1af115f7.jpgI thought I would chime in and share today's mileage. Just so it's known, my commute to work from my house is 3.5 miles of dirt road to 40 miles of freeway driving to 4 miles of light to light. I have a Silverado CC SB w/ 5.3 and 3.42's. My normal average has been consistently between 20 and 22 mpg hand figured at each fill up. I have now personally put close to 9k miles on my truck, so it has seen its share of full tanks to conclude the average. Today must have been a fluke or hte truck was in a really good mood. On the way to work this morning at mile 41 of my commute, I happend to look down and see my DIC showing....Well, if I say it you probably wouldn't believe it. So, the picture should say it all....

Posted

Well...since there is another recall...I'll be letting my dealer take a look at the mileage issue early.

 

Hopefully Friday or early next week.

Posted

2nd fill up on the new truck....18.1 hand calculated with the DIC showing 18.8. This is about 80% or so highway mileage. Not to shabby for a big ole 6.2L.

Posted

Mine's about 20MPG mix of highway/city/mountains, and I'm not babying it. If I did, it'd be a bit higher.

 

5.3L

Posted (edited)

Driving my 6.2 like a grandma still didn't get the ratings others have shown here. I get my best rating at about 45 mph with almost 30 mpg. My DIC best of 25 mpg is when stuck on a very long 55 mph highway. My DIC does jump around a little bit, but has averaged out to .5 mpg above actual usages. I'm still getting about the same mpg as my old 1995 Nissan V6 pickup I've had the last 15 years, so I'm happy about that when it's mixed with all of the extra room, four doors, towing capacity, payload, 4WD, and comfort. I think if the trans would just shift gears it could get better mpg and be smoother, coming from only driving stick shifts I expect it to be positive and this frustrates a lot. Here is my records so far with a mix of trying to get the best mpg and some playing in the mountains.

 

gallery_129354_2624_9995.png

Edited by Crf450r420
Posted

I average ~20MPG, city/mountains/highway combined. Not bad for a truck this size with a 5.3L engine.

My '02 w/4.8L averaged 16MPG on the same trips.

Posted (edited)

I completed a 172 mile drive with my best gas mileage getting 23.2 on a 50 mile average. I average the whole trip at 20.4 and that is with the new 6.2 L in a crew cab 2014 Denali 4x4 doing 70 miles an hour down the interstate and in and around Nashville. That's better then my F150 eco-boost i had. Very happy so far. My lifetime average for 552 miles is 17.3. Not bad

 

 

Sent from my iPad mini using Tapatalk

Edited by dodgehemi0

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 279 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • are there any codes? with lots of rust, perhaps disconnect/clean both sides of the connection/examine cable ends (the wires) for corrosion going into the sheath & replace if necessary/reconnect ALL the power AND ground cables between the battery, engine, frame, cab, fuse box and starter charm.li (website) has a no-start diagnostic procedure you can work through to get it working.
    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...