Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I almost got that same color Sierra instead of the Silverado, looks great.

Thank you very much brother !
Posted

Just to share some of my recent travels

 

37911894-26BA-44E3-A230-3B5DD8B75B42_zps

CD1EC76B-3D55-450D-9864-2F23E8580815_zps

67AB8613-A260-41E2-BBC5-B9B02C975AFE_zps

 

For the flex lovers

5216E5D0-4CC8-41AD-9042-37562DBF443D_zps

 

And for anyone who likes to go camping, CHECK OUT THIS TENT! It's amazing and very spacious!

EC5C6F7A-D0E2-4B86-B43F-C6667AA8E1EF_zps

  • Like 9
Posted

@gmtech117 ... REAL clean truck. I've debated putting mudflaps on so should I paint the fender moldings, I'd HAVE to do painted mudflaps which "eh"... Decisions decisions.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone

Posted

@gmtech117 ... REAL clean truck. I've debated putting mudflaps on so should I paint the fender moldings, I'd HAVE to do painted mudflaps which "eh"... Decisions decisions.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone

Thanks!

 

I'd skip the mudflaps , and get the painted moldings, huge improvement over the cheap "plastic" look.

Posted (edited)

My GMC sierra!

Here is my 2015 Sierra 1500 sle double cab 4x4. 6" pro comp lift with rear pro runner shocks, 35" mickey thompson baja mtz's, havok h101 20x9 wheels. Looking to get the exhaust done next, anyone have any suggestions on what might look good on this truck? looking for more things to add. Thanks!

Edited by John fitzpatrick
  • Like 1
Posted

post-151288-0-84430000-1452124879_thumb.jpg

 

Remove the air dam under the front bumper. Mine came without one because of the Black Widow bumper that came on it. My brother's Black Widow has the stock bumper and he removed the air dam on his. Now you can see more of the Fabtech lift. His is the blue truck on the right.

 

 

post-151288-0-84430000-1452124879_thumb.jpg

post-151288-0-84430000-1452124879_thumb.jpg

post-151288-0-84430000-1452124879_thumb.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted

My 2015 I got a couple weeks ago. I've put a 2in level and 20% on the front side windows. I want to get a set of black full length steps bars and maybe a size bigger on the tires.

post-70720-0-91070500-1452132573_thumb.jpg

post-70720-0-91070500-1452132573_thumb.jpg

post-70720-0-91070500-1452132573_thumb.jpg

post-70720-0-91070500-1452132573_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Picked up this 2015 All Terrain about 2 months ago. Already installed 2.5" RC leveling kit, 275-65-18s. Also 5% tint on fronts and backs with 35% on windshield. So far I love it! Coming from a 600hp+ duramax I was worried I'd feel like this was gutless but it has a fair amount of power. I'll probably be doing some tuning soon though.

 

20160105_121123_zpszgpo21q2.jpg

 

 

20160105_120847_zpssoridxho.jpg

Edited by mille657
  • Like 1
Posted

Here is my 2015 LTZ CC, Deep Ocean Blue, 6.2L, CK156 Aftermarket 22" rims with 305/45/22 Toyo Tires, 2" front lift, 1" in the back. Dee Zee nxt running boards, Access Lorado cover.

 

http://920b4da5d3689678a4116e79a396011f_zpsgopy

 

http://1f3f256fa1c32247425b0e3e7e67ceb9_zpsccw8

 

Dee Zee Running Boards

http://83aa0dad12c41a69a826f29a6aed44a1_zps7wuk

 

Working it, luckily I did not have to go far.

 

http://0fdc15effd9e9baa4999bd69abe89968_zpsvclj

 

Stock rims with lift

 

http://ccd1c2e04c4188b46d100eaac68d754b_zpsmanf

 

http://67242cd06e949fa855d0b7fcfa990845_zps2j0x

 

 

 

  • Like 9
Posted
Here is my 2015 LTZ CC, Deep Ocean Blue, 6.2L, CK156 Aftermarket 22" rims with 305/45/22 Toyo Tires, 2" front lift, 1" in the back. Dee Zee nxt running boards, Access Lorado.

 

When u say 1" in the back did u add an additional inch? Or are u running the factory inch.

 

Truck looks great. I really like the blue.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,646 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...