Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

New guy here, first post! Had a 2004 Chevy for 12 years, 155,000 trouble free miles. Pulled the trigger on this one just last month, Merry Christmas to me, lol!

Love the look of a SC, I can't have one but love the look!

  • 4 months later...
Posted (edited)

Here's my 2014 Sierra SLT 6.2 w/ 6" BDS Fox coil-over lift(front lowered to 4.5" of lift"), Toyo RT 35x12.5 r 20, NFab Stainless nerf bar steps, Corsa Sport exhaust, AFE momentum GT intake, Katzkin interior full leather no vinyl, color matched emblems, retrofitted 2016 LED headlights and taillights, Rigid D series fog lights.

 

FullSizeRender

FullSizeRender

FullSizeRender (1)

IMG 3142

Edited by Payton34
Posted

Truck is supposed to be ready today, they just have to install the towing mirrors, tonneau cover and change the chrome mudflaps to black chrome, So far they have installed the Anzo LED tail lights, Weathertech floor mats and KMC Wheels, I will get some better shots when I have her but here's one for now.

 

34500601856_9a2d964c26_o.jpg

Love the tail lights [emoji7]

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

Too Many Mods 2 Name...

e46242036527f0515b6eb63f583d1d03.jpeg8d670257c5e54e5ea4ad9ac9453a6a2b.jpgecc453a350f86989765d80140207df2e.jpgd1e18c5bc60f98c1af53a65360de5eaf.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by XpensiveChevy
  • Like 2
Posted

Second to top picture is awesome looking. I think because it's the only one without "expensive" in the pic. I would like that side image but to hard to actually see the paint around wheel wells with the hdr effect and overexposure look someone added. I'm sure you get heads turning daily. Nice truck

Posted

Second to top picture is awesome looking. I think because it's the only one without "expensive" in the pic. I would like that side image but to hard to actually see the paint around wheel wells with the hdr effect and overexposure look someone added. I'm sure you get heads turning daily. Nice truck

Thx 3LabDesigns.... Sorry u don’t like the word Xpensive... I will make sure every pic has it moving forward... Lol... Btw the overexposure is called a Canon T7i, “Xpensive Habitz” is my lifestyle and I rep my brothers of Xpensive Habitz Auto Club...

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Happy 1 year birthday to my silver ice! [emoji512]

1e274a467984f6b2485e221f48c66bc0.jpg

5750a9b552ab3d6250bbfdf3993f2154.jpg

d0e7b9642501a26183c871d8f5dc4f9e.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...