Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

Kind of not tracking with your post. The only opening in the front of my truck that allows air to circulate is the honeycomb grill, no other opening and the truck does not buffet. There is no cutout unless you happen to have tow hooks

 

 

That was Gen 3, the opening in the bumper was for exposed tow hooks and an opening for circular fog lights, don't think the engineers intended those openings for air flow.

 

 

 

Hey Zip, while driving I notice the previous generation and the generation before all had openings in the front bumper in addition even the Ford Expedition and Navigator's have opening in the bumper. GM may not have been aware when making these vehicle a small design cue could cause such an issue.

Posted

My XL Denali has been in the shop since last Thursday, a week ago, for the vibration issues. This is the 3rd time it's been in the shop since I took delivery on 9/15/15. Went through the road force balancing dance and had two tires replaced. Fixed the vibration - temporarily. This past service visit has been frustrating as they didn't even drive the truck for the first 7 days it was there (I put an obd GPS device in it). They drove it Friday and initially said they didn't feel it. An hour later they claim to "have narrowed it down to the driveline." He said they were going to put a picoscope on it and see what that shows. Rhetorically, I asked him what the picoscope measured. He paused, put me on hold and clearly asked someone and came back on to tell me that it's a tool to measure vibration. Serious question - should a service manager know what a picoscope is?

 

He also told me that the smaller non-XL's were less prone to the vibration and buffeting and they'd entertain moving me to one of those if my truck can't be fixed. I'd actually consider that but only if I know for a fact that it doesn't have either issue.

 

Are there ANY trucks that DONT have these issues? Is it possible to get a truck that is as expected.

Posted

...while driving I notice the previous generation and the generation before all had openings in the front bumper in addition even the Ford Expedition and Navigator's have opening in the bumper. GM may not have been aware when making these vehicle a small design cue could cause such an issue.

Maybe I'm not understanding what you mean by openings, but went outside and looked before I made that post, no vents at least on the Chevys. No matter, air vents are designed to cool an engine or release heat from the engine bay, if enough air got past the block I don't think it would result in buffeting in the cabin. But I won't discount it cause at this point all customers and dealers are just guessing. However, I don't believe the manufacturer is completely clueless of what's going on, I think they are hoping a bandaid will work until the Gen 5 hits the street. A bandaid will not work, if there is nothing wrong with the part they are replacing by using the exact same part, the result shouldn't change anything.

Posted

He also told me that the smaller non-XL's were less prone to the vibration and buffeting and they'd entertain moving me to one of those if my truck can't be fixed. I'd actually consider that but only if I know for a fact that it doesn't have either issue.

 

Are there ANY trucks that DONT have these issues? Is it possible to get a truck that is as expected.

Being on the thread since page 1 and reading every page, I have also come to the same conclusion as your dealer on the standard size being "less" prone to the issues. I made a post on here somewhere that talked about it.

 

To answer your last question, yes. If you were near California Central Coast I would take you for a spin, my truck doesn't have any issues associated with this thread (buffeting, pressure, shaking, vibration). But I do believe all these trucks are in theory the same, it's just some things (length, interior volume, tire, wheels, engine/body mounting points, etc) that determine whether a customer experience the issue.

Posted

Has anyone had them use the picoscope on their vehicle

 

He said they were going to put a picoscope on it and see what that shows. Rhetorically, I asked him what the picoscope measured.

As a customer, don't need a picoscope to tell me about a vibration. Ok, the dealer determine there is a vibration, what's next. Still don't know the cause to come with a solution to stop it?

Posted

Went through the road force balancing dance and had two tires replaced. Fixed the vibration - temporarily.

This is exactly what happens when you replace two tires with the same tires, a temporary fix. To eliminate the tires, you need to replace them with a different suppliers tires. Then if it continues to happen, you have to replace the wheel with a different manufacturers wheel. Once you do that you can eliminate the tire and wheel causing the vibration. But to replace them (if not a defect) with the same tire, expect to remain at square 1.

Posted (edited)

...they claim to "have narrowed it down to the driveline."

There are a lot of components in the driveline. The dealer should have found faulty parts, mating points off, parts not torqued to specs prior to making the claim of narrowing the issue to the driveline. If not, what led them to the driveline?

Edited by The Zip
Posted

The fact you have a vibration is one matter. Determining the source, or fault, which causes the vibration is one of the many diagnostic functions of a picoscope.


The fact you have a vibration is one matter. Determining the source, or fault, which causes the vibration is one of the many diagnostic functions of a picoscope.

Posted

As a customer, don't need a picoscope to tell me about a vibration. Ok, the dealer determine there is a vibration, what's next. Still don't know the cause to come with a solution to stop it?

As a customer, don't need a picoscope to tell me about a vibration. Ok, the dealer determine there is a vibration, what's next. Still don't know the cause to come with a solution to stop it?

They use the picoscope to narrow down and locate the cause of the vibration. Might be the first time your dealer used this since they probably never had to deal with this before so they might be coached in the process. I think someone ended up having the driveshaft replaced and parts in the rear end replaced and adjusted to a different spec internally (rearend) which solved the problem

Posted (edited)

Given what was recently posted on the facebook page (someone claims to have a video showing roof flexion when the buffeting occurs with their suburban) stating the sheet metal is too thin and needs additional support, I decided to do a quick little experiment.

 

I loaded two pieces of luggage (approx 35-40lbs ea) and positioned them between each cross rail and strapped them directly on the roof in an attempt to limit the amount of roof deflection. I then picked a newly paved stretch of road and hit continuous speeds of 30-55mph...The buffeting was still present but it was greatly reduced and the overall sound/feel was very different which tells me the roof plays a big part in the problem. However, I am not sure if it's the direct cause. As it has been mentioned many times in this thread, the suspension and driveline vibrations may be the culprit and the cabin is essentially one big tin can enhancing noises/vibrations that resonate thus creating the buffeting. Who knows? I may attempt this again after I have the dealer swap out the 22s with factory 20" wheels to see if there's any change as the 22s definitely do not help the issue.

 

My dealer is telling me that they will have a GM engineer onsite this week (for another reason) and would like to have me drop the truck off and have him drive /inspect. I've told the dealer as well as the GM Sr. adviser that I don't want to have the TSBs done as they have yet to prove it fixes anything. Given what everyone else has experienced with GM, I am not expecting much, if anything, but it's worth a try.

 

I drove a 15i subrban ltz (sunroof, 20", no cross rails) with approx 35k miles on it and I noticed the buffeting to some degree but it was hardly noticeable compared to my yukon. ...such a mystery...

 

 

never thought I'd have to do something like this or even deal with such an issue in 2015...I can go drive a new very raw hollow base delivery van and not experience such issues.

Edited by ajs800
Posted

I think it's safe to say that no one in this thread has had the dealer inspect with the picoscope we need a thread with the owners who have had the dealer inspect with the picoscope

Posted

I think it's safe to say that no one in this thread has had the dealer inspect with the picoscope we need a thread with the owners who have had the dealer inspect with the picoscope

The picoscope was used quite extensively on my Denali. Watched the GM engineer take it out of his vehicle and put a laptop and the pico in mine.

Posted

The picoscope was used quite extensively on my Denali. Watched the GM engineer take it out of his vehicle and put a laptop and the pico in mine.

Any successful results on yours with it?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2018 Silverado Custom with 156k on the odometer. In the last month I've replaced the plugs, wires and the driver side engine mount. My wife just returned from a trip of about 1500 miles and told me the brakes are making a grinding noise when applied. I drove it and looked it over and this is what I found with the driver's side rear rotor.   I'm going to order new pads and check about having the rotor resurfaced. Hopefully this is easier than the last 2 jobs.   Peace  
    • Any update if the new valve cover help with the oil consumption?  I have a 2014 GMC sierra and my truck is consuming a lot of oil so I’m wondering if replacing the driver side valve cover will stop some of the oil consumption. Thanks 
    • I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
    • At peak temperature.  They get to cool down and warm up more, especially those with the external cooler.  I have three GMT900s and one of them has over 225K on its original transmission.  Fluid gets changed about every 36K miles, all of it.     It's not the bean counters, it was the government.  They had to meet CAFE standards and other government requirements.   To get around that, we tune them and modify them to our liking.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...