Jump to content

Leveling kit


Recommended Posts

Posted

Just crank the T- Bars about 4 turns in.

 

Jack the front wheels off the ground first then crank the adjuster bolts in about 4 even turns on both left and right side, that will raise it about 1.5 to 2" in the front. No need to buy a leveling kit.

Posted

Just crank the T- Bars about 4 turns in.

 

Jack the front wheels off the ground first then crank the adjuster bolts in about 4 even turns on both left and right side, that will raise it about 1.5 to 2" in the front. No need to buy a leveling kit.

 

^^^ What he said. No need to spend the money on a leveling kit on these trucks, if you're only wanting to raise the front a couple inches. Yes, it will ride a bit more stiff than stock, but the 'leveling kits' do the same thing (no matter what they advertise). Leveling kits for these trucks just consist of re-indexed torsion bar keys, that put more twist on the torsion bars without having to turn the bolt in farther. People think it's better, because you're not cranking the bolts in farther, but the end result is the same. 4-5 turns on the stock bolts should give you the lift you're after.

Posted

I have had to put leveling kits in my last two 2500HD's. The reason being that on the last two, on one side or the other there has been not enough bolt sticking out to adjust up at all. On the truck I have now (2011) there was less then 1/2" of bolt sticking out - I would not have gotten enough height out of it to make a difference. When they set the ride height, sometime it takes more adjustment on one side than the other. I'm not sure how often this is the case, but you might want to get under the truck and look to see how much adjustment you have before you write off a leveling kit. Who knows, maybe I just have bad luck!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I'm suborn like that Ed. There's a plaque in my doctor office that says, "Don't quit, take a break." Works for allot of things.    Reality is, the wife loves her SUV and even given it's issues, she'd buy another if she found one with low enough miles. Then again she has me to maintain it.    Most of what ails this thing is GM shooting themselves in the foot and by extension the buyer. Besides a ridiculous breather system the cat warm up strategy, IMHO, is the dumbest thing I've ever seen an OEM do to a vehicle they warranty. On cold start it r-e-t-a-r-d-s the ignition to like -17* ATDC and dump fuel like kicking over a pail to force combustion in the CAT's for rapid warm up. This literally hoses the oil off cylinder walls and creates enough varnish precursors to stick rings in even well maintained engines. THEN if that wasn't bad enough they recommend using a wanting fluid specification at equally stupid interval.    Common to all GDI motors I'm aware of is this silly practice of driving the HPFP off the cam giving a leaking pump direct and unchecked access to the crankcase. And sir, eventually the ALL leak. Your job is to "catch it if you can". Yes, these are the same people that removed dipsticks from engines and transmissions in belief Joe Average wasn't capable of checking, reading and maintain his own vehicles fluids. Sadly  and in large they were correct. Most people these days can't tell a sparkplug from a fire plug.  Great ideas one and all.    Every move and every error calculated to defend themselves from the law and their own customers.       
    • Most online suppliers and Amazon. All have noted "not for use with Bose speakers".
    • Very interesting thread. Definitely didn’t expect to see this kind of mileage out of that engine. 
    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...