Jump to content

5.3 vs 6.2 mpg


mikern

Recommended Posts

Posted

i am no mechanic but with the 6.2 having more hp/trq, would it not hold four cylinders better

than the 5.3 with both trucks being equal

 

mike

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Wife's truck 2014 with 5.3l and 3.08 gears 25 mpg

My truck 2014 6.2l and 3.42 gears 23 mpg.

 

We only did one test.

Posted

I've got a 6.2L, 3.42 gears, stock tires, leveling kit.

I'm at 6800 miles so far - 14mpg city / 20mpg highway

 

I've also noticed it goes into V4 drastically more often when using tow/haul mode, weather I'm hauling anything or not.

Posted

I get 23 mpg in my 6.2 with a super charger. personally I don't see any benefit to getting the 5.3 other than if you simply don't want to spend the extra money.

Posted

I get 23 mpg in my 6.2 with a super charger. personally I don't see any benefit to getting the 5.3 other than if you simply don't want to spend the extra money.

Well Ill answer that, when I got mine the Texas package out the door was 31K loaded pretty good. The 5.3 on corn is 380 HP. The left over Denali I was looking at was 15K more. AS loaded as the Texas package is its hard to justify for the differents in HP. That with supercharging in mind is a fifty HP differents, according to the web sites between the two and is paid for by buying the 5.3 and then some. If it was just a 2500$ upgrade on the Texas package I would have bought it.
Posted

+1... using people's mileages in the forums is kind of useless unless they are located in the same region as you with same conditions and truck model. I live in Florida and CT during the year... just got back from my first stay in FL with the truck and was literally averaging 4 MPG more down there compared to the hilly stop & go conditions up here in CT.

Posted

Fuelly is a good site to check. You can view different configurations and engines and see their mileage... It will only get better as more and more fuel ups are recorded.

 

The govt site is BS.

Posted

but no one has really answered the question

with all things being equal would the 6.2 not hold 4 cylinders longer

with more hp/trq

 

mike

Posted

It goes into 4v based off yr throttle position, speed, and rpm so too answer yr question it should be the same

Posted

one more time

when the 6.2 is in four cyclinders would it not hold it longer than the 5.3 with matching axle ratio's

since it would have more hp/trq in four

 

mike

Posted

I reset my Trip A with every fuel up. I usually see mileage between 16-18.

 

My Trip B I haven't ever reset. That average shows 16.6mpg. And I also track my MPG with fuely, which shows me 16.5 mph since I've had it.

 

5.3, 3.42 gears. 10868 miles

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I reset my Trip A with every fuel up. I usually see mileage between 16-18.

 

My Trip B I haven't ever reset. That average shows 16.6mpg. And I also track my MPG with fuely, which shows me 16.5 mph since I've had it.

 

5.3, 3.42 gears. 10868 miles

 

 

I average 15.5 with a best of 17.8 on 91 octane. Just over 11,000 miles

 

My Mod list:

3.42 gears 5.3L

6" fabtech lift

400lbs total: (22" toyo open country mud terrain and 22x11 fuel hostage wheels)

AFE Momentum GT intake

AFE Exhaust

Chucks Custom Tuning Tune ( Houston, Tx )

 

 

These posts make me feel real good about my mileage. I also have about a 50/50 mix on city/hwy driving conditions.

Posted

 

 

I average 15.5 with a best of 17.8 on 91 octane. Just over 11,000 miles

 

My Mod list:

3.42 gears 5.3L

6" fabtech lift

400lbs total: (22" toyo open country mud terrain and 22x11 fuel hostage wheels)

AFE Momentum GT intake

AFE Exhaust

Chucks Custom Tuning Tune ( Houston, Tx )

 

 

These posts make me feel real good about my mileage. I also have about a 50/50 mix on city/hwy driving conditions.

 

Pretty good for a lifted truck. I'd say my driving is about 80 city/20 hwy

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,978
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    rayredbone
    Newest Member
    rayredbone
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 501 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...