Jump to content

GMC lowered towing rating on my 2014 Sierra?

JumpMaster82d

By JumpMaster82d
in Troubleshooting & Recalls

Recommended Posts

melito74 New Member

melito74

Posted
Posted

Update.

 

I wasn't getting much cooperation from GM, so I filed a complaint using the Better Business Bureau Autoline, and stated my issues and what I wanted and cited Florida Lemon Law statutes. It qualifies because of a condition that limits the intended purposes of my purchase which for whatever reason they can't fix. I'm over my GCWR by 200 lbs with my travel trailer since they changed the towing capacity (lowered GCWR by 800 lbs in September) via a recal letter.

 

I mentioned that my truck did overheat during a trip this summer, which I documented from my dealer visit when it happened. I had a weight slip from a Cat scale (loaded for a trip), along with pictures of my rig loaded, model information, picture of VIN and weight rating of TT, registration, insurance info, etc.

 

I settled for 105% of sticker price with GM paying for all my aftermarket purchases (window tint, tonneau, etc) while I chip in for the use of the vehicle by Florida Lemon Law standards (sale price from purchase contract X miles driven all divided by 120,000).

 

I submitted every receipt and document online and it was resolved quickly. Tomorrow I go pick up my new 2015 Sierra 2500 Diesel and move on with my life.

 

I bought the max tow 5.3l, 3.73 gear knowing full well what I wanted it for and the safety margins. Had I known they were going to do this to me, I would've sprung for the 2500 from the get go. I've been kicking myself, but now I'm not going to worry about anything.

 

I highly recommend familiarizing yourself with your state lemon laws, and get the BBB involved if your having difficulty. They seem to get your case to the right people quickly. I talked to my arbitrator today and couldn't thank her enough.

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply
AnthonyCL New Member

AnthonyCL

Posted
Posted

My 2014 GMC Sierra 1500 Crew Cab, Standard Box, 5.3L V8 2WD with a 3.08 axle states in the owners manual that I can tow 8,400 pounds. I have the trailer package included standard, not the max trailering but I had an electronic brake controller installed. Is this different? I didn't receive any letter.

SouthernSilveradoGuy85 Senior Enthusiast

SouthernSilveradoGuy85

Posted
Posted

My 2014 GMC Sierra 1500 Crew Cab, Standard Box, 5.3L V8 2WD with a 3.08 axle states in the owners manual that I can tow 8,400 pounds. I have the trailer package included standard, not the max trailering but I had an electronic brake controller installed. Is this different? I didn't receive any letter.

 

Your manual must be the outdated one without the towing updates. My manual says your truck can only tow 6,700. Trailering package is in a sense just the hitch and trailer wiring, could be more but none of it allows more towing weight, just that it's equipped to tow. Also adding a trailer brake doesn't allow the truck to tow more, just to give a trailer with brakes the braking power for better stability and stopping.

 

Here's a link to the manual, I downloaded to my computer and phone in case I need to look something up and so I dont' have to go out tot he truck just to look up something:

 

http://www.chevrolet.com/content/dam/Chevrolet/northamerica/usa/nscwebsite/en/Home/Ownership/Manuals%20and%20Videos/02_pdf/2014-silverado-1500-owners-manual.pdf

AnthonyCL New Member

AnthonyCL

Posted
Posted

I feel that the towing capacity in my printed owners manual trumps any change that was made to their online manuals and if I drive within those parameters and it faults, GM will have to cover any damages in accordance with my warranty. In the eyes of the legal system this is how it would work, sending a letter to me notifying me of a change would need to offer the option to return the truck or compensate me for potential damages. I have yet to receive this letter, I purchased the truck new at the dealership less then 4 months ago. Nothing is in my paperwork stating a change to this. If I want to tow a trailer that is under my manuals specified max of 8,400 pounds, I am within all guidelines. So in the sake of not trying to argue with you, I see the updated owner manual online, I just don't accept that change as it grossly affects my usage of the $50,000 truck I purchased. I'd hope no one else on here is willing to accept that either.

AnthonyCL New Member

AnthonyCL

Posted
Posted

 

Your manual must be the outdated one without the towing updates. My manual says your truck can only tow 6,700. Trailering package is in a sense just the hitch and trailer wiring, could be more but none of it allows more towing weight, just that it's equipped to tow. Also adding a trailer brake doesn't allow the truck to tow more, just to give a trailer with brakes the braking power for better stability and stopping.

 

Here's a link to the manual, I downloaded to my computer and phone in case I need to look something up and so I dont' have to go out tot he truck just to look up something:

 

http://www.chevrolet.com/content/dam/Chevrolet/northamerica/usa/nscwebsite/en/Home/Ownership/Manuals%20and%20Videos/02_pdf/2014-silverado-1500-owners-manual.pdf

 

In fact, my manual is still available and linked on the GMC website:

 

http://www.gmc.com/content/dam/GMC/global/master/nscwebsite/en/home/Owners/Manuals/01_Images/2014-GMC-Sierra-1500-Owner-Manual.pdf

 

It clearly states my towing capacity is 8,700 pounds. Correction for the 8,400 my manual says 8,700. So what is going on?

14SLTZ71 Enthusiast

14SLTZ71

Posted
Posted

So in the sake of not trying to argue with you, I see the updated owner manual online, I just don't accept that change as it grossly affects my usage of the $50,000 truck I purchased. I'd hope no one else on here is willing to accept that either.

I don't think anybody has said that they are willing to accept it. Most people are asking for some sort of compensation mostly in the form of a buyback or trade in assistance. If you have the 5.3L 3:08 gears your tow rating changed, nobody needs to convince you of that, you can find out first hand by calling GM and asking.

There are two versions of the manual, the latest one has been corrected with the appropriate tow ratings.

 

Edit: well now I guess there are 3 versions (printings).

SouthernSilveradoGuy85 Senior Enthusiast

SouthernSilveradoGuy85

Posted
Posted

 

In fact, my manual is still available and linked on the GMC website:

 

http://www.gmc.com/content/dam/GMC/global/master/nscwebsite/en/home/Owners/Manuals/01_Images/2014-GMC-Sierra-1500-Owner-Manual.pdf

 

It clearly states my towing capacity is 8,700 pounds. Correction for the 8,400 my manual says 8,700. So what is going on?

 

The one you're looking at is still outdated. Go to the 1st page that says introduction (page iii). On the bottom left it says 1st printing, that's the old one. This is the link to the updated one for GMC and this one says 3rd printing which says 6,700.

 

http://www.gmc.com/content/dam/GMC/global/master/nscwebsite/en/home/Owners/Manuals/01_Images/2014-sierra-1500-owners-manual.pdf

  • 2 weeks later...
EXSlider400 Senior Enthusiast

EXSlider400

Posted
Posted

 

What a bunch of jerks. Ill-informed jerks at that! It doesn't matter because he can't tow more than 6500 without going over his GVWR anyway? Somebody needs to buy these guys a calculator.

That is why I canceled my account and un-joined the site. I did take a pics of the stickers they were wanting (from both trucks), but after they were so rude I never posted them. But here they are is for anyone on here. Nothing on them were different.

post-42817-0-97188700-1414426542_thumb.jpg

post-42817-0-54935300-1414426631_thumb.jpg

post-42817-0-97188700-1414426542_thumb.jpg

post-42817-0-54935300-1414426631_thumb.jpg

post-42817-0-97188700-1414426542_thumb.jpg

post-42817-0-54935300-1414426631_thumb.jpg

post-42817-0-97188700-1414426542_thumb.jpg

post-42817-0-54935300-1414426631_thumb.jpg

  • 3 months later...
2014gmcserria New Member

2014gmcserria

Posted
Posted

I also have the 3:08 gear ratio and have been dealing with the dealer and GM for 3 months now. At first it seemed like it was going to be a easy trade to the 3:42s but they told me they could not just change the gears as there is much more involved with these newer tech trucks. My first offer from GM was going to cost me $17,000can for a mistake, that I didn't make. I told the salesman when I was buying the truck I needed a towing cap around the 7500-8000lb make for my camper trailer.

2014gmcserria New Member

2014gmcserria

Posted
Posted

I'm not sure the dealership really knows how to fix this either, I think they should talk to an expert of some sort, it's pretty much beyond what a sales rep on average knows about the vehicle I think (not saying all, but I know some people don't need a huge amount o vehicle knowledge like this to get into car sales)

I think they are throwing you some BS trying to get you to buy a truck with a bigger profit margin to recoup some of the money they are going to lose over this towing recall

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Jake87
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jake87 · Posted

      I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • Jake87
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Jake87 · Posted

      AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • NDKoze
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By NDKoze · Posted

      If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...