Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Be sure to do so. Get the 7000mt :) I just want to see how high they lift it.

No I agree it's not going to be that big of a difference. Just simply stating what I had read.

As to my comment about fox or king I was just conveying that I wasn't touting Bilstein as the end all be all. I and many others simply have heard more positives about them than rancho. They're obviously not comparable to a fox, king, icon, coil over.

I would like to try dirt logic coil overs or a 4" fabtech lift way down the road. It's about 2000-3000 for a 2" fabtech lift with coilovers or a 4".

The thing about the 7000mt is that they don't come with new coils, which is part of the reason I want the 9000xl. To me the 7000 sounds like its comparable to the 5100's.

 

If I had the money I would definitely get something nicer, a long travel kit would be awesome.

Edited by projectsummit
Posted

I think the 7000mt is a direct competitor to the 5100. I almost went with them but couldn't find any info about them. I know they listed to fit my truck but couldn't find how much they would lift it.

 

Long travel suspension would be ideal. Just costly, but it would be epic.

Posted

Drove a little more this morning, about 10 miles or so. I took the truck to my local shop for an alignment.

 

I was driving pretty cautiously, carefully listing for clunks and the like (didn't hear anything). From what I can tell, the truck seems overall a lot better planted on the road. Rides nice on smooth roads and handles the bigger bumps and crappy roads A LOT better. I am definitly happy with the install.

  • Like 2
Posted

anyone add 5100 with leveling kit combo?

 

Not a good idea of stacking leveling kits.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I have to say i love these shocks. Granted i never did this with my Ranchos, but then again they were so bouncy i wouldn't have tried it. I was going down one of our turn roads at 40+ yesterday hitting bumps just to see how it would handle. It was impressive most bumps that would have me starting a vibrating bounce in the ranchos, the bilsteins floated over. The larger bumps are still there of course, it's not a coilover or med-long travel suspension setup but there isn't much jarring or displacement inside the cab. Color me a Bilstein fan. If they ever come out with a true coilover with remote res for 600$ a piece i'll be on it lol. I think years from now i am going to put a Bajakit long travel suspension kit on my truck and some more engine upgrades. Do i race? Nope. I'm just a suspension whore, would love to have that capability.

 

Really need to get a camera. It was beautiful yesterday on the farm and could've had some very nice pics if i wasn't stuck with a dad gum phone camera.

IMG_1524_zpsiyp3duyx.jpgIMG_1525_zpsibyhysa0.jpg

Edited by 5RWill
  • Like 3
Posted

 

 

I'm just a suspension whore, would love to have that capability.

 

 

I had to laugh at this....only because I know what you are saying. I am starting down that path a$ well.

  • Like 1
Posted

well I put them all on.. was a piece a cake.. the front went up around an 1.5 inchs not far enought for me.. but the ride is nice.. a little firmer.. seems to stick to the road better now.. handles turns better.. I think i will add a slight body lift to get the rest of the lift i want.. :)

Posted

Pics redbeast? I know some still look like they have a lot of rake. A particular member with a chevy still looked like he had over an inch of rake. I have about 1-1.3" of rake. Which is perfect to me. Looks pretty much level and i can still tow when i need too.

Posted

I was going over my front suspension over the weekend. Now that I have a couple hundred miles on the new shocks I wanted to go back and give the stuff I undid another torquing. Just to make sure everything is tight.

 

I went to check the torque on the tighten the center strut hat nut, but it basically just spins the threads along with it. The spec is 35 ft/lbs, which isn't exactly a whole lot. But I probably have about 4-5 threads showing on each strut hat nut. Is this normal? Can anyone else comment on the "tightness" of their strut hat nuts.

 

If you are wondering what nut I am talking about it is that center nut shown below, except now everything is installed on the truck and I was trying to check the torque on it.


a47ec90ff5230b3d9a7123709ae1c9f0.jpg

Posted

I'll try and look at mine tomorrow. Though i had the dealer do it, i'm not sure what they torqued them to. 35ft-lbs isn't much at all with no thread locking compound. I torque scope rings and actions screws more than that.

Posted (edited)

You will need to use two wrenches one thats offset to get down in the groove to tighten it down and one to hold the strut from spinning. They should be tightened down all the way with no threads showing.

Edited by projectsummit
Posted

You will need to use two wrenches one thats offset to get down in the groove to tighten it down and one to hold the strut from spinning. They should be tightened down all the way with no threads showing.

 

Well there has to be threads showing...when the nut tightens down it exposes more and more of the thread coming thru the strut hat.

 

The way I tightened mine off the truck, was with two wrenches. One holding the threads on the grooved part and another turning the nut. While I had the coil spring compressed, i tightened the nut down as much as I could by hand. But still am not able to actually "torque" it because of the way the strut is designed, You have to hold the grooved part, and that blocks a torque wrench from getting on.

 

All I am looking for is for people to post pics of what the top threads look like on their installed setups.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Length/amount of data capture will be important to consider, sifting through 5 minutes of a data log can be enormous when it is stored in milliseconds. Being able to find the 'event' let alone decipher it.   Presumably the driver would notice something and hit a button to capture the 'window' of data. That window has to be large enough for the operator to recognize the event and react accordingly.    The data has to be able to be retrieved easily.   The data has to be able to be understood. Which is the biggest challenge, dealer techs won't even know what most of it is and would likely not even look at it if an owner brought it to them. Meaning the owner, the least educated/qualified, trying to understand it.    How will the data be presented? Could specific PIDs be selected and a timelapse graph be watched? How will a specific value be noted as abnormal? Additionally, a good data logger would be able to 'learn' normal values for a specific vehicle and flag abnormalities automatically. It could in theory watch parameters degrade over time and suggest maintenance as needed. (If the MAF reading begins tapering off for a given set of other readings - MAP, throttle position, Ambient, etc.. a flag to check air filter.) With the amount of data available, a device (really the vehicle rather than an additional accessory) should be able to do more than issue a DTC. It should be able to run the full diagnostic suite automatically and present a solution rather than a code. (It's not the 90's anymore). The technology is available for the vehicle to not just say "P0087", it should know low fuel pressure, check other PIDs to narrow down the problem itself, and determine if it is a lift pump, high pressure pump, regulator, leak in the fuel line, clogged filter, etc. Even if it can't narrow it down, it should be able to guide the user to the likely problems.   This would be a major problem for dealer service departments, which are the manufacturers customers it is in their collective best interest to NOT have this available to the consumer.   Further, if the owner is going to be the primary consumer of the data, it's got to be at a consumer price point vs. dealer only specialty tool price.   This group is more 'involved' in their vehicle than general public/consumer and will have knowledge, experience, needs and desires that are quite different from the market at large.   
    • I put the prof up. If you read what I posted. You can see that housing, cars and income are in line with the era we were talking about. It’s harder in some places easier in others. Let’s agree to disagree and put this back on track, OK? We both are pretty stubborn and hard headed. But I bring receipts. If you wish I will not respond to you in the future. 
    • Lets see if I can sum up two pages of nothing useful.    You want to refute your own governments data of the "Purchasing Power" Index FOR THE ENTIRE USA and its territories replacing it with the experience of a single family and its business and label that reality?  Then pound on that for a week hoping it will find traction?    Stan, I've told you several times. I don't do irrational. There are more people in the USA than your family.    I'm pretty sure this tread is so blown up. I'll give you a few days or months if need be to post yourself silent then I'll see if I can find enough parts of the train to reassemble it. 
    • Facebook groups hate VSE, poor customer service; their responses to criticisms are pretty poor for a reputable company. I'm not a customer, haven't bought anything from them, but how they handle themselves on social media is a definite "No" for me. 
    • $10,000 for a transmission?   Pretty sure I could buy all the parts, tools, and education to rebuild it myself for a quarter of that amount.   or swap it out with a new one...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...