Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

How does it tow? I want to do a lift and people warned me about how bad it would tow. Looks like you have my mother in law in the back. (Justnkidding)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It tows well. It towed it home just fine. It was wandering between 4th and 5th around 65mph. I have 37s and with the 3.73 it’s terrible. Once I go to 4.88 it will be much better. It was actually very stable. I towed it home about 4 hours without stabilizer hitch and sway bars. And with semis blowing by it barely moved the truck. I tow with my truck a lot. Car trailers loaded down, utility trailer with atvs and stuff. Never had an issue. Once the gears get done, it will tow a lot better. I’m on 7.5 inch lift, 37s and 20x14 wheels.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

It tows well. It towed it home just fine. It was wandering between 4th and 5th around 65mph. I have 37s and with the 3.73 it’s terrible. Once I go to 4.88 it will be much better. It was actually very stable. I towed it home about 4 hours without stabilizer hitch and sway bars. And with semis blowing by it barely moved the truck. I tow with my truck a lot. Car trailers loaded down, utility trailer with atvs and stuff. Never had an issue. Once the gears get done, it will tow a lot better. I’m on 7.5 inch lift, 37s and 20x14 wheels.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have a 2017 L5P. I’m not sure of the gearing. I really don’t want to make it a bad experience. I rub with my my 35’s. I’m only looking to go up 4-5 inches (which is probably 2-3 more in the front.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

You have a diesel, so tow wise totally different animal. If you lift it and keep the same size tires, it won’t tow any different than it does now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
On 6/27/2018 at 4:36 AM, b-garage said:

Sorry, I do not, and I do not own this truck any more. Being on the factory wheels the tires were pretty much flush with the body.

What did you think of those Kanati Mug Hogs? I just put a set of 285/70 17's on my 2008 FJ Cruiser and thinking about getting some 295/70 17's for my 2015 2500HD. So far so good on my FJ, but curious how they'll do on a bigger heavier vehicle like my truck. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Gear_Jammer said:

What did you think of those Kanati Mug Hogs? I just put a set of 285/70 17's on my 2008 FJ Cruiser and thinking about getting some 295/70 17's for my 2015 2500HD. So far so good on my FJ, but curious how they'll do on a bigger heavier vehicle like my truck. 

I can’t  say a whole lot. I only had them on my truck for about 10k miles. They were a little noisy, not as loud as others I have heard going down the highway though. Didn’t have a chance to try them off-road either. I raised the front by cranking on the torsion keys. It rode like crap with the stock tires on it like that. When I put the Kanatis on they did seem to soften the ride quite a bit. For 10k miles, they did not seem to be wearing out fast either.

 

I liked them well enough that I bought 7 more to put on my Dually that I traded the black truck for. I had to go with the next smaller size, but I am really impressed with he ride quality on the new 3500. And I cranked the torsion bars on it as well. Only have about 1500 miles on the Dually so far.

Posted
12 hours ago, Gear_Jammer said:

What did you think of those Kanati Mug Hogs? I just put a set of 285/70 17's on my 2008 FJ Cruiser and thinking about getting some 295/70 17's for my 2015 2500HD. So far so good on my FJ, but curious how they'll do on a bigger heavier vehicle like my truck. 

I daily drive my hd on a set of those tires and they will need replacement in less than a year.  Otherwise performance is fine 

Posted (edited)

I am new to the Diesel 2500 scene so here area couple pics of my 2016. I have installed a bed liner, leveled the front end 1.5 inches, bug deflector, bed cover and nerfbars. I will do a delete when the warranty is up as it only has 27,000 miles on it. Oh ya going to install 285/70/18 tires soon. Need something a little more aggressive. 

hd 2.JPG

2016 HD.JPG

Edited by 426power
Posted (edited)

heres mine! love this truck. Came from a 10" lifted 1500 2014 silverado. So glad I went with a 2500 this time around.

2500.jpg

 

 

Edited by jerseytaylor
Posted
Very nice upgrade! What's the lift/wheel/tire setup?


I just took a look at it, it has Zone Off-road upper control arms and front shocks, (didn’t see level kit/torsion keys) Fuel Boost 18” wheels and Toyo open country 35x12.5 a/t’s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Sold my 14 Sierra 1500 and replaced with this 15 2500. The headlights and taillights I kept from my 1500. They are 17 1500 Denali lights.  Also if anyone is interested in the white fender molding/trim PM me. I plan on selling or trading it for the standard black

 

mTtnvkY.jpg

 

fQUYKQc.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

gQaBG09.jpg

 

Edited by zmnypit
  • Like 1
Posted
On 6/7/2018 at 10:56 PM, m5guy said:

IMG_0757.JPG

IMG_0738.JPG

Nice.  Looks exactly like the truck I bought over the weekend except mine will be pulling a 15,000lb, 40' toyhauler.

Posted

I've been on this forum for a while, so I guess it's time I posted a few pics of my 2015 2500HD. Nothing special, but I like it.5b5426088937e_Frontpass.thumb.jpg.1b6eb40055b93282b9710d49474d491a.jpg

 

5b5425f541761_Frontdriver.thumb.jpg.d64a7227ea500f8174f73ab309ce30fd.jpgFront.thumb.jpg.9fca6f85c9aa54e6638746e202b7497a.jpg5b5426760c44c_Rearpass.thumb.jpg.e836a639bf8e6ae5c591c976bb1b15ba.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
I've been on this forum for a while, so I guess it's time I posted a few pics of my 2015 2500HD. Nothing special, but I like it.5b5426088937e_Frontpass.thumb.jpg.1b6eb40055b93282b9710d49474d491a.jpg
 
5b5425f541761_Frontdriver.thumb.jpg.d64a7227ea500f8174f73ab309ce30fd.jpgFront.thumb.jpg.9fca6f85c9aa54e6638746e202b7497a.jpg5b5426760c44c_Rearpass.thumb.jpg.e836a639bf8e6ae5c591c976bb1b15ba.jpg

It’s all about if you like it not if anyone else does. Nice clean looking truck, tires are a nice upgrade from stock. What is road noise like on these?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
3 hours ago, iyoung7089 said:


It’s all about if you like it not if anyone else does. Nice clean looking truck, tires are a nice upgrade from stock. What is road noise like on these?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I just got them yesterday and only driven about 25 miles, but I haven't heard any yet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,913
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Smitty462
    Newest Member
    Smitty462
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 654 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...