Jump to content

1500 with 6.2 or 2500 with stock engine


Recommended Posts

Posted

Daily driver about 20 miles a day. I have motorcycles also.

 

The 2500 catches my eye more. Mirrors, grill, taller, meaner.

 

but the 6.2 engine is sweet and seems like it would tow better with the higher torque and hp

 

can't decide!!

Posted

The 2500 is gonna tow a hair more (just how it's setup over a 1500), but if your only towing motorcycles go with a 1500 with a 6.2. Hell, the 5.3 is more than enough but if you got the coin and don't mind it, get the 6.2

 

The gearing in the transmissions are obviously different between the 1500 and 2500 so that's one of the reasons it can tow more. Plus suspension, brakes, etc.

Posted

i have an avalanche now and I'm disappointed when i pull a tailer with 2 bikes. the engine ramps up easily like when going up hills and on highway. town no issues, but highway the engine disappoints. otherwise the engine is fine to me.

 

the new 6.2 numbers look impressive.

 

will the 2500 ride a lot stiffer? Im going to test a 2500 next week. I have the 6.2 as a demo for the weekend

Posted

Yeah the 2500 will be a tad stiffer, but not terrible if you can live with it. Fuel mileage will also be worse with the 2500

Posted

Yeah the 2500 will be a tad stiffer, but not terrible if you can live with it. Fuel mileage will also be worse with the 2500

like what? 1 or 2 mpg?

Posted

Around town I've heard claims on the 2500 getting anywhere between 9-12 mpg. This is all hear say since I don't personally own one.

 

The 2015 6.2's come with the new 8 speed, so that's also something to consider

Posted

Trans ratios:

 

6L80 MYC 3.060 4.030 2.360 1.530 1.150 0.850 0.670

6L90 MYD 3.060 4.030 2.360 1.530 1.150 0.850 0.670

8L90 M5U 3.820 4.560 2.970 2.080 1.690 1.270 1.000 0.850 0.650

Posted

Trans ratios:

 

6L80 MYC 3.060 4.030 2.360 1.530 1.150 0.850 0.670

6L90 MYD 3.060 4.030 2.360 1.530 1.150 0.850 0.670

8L90 M5U 3.820 4.560 2.970 2.080 1.690 1.270 1.000 0.850 0.650

Ok......... Im lost. Ill admit it

Posted

like what? 1 or 2 mpg?

 

I have a '13 2500 HD with a 6.0L and 3.73 with 15k miles. Lifetime average mpg is 10.2. If its windy, you won't get 10mpg at 65 not pulling or hauling anything. The 6.0L is a dog and should be put down. I am trading in my 2500HD for a 1500 with max tow. I will probably go with a 5.3L so I don't have to buy premium fuel. The '15 1500 5.3 with max tow has 1400lbs. more towing capacity than my '13 2500HD.

 

I love my 2500HD, I love the stance, the ride height, etc. but the fuel mpg is a joke. If the 2500HD had the 5.3L motor, it would be perfect. My dad's 36' diesel motorhome gets better mpg pulling a car than I can get driving around town.

 

F.W.

Posted

Ok......... Im lost. Ill admit it

Rear end ratios of the 6 speed in the 1500 (6L80) and 6 speed in the 2500 (6L90) and for good measure the new 8 speed for 6.2.

 

Trans ratios are not different in the 2500, but they do offer different rear end ratios -- the 2500 6.0 uses a 4:10 rearend for 2015 and has a 13000lb max trailer rating for ball hitch, 13800 to 14800 depending of truck options for 5th wheel/gooseneck.

 

(8L90 is so used in full size SUV and in corvette)

Posted

 

I have a '13 2500 HD with a 6.0L and 3.73 with 15k miles. Lifetime average mpg is 10.2. If its windy, you won't get 10mpg at 65 not pulling or hauling anything. The 6.0L is a dog and should be put down. I am trading in my 2500HD for a 1500 with max tow. I will probably go with a 5.3L so I don't have to buy premium fuel. The '15 1500 5.3 with max tow has 1400lbs. more towing capacity than my '13 2500HD.

 

I love my 2500HD, I love the stance, the ride height, etc. but the fuel mpg is a joke. If the 2500HD had the 5.3L motor, it would be perfect. My dad's 36' diesel motorhome gets better mpg pulling a car than I can get driving around town.

 

F.W.

To the OP, I was in the exact same boat as you over the summer. But the post above is the exact reason I opted for the 1500 with the 6.2 and never looked back. Yeah, the 2500 is taller and meaner, but gasser mpg is terrible. My best 25 mile average on the 6.2L is over 21 mpg on the highway and it averages over 13 mpg all stop and go city driving. The 2500 was never going to best that.

Posted

To the OP, I was in the exact same boat as you over the summer. But the post above is the exact reason I opted for the 1500 with the 6.2 and never looked back. Yeah, the 2500 is taller and meaner, but gasser mpg is terrible. My best 25 mile average on the 6.2L is over 21 mpg on the highway and it averages over 13 mpg all stop and go city driving. The 2500 was never going to best that.

 

Do you have to run premium fuel in the 6.2L? Do you have any mpg numbers pulling with your 6.2L?

Posted

I'm averaging 16.2 with my 14 Denali 6.2, burning premium. Figure a 10% fuel price difference and it's like getting 14.5mpg. And I baby it, driving for best mpg most of the time.

 

Knowing this, if I'd gotten a 2500 and got 11-12mpg I wouldn't be losing any sleep over it.

Posted

I dont know why your looking at 2500 for towing bikes. Specially when you can get a 1500 with the 6.2l when in all reality the 5.3 is more than enough. Id think youd be lucky to get 12mpg in a 2500 with that motor.

 

With recent gains and newer technology in half tons the capability gap has lessened between 1500s and 2500s. Personally IMVHO minus a few niche applications, I fail to see the idea of buying a 2500 gasser anymmore.

Posted

Why buy a 2500/3500 gasser.. You want a daily driver, you need a big towing capacity/payload seldomly but once in a while, you don't want to spend $60k, and you want a truck that is simple/cheap to maintain and repair once the warranty is gone.

 

The duramax is a good engine, but personally I don't want to own ANY of these new diesels off warranty. I've had an 03 dmax, 08 powerstroke and a 12 cummins. 360 days of the year I didn't need them. The other 5 I could have done the job fine with a HD gasser.

 

For guys who tow frequently, put on a lot of highway miles, have a second vehicle for trips to the store, trade-in every few years, then maybe a diesel is the way to go.. But there are a lot of guys who don't want or need it.

 

A half ton is fine for most of the rest of us, unless you need the extra capacity a few times per year or have use for an 8' box. I bought a 1500 and should have just gotten a 2500 for the above reasons.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...