Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was under the impression that the bg service was similar in cleaning valves by using a cleaning chemical? I was thinking more along the lines of actually physically scraping or blasting off the carbon.

 

I think it's the same idea but BG supposedly is the holy grail of cleaning agents and it's a three part system that goes through different areas of the engine and fuel system. All I know is it was $150 for my wife's Hyundai Accent, BG warranties the engine up to $4,000 if you do this every 15,000 miles, and my mechanic who I really trust recommends it over the other products out there. He claimed BG actually had to dial back the performance of their chemicals because of the EPA or something to that effect haha

Posted

I was pleasantly surprised by how super easy it was to remove the intake baffle. In fact, from now on, I will be removing the baffle to take out the air cleaner box. No joke, I think it would be easier to take out the baffle first, and THEN take off the air filter cover in that order. Kinda ridiculous, but se la vie (sp? I dunno. The wife speaks French. I try. Mortitia?)

 

I am stock here as well. But, definitely looking forward to the day that I replace the Goodyear's with Michelin LTx's. 3.42's of course w/ the 6.2.

Posted

 

I think it's the same idea but BG supposedly is the holy grail of cleaning agents and it's a three part system that goes through different areas of the engine and fuel system. All I know is it was $150 for my wife's Hyundai Accent, BG warranties the engine up to $4,000 if you do this every 15,000 miles, and my mechanic who I really trust recommends it over the other products out there. He claimed BG actually had to dial back the performance of their chemicals because of the EPA or something to that effect haha

 

No question, the BG service is likely far and above the CRC treatment. But for $10...you can do this literally 15x for the same price, give or take. For me, I'll home remedy this as long as I can. I've never had a vehicle which didn't require some home maintenance to maintain optimum levels of performance, and I consider this no different. Heck, I completely disassembled the wife's NorthStar to fix the notorious block leak. I'm glad that's behind me, and a can of spray goodness on occasion is a welcomed reprieve. Man that sucked.

 

Look. We (speaking collectively, the buying public) wanted mileage, performance and reliability...kinda in that order. And GM delivered in spades. Others tried and failed horribly, I won't mention names.

 

I still think this is hands down the single best vehicle I have ever owned all taken into account. But I'm not saying it doesn't take some effort on the buyers' part to maintain it. I think this falls into the realm of maintenance.

 

What I DO disagree with is the fact that GM, and almost all other manufacturers, tend to avoid the education component to this. These are diesel engines with a spark plug. They need a different regimen of maintenance in order to perform as designed. But marketing has trumped engineering yet again and we have to figure this out for ourselves. BMW, Mercedes and others decided to address this by taking over ALL of the maintenance during the warranty period. HELLO...anytime an OEM decides to benevolently do the maintenance for the buyer during the warranty period...even though you PAID dearly for it...raise a flag people. Raise the freakin flag.

 

/soapbox off

Posted

I'd chip in to have that 1/4 oz of stuff analyzed. From the color, it looks typical of what we used to collect in catch cans on airplanes I flew. A big portion was water and mixed with oil, forming a "coffee and cream" colored solution.

Posted

I'd chip in to have that 1/4 oz of stuff analyzed. From the color, it looks typical of what we used to collect in catch cans on airplanes I flew. A big portion was water and mixed with oil, forming a "coffee and cream" colored solution.

 

Oh yeah. There is a LOT of moisture in this no doubt. You don't get a brown/coffee color without moisture. It was a reasonably middle of the road day here. Not too hot, not too cold. Medium humidity.

 

But 54mi? Seriously? Let's say that it's 10% oil. Fairly forgiving there. That means that in 540 miles an engine designed to have a DRY INTAKE has ingested 1/4 oz of oil. I hope to keep this thing for many, MANY times that. The math doesn't give a favorable answer.

Posted

Its super easy to clean, dont need to change your clothes, loosen two screws to remove air tube. Remove 4 bolts holding on throttle body.

Posted

Looking at the CRC cleaner on amazon and came across the CRC MAF sensor cleaner. Anyone use this with their intake cleaning? Does the MAF sensor even need to be cleaned?

Posted

Today's commute. Same yadda yadda yadda. Maybe less stop and go today. I did reset a bit late as the onramp this morning was an exciting event.

 

 

post-128223-0-11407000-1427473162_thumb.jpg

post-128223-0-11407000-1427473162_thumb.jpg

post-128223-0-11407000-1427473162_thumb.jpg

post-128223-0-11407000-1427473162_thumb.jpg

Posted

Looking at the CRC cleaner on amazon and came across the CRC MAF sensor cleaner. Anyone use this with their intake cleaning? Does the MAF sensor even need to be cleaned?

 

I didn't, but I probably will next time. The MAF should NEVER see any oil. It sits right behind the filter with nothing to get oil in there. But it can get a bit nasty over time just from the bits that the filter misses. I would expect it to be pretty clean at the moment. But, it's cheap, can't hurt.

  • Like 1
Posted

Today's commute. Same yadda yadda yadda. Maybe less stop and go today. I did reset a bit late as the onramp this morning was an exciting event.

 

 

Do like 500 miles and lets see a real average. Nice numbers tho.
  • Like 2
Posted

Do like 500 miles and lets see a real average. Nice numbers tho.

 

While I certainly don't mind doing that, unfortunately I didn't get a 500mi "snapshot" prior to the clean. The only thing I could think of that was extremely repeatable was my daily commute, hence my choice. Plus, I can update every day. Not that I don't love you guys ;) but I wasn't going to drive for 10 hours for a good baseline, clean the intake, and then drive the same exact 10 hours to compare.

 

But don't get me wrong, I do NOT average 24mpg. Cause I drive like a bat outta hell most of the time. Morning commute, can't, too much traffic. So it's the same ol, same ol. But in between, GET OUTTA MAH WAY!! :)

Posted

Lol. No bro i mean like a weeks driving... i used to get good numbers nothing like u 6.2 guys but since bigger tires leveling the truck i lost 2-3. But it's starting to go back up dince its getting nicer out. I use my 2 trip counters trip 1 for the tank of gas i fill up. Trip 2 from my last oil change i did. Im right at 31,xxx miles. Thinking of doing the crc just would like yo see some numbers over 400+ miles

Posted

Sorta on the topic, but I have a theory on the 6.2 vs 5.3 mileage. The V4 mode in the 6.2 has a larger displacement as compared to the 5.3 in the same mode. In fact, the 5.3 has the smallest displacement of all:

 

4.3: 2.87L

5.3: 2.65L

6.2: 3.1L

 

So, the theory may hold that the 6.2 may be able to produce the greatest power in V4, and would, therefore, be able to enter V4 and hold it longer since the move to/from V4 is based largely on engine demand vs output. The 6.2 maaaay have sliiiightly higher pumping/frictional losses in V4, but I bet this is negligible.

 

As V4 mode is a big player in mileage, I wonder if this is actually a GOOD element with respect to the 6.2?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,467 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
    • Do you have access to BP fuels? Some stations have Silver 91 E-0 priced the same as their 93 E-10.  There is a local Marathon with 90 alky free for $6 a gallon but I go down the road to BP for $5-ish. They also have a 100 E-0 but that stuff is $10 a pop. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...