Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, steve76t said:

so far I like them.  Haven't had any snow to really see how they perform there, but on the road they are fairly quiet & smooth.  They are a little stiffer than the stock Goodyear Eagle LS-2s.  Those were really a grand touring car tire & not made for dirt or snow.  

they are definitely a front runner for me. i had ls2s on my 2007 sierra when i first got that back in the day and they are a terrible tire for snow/ice and compacted snow. i live in north dakota so a good winter tire is a must. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Herms21 said:

they are definitely a front runner for me. i had ls2s on my 2007 sierra when i first got that back in the day and they are a terrible tire for snow/ice and compacted snow. i live in north dakota so a good winter tire is a must. 

In that case, yes the BFGs should be a great choice as they have a very good reputation for snowy conditions.  The other option, which I was also considering, would be the Goodyear Duratrac.  They don't offer that tire in a 285/55r20 size which is one reason I went the with BFG.   

Posted
9 minutes ago, steve76t said:

In that case, yes the BFGs should be a great choice as they have a very good reputation for snowy conditions.  The other option, which I was also considering, would be the Goodyear Duratrac.  They don't offer that tire in a 285/55r20 size which is one reason I went the with BFG.   

i like the duratracs as well. they are a second choice for me and possibly the cooper stt pro. there is a tire that seems to be a knock off of the duratracs which are the kanati trail hog but unsure if they are offered in that size i guess. can’t fond much on them from people that have run them otherwise i’d maybe give them a try myself. 

Posted

May have the same or similar tread pattern, but the rubber compound has a lot to do with the mountain/snowflake rating.  Don't know if the Kanati tires have that or not. 

 

Don't know how important that is in N Dakota, but going over the Sierra passes often have chain controls and CalTrans stops get very picky about what tires can continue on the hwys without chains. They'll close the roads before requiring 4wd's with snowtires to chain up.

Posted
9 minutes ago, steve76t said:

May have the same or similar tread pattern, but the rubber compound has a lot to do with the mountain/snowflake rating.  Don't know if the Kanati tires have that or not. 

 

Don't know how important that is in N Dakota, but going over the Sierra passes often have chain controls and CalTrans stops get very picky about what tires can continue on the hwys without chains. They'll close the roads before requiring 4wd's with snowtires to chain up.

don’t believe they have that rating. it’s one of those things where “you get what you pay for” i imagine. bought cheaper knock offs in my younger days but have learned my lesson. 

 

really no regulations here in nodak other than if you run studded tires; which i have never encountered anyone that does, to have them off by a certain date. here it’s kind of use your own judgment and if you’re stupid enough to go out in bad conditions you get what you deserve and traffic fines will be handed out if it gets to the point where interstate has been shut down. 

 

my brother runs the ko2s on his vehicles and has had nothing but good things to say about them. his see a lot of gravel and they wear quite well for him and perform well in the winter. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Herms21 said:

really no regulations here in nodak other than if you run studded tires; which i have never encountered anyone that does, to have them off by a certain date. here it’s kind of use your own judgment and if you’re stupid enough to go out in bad conditions you get what you deserve and traffic fines will be handed out if it gets to the point where interstate has been shut down. 

 

Wish it were like that around here.  There are lots of idiot drivers from CA that have not clue how to drive in the snow.  CalTrans and Cali's CHP have to monitor the idiots and have ridiculous rules when driving over the mountains.  Most of the time requiring chains before snow even starts sticking to the streets.   Luckily I'm in NV and don't see them everyday.  Just when I want to go skiing or going over the hills to visit family in the Sacramento area. 

Posted
On 5/27/2017 at 10:48 PM, 6TEEN5.3 said:

Not lifted just leveled.

 

33 ridge grapplers on stockers

 

6c66b155b8533967b0451efe8a67ff7f.jpg

 

fe67fe989674110dd242d93f1fde6330.jpg

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Is that a 285/70/17 or the 285/75/17 I’ve been trying to figure out if I can run the 285/75/17 with a 2.5 rc kit on my factory wheels 

Posted
Is that a 285/70/17 or the 285/75/17 I’ve been trying to figure out if I can run the 285/75/17 with a 2.5 rc kit on my factory wheels 

 

 

They’re 33x12.50r17. Pretty much the same height as the 285/70 but wider. I swapped the 33s for 315/70r17 and only rub the wheel liner

 

674da694d1bbdaa69137e162aeb797f3.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, 6TEEN5.3 said:

 

 


They’re 33x12.50r17. Pretty much the same height as the 275/70 but wider. I swapped the 33s for 315/70r17 and only rub the wheel liner

674da694d1bbdaa69137e162aeb797f3.jpg

 

 

Ok thanks man the 315s look to be about an inch taller and wider than what I’m going with, so you believe they will work with the 285/75 or 33.86x11.25

Posted
Ok thanks man the 315s look to be about an inch taller and wider than what I’m going with, so you believe they will work with the 285/75 or 33.86x11.25



I’m sure they’ll will be fine. These work for me but I’m not gonna be jumping ditches and whatnot
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Got into a new 2017 1500 All-Terrain earlier last year and just getting around to a lift. There are two shops close by that claim it would be near impossible to run a Zone 6.5 or anything similar with my stock 20x9s and 34/35 inch treads. Is this just a lazy approach by the shop

 

I don't remember having such an issue with my 2014 that had 18" stockers, besides running spacers. Am I just barking up the wrong tree as far as the shops or am I missing something?

Posted
Got into a new 2017 1500 All-Terrain earlier last year and just getting around to a lift. There are two shops close by that claim it would be near impossible to run a Zone 6.5 or anything similar with my stock 20x9s and 34/35 inch treads. Is this just a lazy approach by the shop
 
I don't remember having such an issue with my 2014 that had 18" stockers, besides running spacers. Am I just barking up the wrong tree as far as the shops or am I missing something?

I think they are full of it I think the stock 20's would work fine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted

Here is mine 2014 Silverado Motofab 2.5" front 2" rear on stock LTZ wheels with 305/55/20 (33x12.50) Falken wildpeak at3w d52fbcde455efd6cf59d5448b2b21347.jpg45380a2e3b56c7aae36db256decc5e9e.jpg

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, 14 Silvy said:


I think they are full of it I think the stock 20's would work fine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Stock backspacing should be roughly 6" (6.06" for the sticklers). Zone states that 5.75" of backspace as the limit for running 35x12.50 on a 20" rim. So looks like a 1" spacer all around should do the trick?

Posted (edited)

post-178256-0-52721700-1507075773_thumb.jpegpost-178256-0-38341600-1507075798_thumb.jpegpost-178256-0-23509700-1507075758_thumb.jpegIf you have +27 stock 20’s put in a 1/2” spacer and you will be fine. I have a zone 4.5 with 33’s. No rubbing whatsoever. I just won a 6” BDS from Custom Offsets and they said I can run 35’s with this setup with no rubbing. Good luck.  You’ll have a whole new truck once it’s lifted 

Edited by Daug207
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,858 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...