Jump to content

6.2 Visual difference from 5.3


Recommended Posts

Posted

Regarding 2015-2016 6.2 - is there a way to look under the hood and tell if the engine is a 6.2 or 5.3. I know the window sticker, etc will tell you. But I want to know what are some actual visual differences?

Posted

Open the gas filler door and look for the premium fuel sticker. Only the 6.2L uses premium.

 

The only visual difference I know is the PVC hose routing is different between the two engines. I'm not sure if you can see this with the throttle body and factory intake silencer box in place. I don't see the engine listed on the radiator cover stickers.

Posted

The PCV vent hose is right by the throttle body on the 6.2. It goes from the crankcase, under the TB, to right on top of the front of the intake manifold.

 

Whereas the 5.3 runs from under the TB to back on the drivers side of the intake manifold.

 

6.2L

gm-6-2l-v8-ecotec3-l86-engine-2.jpg

 

5.3L

gm-5-3l-v8-ecotec3-l83-engine-1.jpg

Posted

6.2 exhaust comes straight out the back. 5.3 right side exit.

Nope, same exhaust exit. Though I think the 6.2L exhaust is slightly bigger.

Posted

 

 

6.2 exhaust comes straight out the back. 5.3 right side exit.

 

Not on the 2014+

 

 

 

Here is a better pic of the PCV hoses

 

6.2L

ZIfEIuy.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.3L

 

VyWl8GI.jpg

Posted

Nope, same exhaust exit. Though I think the 6.2L exhaust is slightly bigger.

Aw man, didn't know they changed it!

Posted

Nope, same exhaust exit. Though I think the 6.2L exhaust is slightly bigger.

Slightly? 2.75" vs 3.5"! The 6.2 has some pipes! ;)
Posted

Im hoping this makes the 5.3 to 6.2 conversion as easy as it looks. Im sure well find out in the next few years after warranty's are up.

Posted

perfect.... I may be picking up a new one tomorrow... just want to be 100% sure I have the "balls to the wall" power plant.....regardless of the window sticker..

Posted

Not sure if you can visually spot the difference immediately, but 6.2 throttle bodies are larger than the 5.3

Posted

To be 100% absolutely sure, look for the PVC hose and check the RPO code sticker in the glove box.

 

6.2L is L86 and 5.3L is L83.

Posted

IIRC you can also look for a "J" as the 8th character of the VIN, which ID's the 6.2L power plant.

 

There is a GM VIN decoder but Tapatalk image link function is fungued.

 

Edit: below may work

 

image_zpspfkwx5xc.png

Posted

Should be a sticker on the air box that says whether it is a 5.3 or 6.2 if all else fails

Posted

6.2 exhaust comes straight out the back. 5.3 right side exit.

True for GMT900 trucks and SUV.

 

VORTEC MAX was a badge for the 6.0 Equipped half tons.

 

I don't know why GM never made a badge for the 6.2.

 

Motors now are Ecotec3. ECOMAX? No, that doesn't sound right...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is exactly the reason our EV has consumed so much of my driving. I don't want to fire up a cold diesel or gas engine just to drive 2 miles up to the store. It's arguably terrible for an engine. If I'm not driving at least 10 miles and don't need to do truck things, the truck stays parked.   Enter the EV. It's immediately heating or cooling the cabin as needed (heat pump). An engine doesn't need to warm up or be driven gently. I can tear off in it with ZERO guilt. Move the car 1/4 mile from store to store and not think "gee, I'm short-cycling a lukewarm engine".   It doesn't idle in a drive-through. Doesn't idle at stop lights. (OK, neither would the diesel, if I let stop-start have its way, but I don't).   Even moving it out of the garage to wash it... HA! It doesn't need to be started just to move 40 feet. I have cars that I will actually put in neutral and push (no start) in/out of the garage or shop if they absolutely HAVE to be moved. My nice Camaros.
    • Some trailer plugs don't work. This one worked for me. Been using it for two years no issues. Amazon.com: Reese Trailer Plug Adapter, 7-Way Male Plug to 7-Way Female Plug, LED Lamp Out By-Pass, Plastic, Black, Each : Automotive
    • Great video. I almost want to reserve one now.
    • I traced the atf cooling system in my 1500 and it comes out of the transmission, into the bar/plate liquid/liquid heat exchanger, as stated above.  Then it crosses over to the external thermostat/bypass and then  to the aux cooler in front of the main radiator.  Hence, on this routing, the PPE thermostat bypass eliminator is an $85 piece of bling that does nothing for reducing atf temps on this truck.  I think I'll temporarily clamp a needle nose vise grip on the coolant feed hose to the bar/plate cooler and see how much the atf temp drops.  With the use of ULV trans fluid, I'm not convinced running the trans cooler than OEM spec is going to be detrimental to the life of the transmission.    I found this interesting on the Dana/Long site stating that they make transmission cooling/heating bar plate heat exchangers.  I worked with Dana/Long on a few projects when I was at the gas powered fun factory. https://www.dana.co.jp/downloads/PTG/Long/Dana_TOC_SpecSht.pdf  Bar plate heat exchangers are just a stack of stamped parallel path fluid channels, assembled and vacuum furnace brazed to make the final assembly.  Want more cooling/heating, just stack more plates until you run out of package space.   Anyway, thanks for the info, much appreciated.
    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...