Jump to content

Suggestions For Muffler Trial


ProModMike

Recommended Posts

Posted

No problem!! I'm just taking advantage of an opportunity to do what we all would love to see done, that's all. We've ALL been there and done that. God, if I had a nickel for every time I was the "don't buy that, it's junk, ask me how I know" guy.

You could build another racecar!! LMAO

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

If you don't mind sharing, what shop are you doing this at? I am in the Houston area and I had planned on doing something similar to Silverado Ice 6.2--->

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/179280-updated-exhaust-vids/

 

Except I think I would use a different xr-1 muffler. Part # 40946. It's oval and length is 22 inches.

 

Is this something y'all would want to test also?

Posted

You could build another racecar!! LMAO

Yeah, that's what I need, lol. Sh*t, I'm ready to burn the current one to the ground most days, lol.

Posted

If you don't mind sharing, what shop are you doing this at? I am in the Houston area and I had planned on doing something similar to Silverado Ice 6.2--->

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/179280-updated-exhaust-vids/

 

Except I think I would use a different xr-1 muffler. Part # 40946. It's oval and length is 22 inches.

 

Is this something y'all would want to test also?

I don't mind, Sneaky. But I reached out to the forum community on a whim for input. I haven't asked permission to disclose the business name. I by no means am directly affiliated by way of their payroll or any other fashion outside of being a loyal customer for quite some time. I simply stopped by one day to inquire about what he might recommend for me and he said, "ya know, you're like the 150th person to ask me that about one of these new trucks. Maybe we should try some stuff out so I can answer that". Let me run it by him before I put his name out there and he ends up with a bunch of forum members saying Mike said he has magic exhaust system for $300, lol. If you would like to PM me, I can give you more info.

 

For whatever reason, he's only wanting to try out the Magnaflows this time around. And the ProXS because I already have it. But that doesn't mean in the future more wouldn't get tested. We had to pick a starting point and if you don't keep it simple at first, it can get expensive, so I guess Magnaflow is it for now.

Posted

Yeah, that's what I need, lol. Sh*t, I'm ready to burn the current one to the ground most days, lol.

Put a Pontiac power plant in it! Lol

Posted

Subscribed. ProMod, appreciate the efforts here and your knowledge. What other impact do you think the Borla flapper upstream has on the exhaust other than noise? Do you think it is any less efficient or moreso in terms of power output? What is the difference between flapper and the Borla jughandle on the front side of the system?

 

I've had good luck with Borla on other vehicles and just installed the GM Borla system on the 6.2L. As advertised, zero drone (no audible change whatsoever V4 vs V8). Deep rumble at start up and at city speeds with audible notes corresponding to RPM and shifter increments, both up and down. Hardly noticeable at highway cruise unless ascending under load, but aggression shows with the right foot. I thought it was perfect, so much so had it welded vs. clamped cause it aint going anywhere.

Posted

This is what I have borla xr1 40722.. I wanted to do my own version of the gm borla.. but since the valve is 3 inch I left it in the same spot since the inlet up front of a 6.2 is 3.5.. anyways here's some videos of my set up.. feel free to look at my other videos... I get complements all the time.. wow that sounds good etc. Sounds quiet at cruise... again I have the 6.2

 

 

Posted

Put a Pontiac power plant in it! Lol

I thought you said build a race car, lol. Who do I look like, Big Chief, lol? Supposedly that's a Pontiac 482 in the "CrowMod". It's gnarly though.

Posted

Subscribed. ProMod, appreciate the efforts here and your knowledge. What other impact do you think the Borla flapper upstream has on the exhaust other than noise? Do you think it is any less efficient or moreso in terms of power output? What is the difference between flapper and the Borla jughandle on the front side of the system?

 

I've had good luck with Borla on other vehicles and just installed the GM Borla system on the 6.2L. As advertised, zero drone (no audible change whatsoever V4 vs V8). Deep rumble at start up and at city speeds with audible notes corresponding to RPM and shifter increments, both up and down. Hardly noticeable at highway cruise unless ascending under load, but aggression shows with the right foot. I thought it was perfect, so much so had it welded vs. clamped cause it aint going anywhere.

Based on the tension progression of the spring on the flapper valve, I would feel comfortable saying it couldn't possibly effect power. Efficiency? Maybe, but in the grand scheme of things, to a negligible point. Think of it like an adjustable bend in the pipe that straightens or bends more depending on flow velocity. So the "jug handle" you see on the GM Borla system acts like a resonator. They're actually called J-pipes and guys buy them off the shelf or build them into cars like the G8 or CTS-V that have absolutely HORRIBLE drone due to very rearward muffler location. It's basically redirecting a small amount of flow around a point of turbulence to help reduce vibration. They definitely work. We have some on standby. Meaning, we're going to control our variables and only change one thing at a time so we know what's having greater effect. If we install a muffler and the valve upstream and we still get noticeable drone or chopper sound, we may introduce the J-pipe. Based on the size of the pipe on the truck and the point at which Borla put the J-pipe, I'm confident we can duplicate it easily.

 

I was very pleased with the GM Borla system we have installed on the other truck!! it's of quality material and design and is exactly as advertised and as you've described. However, it's outside the budgetary reach of what most guys who drive their trucks every day want to, or can spend. So our goal isn't to compete with the GM Borla system, but maybe see if we can piece together some more budget friendly options for the guys who just want a little more sound and that's all they plan to change about the truck, or the guys like myself who CAN afford the GM Borla system, but just don't WANT to, lol.

Posted

This is what I have borla xr1 40722.. I wanted to do my own version of the gm borla.. but since the valve is 3 inch I left it in the same spot since the inlet up front of a 6.2 is 3.5.. anyways here's some videos of my set up.. feel free to look at my other videos... I get complements all the time.. wow that sounds good etc. Sounds quiet at cruise... again I have the 6.2

 

 

Ice, nicely done. I see in one video you have the factory resonator and in the other it's gone. Am I correct? If so, why the change? Were the effects noticeable? Positive or negative?

Posted

I think the Walker 21138 is over looked and it's only $60 shipped to your door.

 

RT

It's not that we've overlooked it, but we're just choosing Magnaflow as a starting point as they're very popular. Once we feel like we have a system where we can basically swap in a muffler of choice and end up with similar outcomes, we'll start exploring many more options.

Posted

Ice, nicely done. I see in one video you have the factory resonator and in the other it's gone. Am I correct? If so, why the change? Were the effects noticeable? Positive or negative?

I put the muffler on first cause i was waiting on the tips and the mandrel bent exhaust tubing to complete the install. I just didn't want to wait. So i put the muffler on first. I'm hoping one day I can find a 3.5 flapper valve to stick in front of the muffler.. but I doubt borla would just sell me that.. oh well well anyways I'm 100% happy with it.. oh and just doing the muffler swap alone well let's just say it was way to quiet.. sounded just like someone doing a muffler delete.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,980
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Fishboat
    Newest Member
    Fishboat
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 515 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...