Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not a dumb question, but vague as there are two bed lengths for 2014+up 1500 crew cab.

 

By checking other posts you have, I found the only picture I saw posted of your truck: http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/154469-post-pics-of-your-2014/?p=1725235

 

Judging on the position of the gas door (its on the "fender" of the box and not on the flat section), it appears that you have the 5ft 8in box.

  • Like 1
Posted

thanks for the response, is the 5ft 8' the most common?

It's the most common on the 1500 crew cab trucks. The double, and regular cabs are usually a 6.5 ft bed.

Posted

thanks for the response, is the 5ft 8' the most common?

 

Not any more on these new ones. Its close to a 50/50 spilt near me. We move more 6ft 6in crews than we do 5ft 8in. 5ft. 8in. was the only size from 2005-2013 on 1500 crew.

Posted (edited)

What 15HD said.

If your fuel filler door is parallel to the side of the truck because it is not on the fender you have a 6' 6" bed.

2015-Chevrolet-Silverado-1500-Cropped-w8

 

If the filler door is at an angle because it is on the wheel fender then you have a 5' 8" bed.

1216201558970b2e93d0912c5d8d7d0b.jpg

Edited by crewl1
  • Like 1
Posted

Interesting, good to know that the fuel door is a dead give away. I never thought of that, just used to judge by the space between the wheel and the cab.

 

Sure glad they brought back the "longer" bed...

  • Like 2
Posted

Interesting, good to know that the fuel door is a dead give away. I never thought of that, just used to judge by the space between the wheel and the cab.

 

Sure glad they brought back the "longer" bed...

Same here.... Love the longer bed on my double cab.... Fits all my chet when i mive from jobsite to jobsite.

 

Sent from my Note 4 on Tapashit

Posted

Yep it's the main reason why I upgraded my truck. I owned a 2011 EXT cab Reg box. Felt so bad putting people in the back seat haha but didn't want to sacrifice box space. Now with these new trucks the Crew cabs are HUGE and the normal sized box is really nice. I think it gives the truck a better overall look.

Posted

If it was for a Crew Sierra, the fuel filler door is flat on standard bed and bent on short bed.

Posted

I really found the 5' 8" bed to be a great size for me. It's long and wide enough for me to fit 6 boats stacked on their sides, and I can also sleep in the bed diagonally with the tailgate up. I looked at one of the long bed Crew Cabs but for some of the places I need to get to, it looked like I might have trouble negotiating some turns.

Posted

I really found the 5' 8" bed to be a great size for me. It's long and wide enough for me to fit 6 boats stacked on their sides, and I can also sleep in the bed diagonally with the tailgate up. I looked at one of the long bed Crew Cabs but for some of the places I need to get to, it looked like I might have trouble negotiating some turns.

Yeah, I get nervous going through some of the fast food drive thru's I visit.

 

Gonna have to start walking in, dang it! :D

Posted

Yeah, I get nervous going through some of the fast food drive thru's I visit.

 

Gonna have to start walking in, dang it! :D

 

I have to admit, for all but about 5% of the situations I use my truck for, I wish I had the longer bed. Very handy.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,743 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...