Jump to content

2015 Yukon Denali 2WD Excessive road vibration and transmission shudde


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, dwchapmanjr said:

Could be the TCC but the detect that plagued 2015i/2016 shouldn't have persisted into 2017.  It can also be the AFM.  When in manual mode the AFM is supposed to be disabled.  I've heard the fix for shuddering due to AFM may be a fuel injector cleaning and in some cases the shop will disable AFM if its really annoying/problematic.

 

After 3 years of the transmission though I will say that sometimes it just shifts roughly or clunks and ocassionally I'll still get a shudder when shifting even after the TCC was replaced.

I don't think it's AFM - maybe.. it happens very frequently.. even when accelerating from 0.. when all 8 cylinders should be  being used. at almost every shift I can feel it. although, i didn't feel it when the engine sat overnight.

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I haven't had to do a ton of highway driving since I had the TCC replaced but recently had to twice and noticed the terrible shudder.  Most of my driving has been back roads with a top speed of 45.  This time it seems a bit different though.  Previously I could notice it at any gear with light acceleration but now it only seems to happen in 8th with AFM on.  I could not reproduce in manual 7th but I do not do a ton of highway driving so I'll have to test further and likely have them check this out at my next oil change.  Unfortunately PIP-5337 states if it appears to be AFM related, this is normal.  Sometimes I can get it to shudder for quite a few seconds while its still in 4 cylinder though.

 

PIP5228 seems close but doesn't apply to V8 and it seems to imply a constant vibration.  This vibration happens when tapping gas pedal or touching it lightly when in the 1200-1600 RPM range only in 8th with AFM on.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Just an FYI on this.  I scheduled a service appointment because I needed some fluid changes and to do the Electric Power Steering recall as well and mentioned the shudder.

 

I go in next Wednesday and sounds like they want to keep it for a few days but he did mention GM is having them put a new transmission fluid in this and its "supposed to" correct this but that they just started swapping these fluids out about 2-3 weeks ago so he couldn't say whether he's seen improvement.

 

When I originally had this issue the bulletin PIP5337 was up to E and there is now a PIP5337K which references bulletin 16-NA-175 which is just a double fluid flush.  I will post an update when I get it back but I imagine it will take a week or so for the transmission to learn again even after a fast learn.  My driving patterns don't usually allow me to reproduce this issue either.

Posted

I was told by a friend, service writer, that GM was coming out with a new fluid after the first of the year to address this issue. good luck with the repair.

Posted
9 hours ago, Tahoe02 said:

I was told by a friend, service writer, that GM was coming out with a new fluid after the first of the year to address this issue. good luck with the repair.

Yes, I've read a few forum posts and seen that the new fluid is hopeful to resolve this.  My dealer has been doing the new fluid for 2 weeks now.  Apparently the old fluids retain water over time which makes sense why it has taken so long for them to resolve this.  Fingers crossed!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I just took my truck in and they flushed it with the new fluid.  The paperwork is pretty light on details but listed the new procedure 18-NA-355.  Runs perfectly, just as it did after the last fluid flush and TC replacement.  Fingers crossed this is it.

Posted

I just realized I had not updated this post with the information on the new procedure.  There are a couple other forums that I was posting on.  The new procedure is 18-NA-355 which includes a new tool used to flush/fill and a new fluid.  Its the new fluid that is supposed to be a permanent fix.  Part number on the fluid is 19417577.

 

After a day driving in various conditions the transmissions is still very responsive.  This is supposed to be the final fix but only time will tell as this issue does not immediately reappear.

  • 3 months later...
Posted
On 8/31/2016 at 6:12 PM, dwchapmanjr said:

 

Yes, TCC = Torque Converter Clutch

 

I found that if I warmed up the transmission by driving on the highway I could easily reproduce it constantly at 70mph or at lower speeds after TCC fully locked and slightly pushing the gas.

 

The dealers do not like being told how to diagnose the problem but make sure they are aware of PIP5337 (specifically PIP5337 revision E From Aug 2016) for the TCC issue. If they have not done many TCC replacements they may not be aware of it.

 

There is a separate bulletin for the lurching from park to drive. The stator needs to be reinserted and I would make them aware of both of these issues and service bulletins beforehand as they might as well address the stator while replacing the TCC.

 

They may run the calibration if you have never had it done or are not running the latest for the TCC. It will run rough for a few tanks of gas afterwards but if you're feeling the issue now, it ultimately won't resolve it because the TCC is probably heavily worn already which that calibration is supposed to help avoid.

I have a 2016 Suburban LT.  I own a transportation company and generally put between 50-70k miles per year on our SUVs. 80% of them are having transmission issues around 160k miles. I started having issues with it slipping and hard shifting at about 100k miles. I also had the shuddering/vibration issues. So, I opted to have a new/rebuilt 6-speed transmission installed 3,000 miles ago. What didn't change was the shuddering/vibration. It's more noticeable around 1200 rpms. It's weird because if I am on the accelerator it vibrates. As soon as I let off, it just about goes away. I took it back to the GM dealership, and of course they said some BS that the vibration was normal - the Service Manager actually did a ride-along and noticed it as I was driving. He said it was the TCC. They reprogrammed the Transmission, as I was and still having issues with the Active Grade Braking not engaging correctly after the new transmission.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...