Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2014 Silverado with 42K miles. On Sunday, I was pulling into the garage after a short errand and I lost most of the braking power. I was able to stop the truck by pressing the brake pedal hard. I immediately drove backwards and it did the same thing. I had it towed to a local mechanic on Monday to have the braking system checked out. They had it for about 4 hours and could not find anything wrong. They showed me an article how the ABS system can kick in if the system is over worked due to hot weather, driving up hills, frequent stops, etc. However, I just was away for 15 minutes: it's in lower 60s and I wasn't doing hills or frequent stops. The mechanic did 2 test drives and he told me the braking system was fine.

 

I carefully drove it to the GM dealership for a 2nd opinion and within 15 minutes they diagnosed it as a weak vacuum pump. It was only doing 10 in Hg and it should be doing 27 in Hg. My question is having a vacuum pump as part of a braking system exotic? Is this something a normal mechanic should have been able to diagnose? I found the TSB here by Googling vacuum and 12669488 as the part # which describes the problem perfectly: http://m.gm.oemdtc.com/TSB/SB-10081053-2280.pdf

 

I guess my worry is that this mechanic gave me a clean bill of health on the braking system which shakes my confidence in any future work he may do for me. Are these 2014+ Silverados just too new or specialized to be worked on by normal mechanics?

 

 

Posted

Short answer, no. You're local tech should have been able to check vaccum. However, these new trucks are very complex so it takes some understanding of how everything is integrated.

 

It's not getting any easier by any means

Posted (edited)

Hopefully they checked for oil/fluids in the vacuum pump lines...

 

#PIT5361B: Diagnostic Tip - Additional Brake Pedal Effort - (Jun 28, 2016)

 

The following diagnosis might be helpful if the vehicle exhibits the symptom(s) described in this PI.

Condition/Concern

In some rare situations, a customer may comment on a hard brake pedal or that increased effort is needed to depress the brake pedal. Also, in some cases a tick or ticking noise may be heard, which may sound like an exhaust manifold leak. While performing normal diagnostics, fluid may be found in the brake booster and/or the booster vacuum line.

 

Important: Pay close attention to the fluid and if it is determined to be engine oil, it could be coming from the vacuum pump. The vacuum pump is belt-driven and mounted to the side of the engine block. It is lubricated by pressurized engine oil.

Recommendation/Instructions

If engine oil is found, it is important the following parts are replaced. If not, the condition will return.

  1. Vacuum Pump
  2. Vacuum Line between the booster and the pump
  3. Brake Booster
  4. Master Cylinder
  5. Vacuum Pump Belt

 

Edited by 15HDriver
Posted

Yeah, I hope so too. I was reading one story where a guy's vacuum pump was defective and pushed back bits of metal back into the engine block and toasted it. Since the dealer did the repair they should be responsible if anything like that should happen.

Posted

Did you report this as a safety issue?

 

https://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/VehicleComplaint/

 

Why would he need to do this? It's no different than losing the power steering pump and you have to actually use some muscle to steer. The vacuum pump just assists the breaks in that you don't have to push so hard on the pedal to apply the breaks. He never lost breaking just had to push the pedal harder to stop. Would it be surprising to be in this condition. Absolutely Yes however he has done the right thing and had it towed to the repair shop. Try letting your truck roll in neutral with the engine off. You have to press the breaks hard but, it will stop.

Posted

Vacuum pumps were on the earlier 2000 pickups IIRC... not really a rare system, or very complicated to check vacuum.

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Posted

 

Why would he need to do this? It's no different than losing the power steering pump and you have to actually use some muscle to steer. The vacuum pump just assists the breaks in that you don't have to push so hard on the pedal to apply the breaks. He never lost breaking just had to push the pedal harder to stop. Would it be surprising to be in this condition. Absolutely Yes however he has done the right thing and had it towed to the repair shop. Try letting your truck roll in neutral with the engine off. You have to press the breaks hard but, it will stop.

Doesn't matter that you can figure out how to stop in this situation. It is a safety issue and if systematic should be a safety recall. Reporting the issue to NHTSA can help force an investigation.

Posted

I hope this doesn't sidetrack this thread, but I was unaware that these trucks had a vacuum pump. The engine doesn't develop enough vacuum on it's own?

Posted

I hope this doesn't sidetrack this thread, but I was unaware that these trucks had a vacuum pump. The engine doesn't develop enough vacuum on it's own?

 

AFM is why. It allowed them to change the AFM so it runs more with low/no load. When you drop 4 cylinders, you drop your vacuum supply. Helps for added brake assist to increase pedal feel over the last gen as well.

  • Like 1
Posted

Doesn't matter that you can figure out how to stop in this situation. It is a safety issue and if systematic should be a safety recall. Reporting the issue to NHTSA can help force an investigation.

 

I fail to see is why it's a safety issue. The breaking system Never failed. You just have to press the pedal harder. When the power steering pump goes out it's a safety issue to? You don't lose steering just the assistance to turn the wheel easier.

  • 5 months later...
Posted (edited)

This happened to me today. Ordering a new pump. I can tell you this, you have to push down really hard to bring these to a stop. I assume they included them in the engine because they drop to 4 cyl. What a pain, 43K miles and my brakes go out, I wonder how many lawsuits they are going to get from this? Also, the power steering is mentioned as a defense. Big difference, braking is way above PS in importance. I litterally braked, turned and then barely stopped before hitting a car. I had no warning, and I am a big guy.

Edited by montytx
  • Thanks 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

Same thing happened to me yesterday. Very heavy and hard pedal when parking or applying brakes several times at low speed. 2014 Chev Silverado, 5.3 V8, 42K miles. Chev dealership diagnosed it today, vacuum pump not pulling enough vacuum. Seems a common fault...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...