Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Dealer told me pretty much the same as everyone. GM knows about it and blah blah. I think, personally, they have a fix, just preparing for the large amount of trucks that will need to be prepared. But who the hell knows

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Those who want to jump ship because of an annoyance GM is working on should check the other forums. All manufactures have issues when they come out with new technology. One of the main reasons there are so many people on forums is so they can discuss the issues they are having and get info and reassurance from those in the business or those with the same problems.

 

P.S Brian2015

Gm is not going to void your warranty for installing a cold air kit, specially not for something that is happening with all their new trucks. I have a CAI, shorty headers and a tune, my dealership said the only issue would be if there was a catastrophic engine failure. Then the tune would be an issue if the motor was running outside of normal parameters at the time of the failure.

Edited by AZ_SS
  • Like 2
Posted

Thanks, I have the Airaid MIT, I wondered if that was the cause of the stumble so I reinstalled the factory airduct disconnected the battery but no change.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Took truck to another dealer, said it was the afm... I watch it go into v8 mode on a hill and it's bucking...."normal" he said... bastards have me locked into a 3 year lease... this is the last Chevy I'll ever own... bought many new trucks since 1998....will not recommend to anyone I know.

I feel your pain...
Posted

I have a 17 silverado CC z71 and I'm experiencing the same surge type feel. I had a 14 cc, which did the same thing, but not near as often as this 17. Almost feels like a misfire. I've had my truck since December 2016. ONLY ONE DAY, it didn't do it at all and I was very very stoked at how good the truck drove. I gave it 3000k miles to go away, but the surge/hesitation is still here. Scheduled to take my truck in Tuesday. I may force them to keep it till a fix is avail. It bug the heck out of me that these trucks do this as bad as they do.

They should not be selling these trucks to anyone without checking them first.

Even if they have to custom tune each truck with issues.

These are not in expensive trucks.

Therefore we should expect more.

I feel your pain.

Posted

Dealer told me pretty much the same as everyone. GM knows about it and blah blah. I think, personally, they have a fix, just preparing for the large amount of trucks that will need to be prepared. But who the hell knows

Had the fix done today…Drove home tonight…Guess what? It didn’t work at all…
Posted

You are having the same problem as me. GM has got a bulletin out but no fix as of 1/09/2017. GM is aware of the problem. Keep after the dealer for the fix. I think it's a problem in the computer programming.

Had the fix done today…Drove home tonight…Guess what? It didn’t work at all…
Posted

you guys are so impatient. There will be a fix soon. The 14-16s don't do it so I'm sure they'll fix the software.

 

I don't see what the big deal is.

Had the fix done today…Drove home tonight…Guess what? It didn’t work at all…
Posted

GM Bulletin 17-NA-070.pdf

 

Here is the new GM fix.

 

Had the fix done today

 

Drove home tonightGuess what? It didnt work at all

 

Please if anyone has this fix let me know if it works for you.

 

Shame on you GM for selling these trucks when you know they had these issues.

GM Bulletin 17-NA-070.pdf

GM Bulletin 17-NA-070.pdf

GM Bulletin 17-NA-070.pdf

Posted (edited)

Had the fix done today…Drove home tonight…Guess what? It didn’t work at all…

 

I forgot to update this that the new software for the TCM was out as of the 13th.

 

I haven't done mine yet, or any customer's trucks so I can't comment on if I've seen any differences yet.

Edited by qwank
Posted (edited)
GM Bulletin 17-NA-070.pdf

.02....Oh that's a great idea! Get a custom tune which will invalidate the warranty and just give GM the excuse they need to tell you to disappear altogether.

 

 

Does anyone have a printable version of the tsb #17-NA-070? I bought a 17 silverado 2 weeks ago and I noticed when cruising at 45-60 mph with the tach between 1k-1500 and when starting up a hill and slowly increasing the pedal to keep my speed the truck starts to feel like its miss firing and starts to buck slightly but other then that the truck runs and drives great. Going to call my dealer tomorrow and see what they have to say but I'd like to have a printout of the tsb.

 

Sorry to hear about your truck Dleye, its very discouraging that Gm/ dealer will not stand behind they're product and take care of you. Makes me wonder if it was a Ford, Dodge, or any other manufacturers truck, how they'd handle this.

 

 

GM Bulletin 17-NA-070.pdfGM Bulletin 17-NA-070.pdf

 

GM Bulletin 17-NA-070.pdf

GM Bulletin 17-NA-070.pdf

GM Bulletin 17-NA-070.pdf

Edited by Dleye
Posted

Figured I'd let everyone know I flashed my 2017 with ECM/TCM tuning from Blackbear Performance and the issue is completely gone. The truck also drives so much better! 100% satisfied.

  • Like 2
Posted

2015 Sierra 5.3 here. I hear the same mechanical sound when I exit the truck. Almost like a pump is turning on.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,646 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...