Jump to content

Wireless charging

jrhoyt84
 Share

Recommended Posts

2017SierraSLT Senior Enthusiast

2017SierraSLT

Posted
Posted

To remove the rubber pad, you have to access the bezel screws from the underside.

 

tray4.jpg

 

The cover pulls off with a trim removal tool. Then the charger unit, which is held on by 4 screws must come off to access these 7 screws.

  • Like 1
  • Replies 557
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Ed36rgz71
Ed36rgz71

Have S8+ with a case did this quick and easy just flip the rubber part and you're good to go    

8lugCT
8lugCT

Because the charger is positioned toward the back, and with the way the pad is, the bumper on the backside pushes the phone forward away from the charger. So reversing the mat allows the phone to be p

David Ulbrich
David Ulbrich

The 2018 works just fine with my iPhone X.  I just went to the dealership and tested it out.  I got the part number for the 2018 wireless charger module which is 13507652.  The parts guy said that it

Posted Images

Tattooo Senior Enthusiast

Tattooo

Posted
Posted
To remove the rubber pad, you have to access the bezel screws from the underside.
 
post-123983-0-79588500-1506725351.jpg
 
The cover pulls off with a trim removal tool. Then the charger unit, which is held on by 4 screws must come off to access these 7 screws.
Great thanks
8lugCT Enthusiast

8lugCT

Posted
Posted (edited)

Edit: wrong quote

 

Edited by 8lugmafia
8lugCT Enthusiast

8lugCT

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Tattooo said:

To remove the rubber pad, you have to access the bezel screws from the underside.

Thats not true at all. just pull it off. takes 5 seconds

2017SierraSLT Senior Enthusiast

2017SierraSLT

Posted
Posted

Mine would not. It was too tight against the bezel. Rather than risk breakage, I just pulled it apart. Took less than 5 minutes.

Ironman24 Enthusiast

Ironman24

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, 2017SierraSLT said:

Mine would not. It was too tight against the bezel. Rather than risk breakage, I just pulled it apart. Took less than 5 minutes.

I took the underside apart too. Took no more than 5 minutes and didn't have to worry about breaking anything.

Rosedog Enthusiast

Rosedog

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Nick The Great said:

Does anyone know if the rubber tray is any wider in the 18's vs the 17's?  

 

That's half the problem, the tray is not wide enough for my S7 Edge with case.  Barely wide enough without the case.  

 

Another 1/16" of width would be fantastic 

It should not matter if it is wider or not. I believe the problem may lie within the S7 itself. I have the Samsung Note 8 and I do not have any issues wirelessly charging. I even did a write up about it:

 

Tattooo Senior Enthusiast

Tattooo

Posted
Posted
It should not matter if it is wider or not. I believe the problem may lie within the S7 itself. I have the Samsung Note 8 and I do not have any issues wirelessly charging. I even did a write up about it:
 
Even though it fits my Note 8 does not charge at all on my 16 Sierra All terrain SLT but my S6 edge charges just fine.
Tattooo Senior Enthusiast

Tattooo

Posted
Posted
It should not matter if it is wider or not. I believe the problem may lie within the S7 itself. I have the Samsung Note 8 and I do not have any issues wirelessly charging. I even did a write up about it:
 
I tried to open and read that but it says the page don't exist ?
Rosedog Enthusiast

Rosedog

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Tattooo said:
1 hour ago, Rosedog said:
It should not matter if it is wider or not. I believe the problem may lie within the S7 itself. I have the Samsung Note 8 and I do not have any issues wirelessly charging. I even did a write up about it:
 

I tried to open and read that but it says the page don't exist ?

That's weird. I didn't remove it and I can get in it. 

Rosedog Enthusiast

Rosedog

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, Tattooo said:
1 hour ago, Rosedog said:
It should not matter if it is wider or not. I believe the problem may lie within the S7 itself. I have the Samsung Note 8 and I do not have any issues wirelessly charging. I even did a write up about it:
 

Even though it fits my Note 8 does not charge at all on my 16 Sierra All terrain SLT but my S6 edge charges just fine.

Did you modify your trim? I had to modify mine just so it could sit on the lip of the rubber mat. I also rotated my rubber mat. 

Tattooo Senior Enthusiast

Tattooo

Posted
Posted
Did you modify your trim? I had to modify mine just so it could sit on the lip of the rubber mat. I also rotated my rubber mat. 
No I didn't modify, my note 8 without any case fits but won't charge ?
Tattooo Senior Enthusiast

Tattooo

Posted
Posted
Did you modify your trim? I had to modify mine just so it could sit on the lip of the rubber mat. I also rotated my rubber mat. 
How did you modify the trim ?
8lugCT Enthusiast

8lugCT

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Tattooo said:
20 minutes ago, Rosedog said:
Did you modify your trim? I had to modify mine just so it could sit on the lip of the rubber mat. I also rotated my rubber mat. 

No I didn't modify, my note 8 without any case fits but won't charge ?

the note 8 will charge if you rotate the mat. My note 5 didnt charge until i rotated the mat either

Tattooo Senior Enthusiast

Tattooo

Posted
Posted
the note 8 will charge if you rotate the mat. My note 5 didnt charge until i rotated the mat either
O.k thank you

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,958
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    B07
    Newest Member
    B07
    Joined

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 892 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • davester
      Needing this part.

      By davester · Posted

      hit a junkyard.
    • Z45
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Z45 · Posted

      Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • B07
      Needing this part.

      By B07 · Posted

      Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
    • rav3
      2017 Silverado Front Bumper Valence/license plate holder

      By rav3 · Posted

      https://ebay.io/m/cTI46i

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...